Home Theater Systems - Electronics and Forum - HomeTheaterShack - View Single Post - Why I Rejected Ported/Passive
View Single Post
Old 11-30-06, 10:42 PM   #21 (Link)
bossobass
Exterminated!
Alias: Bosso
Loc: Charlotte, NC
User: #1597
Since: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
  bossobass is offline  
Re: Why I Rejected Ported/Passive


You're both talking about pressure pushing out of the cylinder.

To repeat, when the 2 drivers are in the out position, the cylinder distorts to ovoid, when the drivers are in the in position, it returns to round.

Of course, I'm not talking about a visible flex, anymore than you'd suggest the cube's flex is visible, but flex is not good in any amount, no?

Noah Katz has posted something about his tests of box flex. I don't recall if he actually measured the flex or used math formulae, but if he did measure a box, I wonder if he included a sonotube in his testing?

Bosso


Forum Rules Reply With Quote