| Re: Using REW to assess new equipment Quote: Otto wrote:
Ron,
Those are some cool amps! Actually, they might ket kinda warm, but you know what I mean...
In looking at your measurements, there are some significant differences that I wouldn't necessarily epxect from simply swapping power amps. While I would expect different amps to impart a somewhat different character to the sound, I usually find it's somewhat nuanced.
Can you hear the difference? Were the measurements repeatable? I know they're going to get more and more difficult to accurately capture as you increase in frequency. What kind of smoothing did you use on the plots? Just curious. I wonder how the amps would measure electrically. Interesting result! | I used the 1/3 octave smoothing. Kept all room treatments the same. Would love to try more measurements on other equipment. Can't say I have seen much published data.
I like the sound of the new amps. A little more detailed than the MC-250. The MC-250 is no slouch when it comes to amplifiers, so it is all good  .
Piled bass traps around the left speaker to make a pseudo-anechoic chamber. Below are some interesting graphs from this experiment.  Ron Carlton Dallas, Texas Downstairs: oiled Oak Klipschorns, LaScala (rears), oiled Walnut Heresy II (center), oiled Bubinga Heresy I (rears), SVS PB12-Plus/2 piano black, Outlaw 990, McIntosh MA6100, (2) MC250, MC2100, Oppo DV-981HD, Toshiba HD-A2, Cambridge Audio Azur 640C, Belkin Pure AV PF60, Behringer DSP1124P
Upstairs: McIntosh C2200, MC275 MKIV, oiled Walnut Cornwall I, Denon DVD-2200, Technics SL-1200 M3D, Audio Technica AT150MLX, Richard Gray Power Company 400 Pro |