| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| DIY Subwoofers New 15” Driver - CSS SDX15Discuss New 15” Driver - CSS SDX15 in the DIY Speakers and Subwoofers forum; New 15” Driver - CSS SDX15 I recently built a sealed subwoofer using the Creative Sound Solutions SD12 and am very happy with the results (I ... |
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (Link) | |||
| New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 I recently built a sealed subwoofer using the Creative Sound Solutions SD12 and am very happy with the results (I will post more on this in a couple of days). Originally, I tried to build an LLT with this driver, but in the end was not able to pull it off. http://www.creativesound.ca/index.html However, it appears CSS will soon have a 15 version of this driver with XBL to boot that should be able to pull of the LLT. Below are the target parameters for the new driver. My understanding is this driver will be available next month sometime. Re: 3.60 ohms (1.8 ohms per coil) Le: 1.80 mH Fs: 19.2 Hz Qms: 3.65 Qes: 0.44 Qts: 0.39 Cms: 0.25 mm/N Mms: 274.8 g Vas: 218.44 l Sd: 790 cm^2 BL: 16.5 N/A SPL: 87.3 dB@ 1W/1M Xmax: 30 mm | |||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver Very good news. Yes, and Robert is thinking of offering a Tumult/Brahma trade-in program for those who own drivers in need of repairs...etc. If you don't have a BFD for your sub, get one fast! If you don't have REW, get it now! | |||
|
| | #4 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver Looks like the new driver should be ready to order next week. Introductory price is $269 http://www.creativesound.ca/ . I am looking forward to getting this driver and comparing it to my TC2000 and Rl-p15. | |||
|
| | #6 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver I am definitely thinking about adding this driver to my list...I've Already spoken with the brain behind Creativesound.ca about the Trade-in program. Sounds like i'll be taking advantage of that ![]() If you don't have a BFD for your sub, get one fast! If you don't have REW, get it now! | |||
|
| | #17 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 You need to contact CSS then. ![]() I will put mine (2 of them) in the 5 cu ft opposing firing enclosure I have. It could be a little bit larger, but I think I can push the Q close to 0.7 with some filling (and DCX2496 will do the rest). That way we also have a direct comparison to TC-2000 drivers. Naturally GP measurements will follow. | |||
|
| | #18 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 I'm confused. When I look at the designs for both sealed and ported boxes on the CreativeSound web site, they show an internal magnet brace that fits snuggly around the magnet and then another brace presses against the back of the magnet and the rear of the box. I've never seen this before? What's the purpose and does anyone do this? magnet brace.jpg brucek | |||
|
| | #19 (Link) | ||||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 Quote:
| ||||
|
| | #20 (Link) | ||||
| Re: New 15” Driver - CSS SDX15 Quote:
My question is about the purpose and necessity of a magnet brace. brucek | ||||
|
| | #21 (Link) | ||||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 Quote:
![]() If you're planning to do it, I would definitely put some weatherstripping etc. in between the magnet and the enclosure. Otherwise this connection may transmit pretty strong vibrations to the enclosure. | ||||
|
| | #22 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 I doubt the magnet brace sees any direct weight from the motor/magnet assembly since the front baffle holds the driver in place. It seems like a typical window brace but with a cutout for allowing it to be placed a little bit closer to the front of the enclosure and as a support for the 2nd enclosure brace. If you don't have a BFD for your sub, get one fast! If you don't have REW, get it now! | |||
|
| | #23 (Link) | ||||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 Quote:
What for? Do these drivers have unusually weak frames...... magnet.jpg brucek | ||||
|
| | #24 (Link) | |||
| Re: New 15 Driver - CSS SDX15 I would have thought the reasoning for the window for the magnet to be like exocer said. I really don't know what the reasoning would be for a magnet support when it is already connected to the box via the driver's aluminum frame/basket. | |||
|