Home Theater Systems - Electronics and Forum - HomeTheaterShack - View Single Post - SVS vs Ascend
Thread: SVS vs Ascend
View Single Post
Old 03-08-08, 02:07 PM   #10 (Link)
 
DougMac
Senior Shackster
Alias: Doug
Loc: Juliette, GA
User: #15964
Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 141
DougMac is offline
Re: SVS vs Ascend


Quote:
muzz wrote: View Post
I had the Ascend CBM 170SE for Mains, and a 340SE center, and it sounded great.
I now own the Ascend Sierras(in natural) for L/C/R , and have moved the 170 SE's to surround duty(overkill surrounds IMO), and they sound even better.

I still have the 340SE center, was considering using it as a rear center, but I don't really have the room for it, so it's in the original box.
Muzz, could you give me your impression of the difference in sound between the Siearras and the 340SE? My plan was to use 340SE for the L/C/R and 170's for surrounds. Do you feel the 170's are overkill in that they are too good? They are only $35 a speaker more than the HTM-200, so I'll think I'll stick with them as surrounds.

Thanks for taking time to reply. I'm going downstairs right now to put in more sweat equity in the room.

Doug


Forum Rules Reply With Quote