Quote:
|
Plus, Its totally irrelevant to my entire post, even the section you're quoting
|
Quote:
|
Your observation (and pretty much common knowledge for people that can read/understand programs like Unibox or WinISD etc) regarding Low Qts/High Bl drivers and the methods of overcoming those two factors hasn't been challenged in this entire thread and SHOULD be noted. We're agreeing with each other, Gosh!
|
I guess the part I am misunderstanding or getting hung up on is this:
Quote:
|
at this point its a non-issue even with drivers with high bl and low Qts because we account for them in the design phases
|
It's only really been accounted for with a design for one driver, and it just gets by. In fact, the main reason it had to even get by was because there was no other quality 15" driver available at a reasonable price from a reputable dealer from about Sept. '05 to something like early summer '06. Ideally, such things shouldn't have to be worried about or dealt with (ideally
). If some wanted a good LMS driver to use for a LLT, the 4000 would be it aside from its poor sensitivity, so it would be nice if the 4100 was similar with just a more efficient or sensitive motor.