Quote:
brucek wrote:
 No, I would say location #2 is poor with respect to extension. You have lots of low end extension in #1 . You also have a couple peaks that can be equalized away, and then the wholesale gain increased.
Is the graph through your receiver with the mains off and the crossover engaged?
brucek |
Those are through my receiver (H/K 247), with the mains(Klipsch KSF 10.5) on and the XO engaged at 80.
I need to redo the measurements with the mains off?.
But I think I understand what you are saying with regards to the low-end extension.. I guess my brain was thinking that less dips/peaks is best.