| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| Exodus Audio Maelstrom-18" Gen II LandedDiscuss Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed in the DIY Speakers and Subwoofers forum; Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed While the sims may not show a perfectly flat response with a larger enclosure, do remember to go large enough ... |
|
|
Views: 1627 - Replies: 38
| Thread Tools |
| | #26 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed While the sims may not show a perfectly flat response with a larger enclosure, do remember to go large enough as to be able to use an adequately sized port (at least 8" diameter). | ||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #27 | |||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Quote:
My Mal-X is on it's way.. can't wait. Matt Last edited by mdrake; 06-24-09 at 06:40 PM.. | |||||
|
| | #28 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed I'm excited. Mine shipped out Monday, should have it this coming Monday the 29th. Too bad Kevin lives on the other side of the continent as me...UPS takes a whole week. | ||||
|
| | #29 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed With the new driver I get 128,7L box at QTC 0,707 and Fs 33,93hz Old driver I get 201,1L at QTC 0,707 and Fs 30,76hz Can anyone confirm this? Ok my dilemma is I've already build a box at around 170L and still missing the driver since I live in Europe. If I use a 170L box with the new driver I get a QTC of 0,645 and Fs 30,88. How will this hold up? any comments? I've build 2 boxed and one of them is sitting at a pro painter right now getting its high gloss white finish ![]() Not sure yet if I get Gen I or II here in Europe, I've wrote Kevin asking if its Gen I or II inbound for Europe. | ||||
|
| | #30 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Your modeling is correct. The Gen II in a 170L box will be fine. | ||||
|
| | #31 | |||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Quote:
I'll be finishing this week ![]() | |||||
|
| | #32 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Do you have the sub yet? Is it Generation I or II? | ||||
|
| | #33 | |||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Quote:
If you follow that approach, you don't need 14-16 cubic foot boxes. You can get by with 10-11 cubic foot boxes which are already very big. You don't loose any headroom from 18Hz & up, in fact you gain some. You maximize the output potential in the range that your most likely to need it. Obviously, there are people who disagree with those objectives. That is the nature of the beast. Different people have different priorities. There isn't a wrong or right. You just have to figure out what is most important to YOU and design accordingly. For me, I'm not interested in reproducing 10Hz at reference levels. Kevin Haskins Exodus Audio | |||||
|
| | #34 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed I had modeled (and cut the 24" tube) for a Gen 1, but will have a Gen 2 arriving Monday. Looks like Kevin answered my question: it's up to me to decide what I want to achieve and the design will follow. I am looking to reproduce all of the content recorded in movies, as well as achieve greater spl than my svs cs12: the LLT size isn't a problem. | ||||
|
| | #35 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Hi Kevin, now the Gen-II specs are up on your site, could you please tell me the specs for G-I with the coils in series? I've just obtained one of these and I will have no chance to measure it for a few weeks and would like to play with some enclosure ideas in the interim, before sawdust making. The only T/S I have come from Audiomarketplace and they are quite a bit different from G-II. Cheers | ||||
|
| | #36 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed | ||||
|
| | #37 | |||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed Quote: | |||||
|
| | #38 | ||||
| Re: Maelstrom-18" Gen II Landed These are series wiring specs using the Auto Calculate feature. It says Parallel at the bottom, that's a bug in the program. ![]() | ||||
|
|
| « » |
| « |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| landed, maelstrom-18" |
| Thread Tools | |
| |