| |
|
Welcome to Home Theater Shack forums... a home theater forum for discussion of home theater design, construction and audio video electronics. Check out out popular DIY forums for subwoofers and projector screens as well as our famous Subwoofer Tests forum. Don't miss our DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-ray forums including DVD media reviews and the latest DVD releases.
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which limits features and access to certain areas. For full access, login or register. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free... so please, join the Shack today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| Home Theater Links | Image Gallery | Donations | Glossary |
| High Definition | HD-DVD | Blu-ray Blu-ray playersDiscuss Blu-ray players in the HD World | Computers | Games | Media forum; Blu-ray players are there any BD players on the market today that can do the following... 1080/24 output through HDMI + Decode ... |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (Link) | |||
| | Blu-ray players are there any BD players on the market today that can do the following... 1080/24 output through HDMI + Decode TrueHD/DTS HD I don't even care about HDMI 1.3, as long as it can decode interally it can send the high resolution uncompressed sound to my receiver via analogue cables and I'm all set. My receiver doesn't have HDMI and I'm not about to get one over this. However, I do notice that some of the BD discs for sale are doing 5.1 PCM uncompressed soundtracks. The new James Bond movie Casino Royale is an example. Is it possible that BD is shying away from the codecs to do this PCM thing? Any suggestions on BD player would be appreciated. I'm testing a few now, I am auditioning the Pioneer BDP-HD50-K. (I think the -K just means it's Kanadian because I think the US model has no -K). I don't think I'll keep this disc player though, it's going back... I just hooked it all up and started reading the docs, it doesn't decode TrueHD or DTS HD. But it does True24FPS. Wayde | |||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 (Link) | |||
| | Re: Blu-ray players I put the Pioneer BDP-HD50-K through the paces last night with a viewing (with my son) of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles then... after bed time a viewing of the opening and theme music of Casino Royale. I was thoroughly impressed. I've always been something of an HD DVD guy. Not that I believe in any sort of corporate favoritism but I had been faithful since the early days of the "One Format" petition and the DVD format's committee (whatever it's called, it was a long time ago). Ironically, my allegience to the HD DVD format resulted in me buying the expansion player for Xbox 360. My need for an updated DVD player has me saying well, lets throw in a BD player and I have all the bases covered. I was totally impressed with the Pio BD player. The lossless soundtradck on Casino Royale blew me away. The fight scene in the bathroom that opens the film conveyed all the brutality and blood soaked bludeoning that I'm certain the director intended. The juxtopision between the polite conversation (at gunpoint) and the bathroom fight where 007 explains how he scored his early kills was a masterfully drawn on my HT system. Make that a point for home theater over movie theater. I went to the movies to see this one when it came out and was impressed but not blown away as I was with the Blu-ray disc listening to the lossless uncompressed 5.1 soundtrack. So, I am still in the market for a BD player. Even though I was impressed with it it's going back because it cannot do DTS-HD or Dolby TrueHD. Wayde | |||
|
| | #7 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players I guess I'm a little behind here, (actually I'm sure I used to know this, but I've been out of the loop for a while), but is the lossless PCM version of the soundtrack the same mix as the standard DVD DD track, just uncompressed? And then the True HD and DTS HD are different mixes (or incorporate 7.1?)... or are they just the same mix using different compression (less than standard DD/DTS) that works with the larger bandwidth of the HD formats? | |||
|
| | #8 (Link) | |||
| | Re: Blu-ray players excellent question http://www.avrev.com/blu_ray/revs/05...o_royale.shtml All I can say is that the soundtrack calls it a PCM 5.1 (uncompressed). Probably the same as Dolby Digital. Maybe this is how Blu-ray is going because dual density has so much extra space? I'm not sure. Wayde | |||
|
| | #9 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players I just got off the phone with Sony. Mitch said that the PS3 can do Dolby TrueHD over HDMI (unfortunately no analog if that's what you were looking for) and it also does 1080p/24 as well. I have a PS3 as my BD player and can verify that is is an exceptional player, and very fast too. Not sure if this was one you were considering, but it's worth at least checking into. Unfortunately I don't have the setup to confirm this myself right now. ![]() "Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler." - Albert Einstein "If all else fails, spin the cat."- Grzboken | |||
|
| | #10 (Link) | |||
| | Re: Blu-ray players Thanks WB. I did some reading and research and it turns out that now is not the time to buy any BD players. The main issue is the blu-ray profiles. I'll write something of substance on this in the near future, maybe we can keep it around this forum for future reference. It turns out that the BD isn't quite finished yet. That's not to knock bd as a format but there is an upcoming BD 1.1 and then 2.0 (which I beleive is what they're calling the BD-Live profile). It also looks like Samsung is about to release the Ultimate dual format player. And Denon is about to release the ULTIMATE BD player you ever wanted with high end video processing. If you're interested in the BD format - now is a good time to be patient. Wayde | |||
|
| | #11 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Blu-ray players Quote:
