| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| DIY Subwoofers - Sealed and Ported Very low budget sub.Discuss Very low budget sub. in the DIY Speakers and Subwoofers forum; Very low budget sub. Well I already have the $25 driver, so I guess I'll have to work with what I have. And I ... |
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #26 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Well I already have the $25 driver, so I guess I'll have to work with what I have. And I always like to try new things and experiment. So, PR's do that job. 18*18*45 box, with the two PR's on the sides of the ED sub. ** Wait, you said 'tune' the PR's? How does that work? | ||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #27 (Link) | |||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Quote:
PR's are neat and I'm always tempted to use them. Every time I do I end up doing cost calculations and wussing out and just using a design with a larger port. | |||||
|
| | #30 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Thanks, that link helped a lot. * Hmm, I was doing it wrong, and when I plugged in the right numbers, I get something crazy like 23 lb's on each PR. What am I doing wrong? Last edited by mgboy; 02-01-07 at 02:59 PM. | ||||
|
| | #34 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Well, I did it for just one PR (instead of two) and came up with 1307 grams, which is like 2.88 lbs. That has to be way too much, I mean, they sample driver they used was like 280 grams, which is less than a pound. Can it support ~ 3 lbs on the bolt? < Dumb question. I know it can, but it still seems like a lot. Last edited by mgboy; 02-01-07 at 04:18 PM. | ||||
|
| | #35 (Link) | |||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Quote:
But first let me double check my math - I'll get back to you in a few hours (since I have to wait to go home first). BTW, what tune were you using? | |||||
|
| | #39 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Okay, here is a first stab at this. First off, I made the input power 200 watts as that is the most RMS power the driver's voice coil can take (don't max out your amp). I used 170 liters (6 cubic feet) as the size of the enclosure. Here is a plot of the EHQS-12 driver with two of the cheaper Dayton 12" PR's. One has no additional mass (which results in a 30 Hz F3), the other has 300 grams extra weight on each PR (the most it can take). That one is tuned too low and results in an F3 of 43 Hz. As a note (not included), the low mass one barely exceeds driver excursion on the active driver at 25 Hz, but the PR exceeds it at 30 Hz. The high mass one had all kinds of excursion problems starting at 50 Hz. | ||||
|
| | #40 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Here is what I mean. Some of these excursion problems go away by using a smaller box and/or adding a third PR. I haven't yet gotten the driver to not overexcurse below 25Hz no matter what I do (for PR or ported). I'd almost be tempted to experiment with a sealed box with an aperiodic vent. | ||||
|
| | #44 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. Please note that I am by no means an expert here - maybe someone else can pipe up with an idea. I have built a sub that had a similar class driver that has the same excursion pattern at about 23 Hz. It sounds fine as long as I don't feed it movies with real real low bass. I'm just concerned about your desire to go lower then 27Hz and stay "very low budget". Also, if anything else, this would make a decent sealed sub in a 1.8 cubic foot box. Last edited by BoomieMCT; 02-01-07 at 05:47 PM. | ||||
|
| | #46 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Very low budget sub. I am a moron. I was getting too hung up on the F3 and ignoring all the other stuff. Here is a 4.2 cubic foot box with three PR's with 300 grams on each (closer to what you calculated in post #34). It looks pretty good across the board and should get you close to 20Hz. Let this be a lesson in not chasing one metric! Last edited by BoomieMCT; 02-01-07 at 10:35 PM. | ||||
|