BFD as a low pass

[brucek]

Do I just select LP

Ahh OK, yeah, as John points out, you have to select FBQ, and then there will only be one type of filter.

Set a target in REW and enter filters until you see the filter line track that target. Be sure to deselect the check box of all the other lines on the screen except for FILTERS.

It's a bit of trial and error, but you'll see it's quite easy to do with not too many filters.

brucek

[sil180sr]

Happy Holidays! My order for the fbq ended up on backorder so I cancelled. Im thinking of ordering the 1124. Im curious if 12 filters is enough for setting EQ, lowpass filter @80hz and a highpass @ 10hz.

[JohnM]

The BFD doesn't allow filters below 20Hz, and you can't even approximate an HP response with peaking filters. You might want to consider a DCX2496 which is aimed more at crossover applications and has a better set of filtering capabilities to suit.

[sil180sr]

Ive been reading a few threads regarding the DCX and DEQ models and it seems that im in over my head. I know that I want to be able to EQ, have a low pass@ 80hz and prevent my sub from bottoming out. Ive stumbled across a thread where brucek mentioned that a HPF at 10hz probably already exisists. Which has me thinking if a subsonic filter is really necessary, and if i really need to be spending more money on seemingly confusing gear.

As for the low pass filter, I read from another thread where brucek also mentioned that with roughly 6 filters on the BFD you can create a LPF that is mathematically the same as a LPF on crossover. Just thought I would share my thoughts to help clear any confusion I may be having. Thanks!

[brucek]

I know that I want to be able to EQ, have a low pass@ 80hz and prevent my sub from bottoming out. Ive stumbled across a thread where brucek mentioned that a HPF at 10hz probably already exisists. Which has me thinking if a subsonic filter is really necessary, and if i really need to be spending more money on seemingly confusing gear.

As for the low pass filter, I read from another thread where brucek also mentioned that with roughly 6 filters on the BFD you can create a LPF

Well, the EQ part is fine, and you can certainly make a decent resemblance to a low pass with the BFD, but the high pass isn't a function that can be created with filters that the BFD provides.

If you consider your sub audio chain (including the processor and BFD), it's entirely possible you may indeed have sufficient rolloff to protect your sub, but I wouldn't rely on it if you don't know for sure. You would have to test your own system with REW to find out. Ported subs will unload pretty quick, and so you want to check if you're OK before not using a subsonic filter.

brucek

[sil180sr]

maybe ill just get myself a 1124 and just start from there. Any chance I could get those filters created for 80hz?

[brucek]

Any chance I could get those filters created for 80hz?

Yep, here's an 80Hz LPF that uses five filters. I guess it could be done in four, but I used an extra since I extended out quite far (which is probably a good idea).

Certainly in the area of interest the signal is down 45dB. That's certainly enough I would think.

I attached the REW .req file that you can load into REW and play around with yourself if you want, or you can simply read off the filters in the pic and enter them by hand.. I also attach a jpg of the area that your interested in so you can see how it tracks a standard 80Hz 24dB/octave target slope. Close enough.....

Anyway, you can also attempt to make your own when you become more familiar with REW. It's like a jig-saw puzzle to make one of these.

You can simply load these five filters into filter #8-12 of the BFD and forget them. Then you can use filters #1-7 to equalize. If you ever need more than seven filters to EQ a sub, you're doing something wrong...

brucek

--------------------------------------------

80Hz filters


80Hz crossover.req

60Hz filters


60Hz crossover.req


brucek

[sil180sr]

awesome! thanks brucek!

[sil180sr]

Finally had a chance to punch in those filters and test it out, seems to work perfectly! Although I am a little puzzled when using REW. Im using the OSX version and when I load up the filters I get a strange looking graph, not to mention the values are different from the ones in the screen shot you posted. Maybe John can chime in on what im doing wrong? Thanks!

[brucek]

Mmmm, don't know what happened there, sil180sr, but when I look at the req file that I attached in the post #17, it matches the wacky entries you have shown above. I have no idea how that happened.

I went to the file in my computer as I saved it and reattached it to the post again and deleted the old one.

"Save target" on the 80Hz crossover.req and load it into REW. It seems fine now. Go figure.

Anyway, the file (when it's correct) still looks somewhat like the one you show. For a sub we're interested mostly in the low end up to about 400Hz and then that's it. I did add filters up to 10K, but after that it really doesn't matter.




brucek