![]() I have both formats, but honestly, I tend to like HD DVD a little better. Except for a couple titles that were mastered exceptionally well, the rest of the Bluray DVDs I have seen, although better than SDVD just weren't quite as good as the HD DVDs I've seen and own. I think if it's true that Paramount and Dream Works animation went HD DVD, that's a huge shift in the tides and I think Black Friday is going to be big for HD DVD. Oh I am sure BD players will be on sale too, but not at the prices I expect Toshiba players to be. I do like the PS3 though and am not trying to come off as a fan boy. I have mine setup as a media server where I have DVDs stored on an external USB drive in full DVD uncompressed quality (uncompressed for the majority of them to be honest, some have slight compression), and I just saw my first 1080p PS3 game over the weekend, so it's a bit more than just a player and I feel one of the few out there now that will be able to be updated to 2.0 compliance. My brother is format neutral as well and overall I think he prefers HD DVD, but he feels ultimately Bluray will win, and right now I am leaning towards HD DVD. The Samsungn player you mentioned, yes that is very interesting as long as it's not like the LG and just plays HD DVD and doesn't support some of the HD DVD features. If it's a full featured player for both formats then they got it right, but the price is going to ultimately kill it I think. So I agree with you, right now it's so close to the release of the new BD players that people should wait just a little longer and see what happens. "Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler." - Albert Einstein "If all else fails, spin the cat."- Grzboken | ||||
|
| | #12 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players I think there are 2 discs out with trueHD currently. The problem really is DTS-HD MA which is favored by Blu-ray and on about one third of all titles currently released. The problem is this, not a single player can decode the full audio track. Certain players can decode a lesser version of it but currently there is no mandatory specs forcing companies to support these audio tracks. This is why you see PCM use on about 30% of the other titles where the space is available. PCM wastes space but is uncompressed and can be played on all players. Unfortunatly because it does waste spaces you are more likely to see this on a 90 minute movie on a 50 g disc which is still in the minority. | |||
|
| | #13 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players Things sure seem to have gotten sloppy lately. It feels like there are too many options and variations of formats to really have anything settle in. Remember when "AC-3" was emerging? It didn't take long to go from onboard player decoding and "AC-3 Capable" receivers to having everything established and built in and ready to go as DD 5.1, and I think DTS 5.1 fit in about the same time as a bonus on many receivers. Even with SACD/DVDA and the bass management issues, external decoding still wasn't that big a problem, and didn't take too long to figure out and settle down. How many new surround formats are there really? I've compiled a list of the main ones, and some of their features (I think - corrections are welcome, this is confusing!) 1) DTS HD High Resolution Audio - higher bitrate encoding than standard DTS, 7.1 channels, backward compatible with existing DTS decoders - optional format for HD discs 2) DD Plus - higher bitrate encoding than standard DD, 7.1 channels for BD/HDDVD, up to 13.1 for audio, also backward compatible - standard format for HD DVD, and optional for BD 3) DTS Encore - Standard DTS but at twice the resolution (1.5 Mbps) for 5.1 channels and the top dogs... 4) DTS HD Master Audio - lossless encoding, unlimited surround channels (7.1 channels for BD/HD DVD), backward compatible with existing DTS decoders - optional format for HD discs 5)Dolby True HD - lossless encoding, 7.1 discrete channels - optional format for BD, may be a standard for HD DVD | |||
|
| | #14 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Blu-ray players Quote:
The largest problem is that the Blu-ray format does not make it mandatory to decode any of these high def audio tracks. So if a studio uses an advanced audio track, the studio has to allow for those consumers that have players that can not decode this track. Which means they would also need to include regular DD audio tracks along with it. So Blu-ray is stuck with leaving everything as PCM uncompressed or including extra audio tracks at the same time, either way wastes space on the discs. Since over 70% of all releases are on 25g discs and over 50% of releases are encoded with MPEG-2 wasting additional space could possibly come at the cost of loss of quality and/or content. | ||||
|
| | #15 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players ugh, what a stupid mess we have. To make matters more confusing, as I posted in the "HD DVD losing ground" thread, apparently we might be seeing a lot more built-in decoding, depending on how the discs are authored. It might even prove to be for the best that way, but it really does add more complexity to the "what should I buy?" question. | |||
|
| | #16 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players Actually, I applaud FOX for being progressive in including lossless audio on the discs, even before there were players/receivers that could handle it. This means that consumers can buy the disc when its released, and won't have to repurchase(double dip) a future disc that would include the DTS HD Master Audio at a later date. Sure, a standardized lossless format that's mandatory would solve this, but so far there isn't a mandatory lossless audio format, so the next best thing is to put lossless on the disc and go from there. | |||
|
| | #17 (Link) | |||
| Re: Blu-ray players I think it's fantastic that some studios are going above and beyond and providing some future proofing in their releases. I remember how lousy some of the first generation DVDs I bought were, and how cranky I was at replacing some of them later on. | |||
|