| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| DIY Speakers Designing mid-high speakers to match SUBDiscuss Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB in the DIY Speakers and Subwoofers forum; Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB This driver is pretty good, but look above
Are you saying this one is better then?
OB application of midway ... |
|
|
Views: 1014 - Replies: 98
| Thread Tools |
| | #76 | ||||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #77 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB >> Does this mean that OB still isnt as good as a sealed box for the size requirement I have? yes. Because you want th box size not much bigger than cube with 5-inch sides. For baffle (with every driver) dimensions could be counted as shown above. Even with 1 m baffle you ll have 10 dB loss @100Hz. 6 db point could be reached with 3.4 m sides. (note, i mean the result without deep electronic correction) Last edited by Yad; 10-22-09 at 07:10 AM.. | ||||
|
| | #78 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB I'm sure - the closed box with good wool damping inside - is the best choice for your application. OB - is good think, but it does not fits everywhere. But i forgot one interesting application. If you have walls made of hyproc (walls with cavities inside) you also could use them as Infinite baffle (Likely OB, but not dipole). Use usual car-installation drivers and mount them directly in to the wall. Or you may use your chosen drivers anyway. But for such installation the Qts driver-factor should be not less than 0.7 (but not more than 0.9..1) Last edited by Yad; 10-22-09 at 07:08 AM.. | ||||
|
| | #80 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB all of them are good. Frankly speaking, I'm not the brand-fanatic ))) You just only should know, what do you want from the driver & the speaker : dimensions/design/frequency range/clarity & details in sound/ or may be wide angle of sound field/ or maybe high Sound Pressure Level/ or only the price matters ///. I'm only able to decide an engineering part of your task. The bigger driver needs larger volume. That's physics. Last edited by Yad; 10-22-09 at 07:31 AM.. | ||||
|
| | #81 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB The trouble is I dont understand the specs, I just assume the Vifa is the best midrange for my budget based on the information youve given me ![]() I dont mind about the price, the size is the most important to me and so is the ability to go down to 80Hz, but I dont care how high it can go because I will have tweeters. | ||||
|
| | #85 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Ok, great. I think they stop making them soon so I will order them. Two more questions: 1. Does it matter if I point the mid at the ceiling, is it much better to point right at you 2. If I made the design into a rectangle instead of a square design, would this affect the sound? | ||||
|
| | #87 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB everything does affect the sound. But If somebody will think about all of that factors without exception - he could become crazy ))))) but there are myths also. For example the direction of the wire ![]() | ||||
|
| | #88 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB These are the three im looking at: 1. Cylinder ID Diameter: 6.5" ID Height: 2" Volume: 1.088Liters 1.Cube ID Width: 4" ID Height: 4" ID Depth: 4" Volume: 1.049Liters 1.Box ID Width: 5" ID Height: 6.5" ID Depth: 2" Volume: 1.049Liters I think the cylinder design would be very nice, but you said cylinder is sometimes not so good. The box design is good because it takes up little sufrace area on my desk, but again, may not soind as good. | ||||
|
| | #91 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Hi, Yes all of those dimensions are internal. Is it possible to model the other two designs. I know the cube may come out best, but this design is also the worst out of the three for my desk space. I would like to know how big the difference is if possible. | ||||
|
| | #92 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Frequency range would be the same. But the difference will be in fluctuations of the FR curve. I found one picture for you. I think, it would be interesting for everybody. This picture shows the difference of diffraction distortion between different cabinet shapes. Last edited by Yad; 10-22-09 at 04:09 PM.. | ||||
|
| | #94 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Yad, what program is that? | ||||
|
| | #96 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB WhilIe the idea and the thread are interesting in it's goals, truthfully there is little to be gained here over your current bose setup as LF extension is limited in such a small space with current driver technology.....small radiating area=poor LF extension....Not my opinion, but Newton's and the other physicists. I applaud your inspirations, but don't expect too much from this type of speaker. If space is the issue, In walls would be a better approach of which many are available commercially on the cheap. | ||||
|
| | #97 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB yep. it's true... some 3-inch drivers are able to give flat frequency response till to 100 Hz at the lo end, but no one will never give you a big total SPL level in it's full range (as 8" for example). That's physics : "The sound pressure level is proportional to diffusor's square & diffusor's displacement... and it's acceleration" But it seems to me, Spades have some specific design boundaries (limits)... Last edited by Yad; 10-22-09 at 05:17 PM.. | ||||
|
| | #98 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Hi everybody. I found some links about Open Enclosure (Open Baffle) and Infinite Baffle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudspe...nfinite_baffle http://www.diysubwoofers.org/ http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/OBS.htm | ||||
|
| | #99 | ||||
| Re: Designing mid-high speakers to match SUB Yad. Im sorry I havent been on here recently, but your links are really useful, especially the troelsgravesen one, ive got some reading to do! Can I assume that I cant get around these size issues by using more speakers in a container, which each having only a small dedicated range, instead of trying to get one speaker to do the whole shibang? Last edited by Spadez; 11-07-09 at 08:00 AM.. | ||||
|