| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| BFD | Electronic Equalization Devices Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing?Discuss Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? in the Equalization | Calibration forum; Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? A simple yet but question for anyone who knows mathematics?
What is the equivalent Q setting on the Behringer DCX2496 ... |
|
|
Views: 281 - Replies: 9
| Thread Tools |
| | #1 | ||||
| A simple yet but question for anyone who knows mathematics? What is the equivalent Q setting on the Behringer DCX2496 for 1/3 smoothing? Cheers 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | ||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 | ||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Moving thread to BFD Forum... Regards, Wayne | ||||
|
| | #3 | ||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Well I was afraid of that. I don’t see a forum that says Behringer DCX2496? Edit: I need glasses or bigger screen monitor. I see it, it mentions on the forums page. So I guess you’re stumped on the equation. ![]() 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | ||||
|
| | #4 | ||||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Quote:
Quote:
Regards, Wayne | ||||||
|
| | #5 | |||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Quote:
for that information that’s a great bit of help and the only downside is the DCX2496 will only do (4.0 or 4.5) so I’m not going to nip pick too much that is close enough.That was more or less what I was asking for and oh, well you get what you pay for LOL (4.0 4.5) can not hardly wait to get several DEQ2496 to address these issues. I’ll take peek into the link to see how far the rabbit hole goes down? ![]() 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | |||||
|
| | #6 | ||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Yeah I see! Hold on sec, I’ve stumbled onto this site link before in the past not this page but the site in general, hmm very useful technical guide cheers again Wayne you’re the man. ![]() (4.3) I guess the closest is 4.5 then so I’ll apply that to the basic nine band EQ per six-channel outputs. Why couldn’t Beheringer at least put a bit more technical savvy into its manuals it would have saved me a lot of hassle.It would also be useful if the user can dial in the Q in tiny .0 points rather than prefixed values or at least, oh never mind this would have to suffice. 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | ||||
|
| | #7 | ||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Hay Wayne Also looking back at this the FBQ2496 only has 5.0 which means the filter would be narrower than what I would like it to be. 2.0 even worse LOL is there some form of conspiracy LOL. ![]() 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | ||||
|
| | #8 | ||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Sorry I had to go over this again the FBQ2496 is a nightmare on Elm Street. 0.33 or (0.3333) translates to 1/3. 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | ||||
|
| | #9 | |||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Quote:
Despite its excellent bandwidth resolution, the BFD's bandwidth settings really aren't all that accurate - you can see switching REW's EQ option between the BFD and the FBQ or even a generic PEQ, that a 1/3-octave filter on the BFD (20/60) is more like 3/4-octave on the other equalizers. Regards, Wayne | |||||
|
| | #10 | ||||
| Re: Behringer DCX2496 1/3 smoothing? Afternoon Wayne I only managed to grasp a small portion of what you, where talking about. Wasn’t aware you running a Yamaha LOL I thought you where running like everyone else around here a Behringer. ![]() 70mm was regarded as the Rolls Royce of picture and sound in its day. | ||||
|
|
| « » |
| « |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| behringer, dcx2496, smoothing? |
| Thread Tools | |
| |