| |
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| High Definition | HD-DVD | Blu-ray The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray ThreadDiscuss The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread in the HD World | Computers | Games | Media forum; The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread I'd also like to add that I'm tickled that everyone thinks HD-DVD is dead! 50% off movies left and right! ... |
| View Poll Results: Who will win the format war: HD-DVD or Blu-ray? | |||
| HD-DVD | | 25 | 31.25% |
| Blu-ray | | 33 | 41.25% |
| Both will survive. | | 10 | 12.50% |
| I don't know. | | 12 | 15.00% |
| Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | |
| | |
| | #102 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread I just got my 5 free HD-DVDs rebate , I sent my rebate form around black friday. Yamaha htr 5790 Pre/pro | Audiosource Amp 300 powering mains | Audiosource Amp 200 powering center | Onkyo m-282 Powering surrounds | Polk rt800 mains | polk Cs400 center | Polk fx300 side surrounds| polk MKII back surrounds | Velodyne Dps-10 sub + Klipsch Ksw-10 Denon 1600 Sdi modded dvd player + iSCAN HD+ Video scaler |Oppo 980H Toshiba HD-A3 SonicView HD8000 d*sh pvr Panasonic Dmr e-80H dvd recorder Acer PH530 720p projector Da-Lite Video Spectra screen MonoPrice cables | |||
|
| | #103 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread To those still hot on hd dvd looks like a number of retailers are dropping prices like crazy. Check out these slickdeals threads for some awesome deals. http://forums.slickdeals.net/showthr...ghlight=hd+dvd http://forums.slickdeals.net/showthr...ghlight=hd+dvd Enjoy! | |||
|
| | #104 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread http://checkoutblog.com/entries/2008..._platform.aspx Moderator edited. The quoted blog references Wal*Mart urls that do not back up her statement. Nothing in the Wal*Mart links says that they are dropping Toshiba. In fact their Toshiba HD-A3 url shows the A3 back in stock for $139.28 . Bob Last edited by bonehead848; 02-15-08 at 11:52 AM. Reason: Edited by moderator - to correct bloggers's claim. | |||
|
| | #105 (Link) | ||||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread To the mod who edited my post. Here is an official Walmart press release via Gizmodo. Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
|
| | #106 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread Yes, something like: http://www.walmartfacts.com/articles/5673.aspx is an official announcement. No question about it. Very bad news for Toshiba's HD DVD effort. | |||
|
| | #109 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread I hope we don't have to suffer with $400+ players for the next few years and media prices don't stay above the $30 mark. Competition was nice, too bad Sony et al had to pull out a trump card with Warner. I'd like to know the official number of HD-DVD player owners out there. | |||
|
| | #110 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread I'll hold out until it's the same price that I paid for my A2. What was the final dollar value on that trump card anyways? Half a billion? Makes me want to wait until the next format comes out! But I need a Playstation anyways. Is it still true that the BluRay players out there right now cannot be upgraded to the final standard? And if they cannot why are people buying them? ![]() mech mech Got questions? Start a thread. | |||
|
| | #111 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread I don't think I've heard anything that was fact based about the payout to Warner. I bet it mostly intangible stuff like advertising, buying movies to include with players and post production work to make Blu-ray discs. Though one rumor said $500M + other incentives to make it more like $800M. I would think there would be anti-competition laws that forbid that sort of thing. I'm sure Toshiba has their corporate lawyers working on something. | |||
|
| | #112 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread Blu-ray was/is designed for recording 2 hour movies using the MPEG2 video codec with LPCM audio. This required the 50 GB storage size and 48 Mbps transfer rate. A good technical fit for this recording application -- but makes for a non-compatible with DVD production and expensive stamped production process for mass produced two layer 50 GB BD-ROM (hard to get the protective clear coat to be even on the outer part of the disc -- it bunches up). HD DVD was design for lower cost, mass produced, HD DVD-ROM that can use existing DVD lines with an upgrade that is not outragous. It does required advanced video codecs (VC-1 or AVC) and advanced audio codecs to get a 2 to 3 hr movie to fit on a two layer 30 GB disc. Each was designed with different constraints -- but each works well at providing 1920x1080p24 movie playback with improved audio. Both use 405 nm blue/violet laser diodes. To call either a "gimmick" is not valid, IMHO. BD has won -- but not for technical or even mass market reasons (PS3 users != people have spoken) -- again IMHO. | |||
|
| | #113 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread I just posted in another thread on this same topic. It's over, which is good from a "moving forward" perspective. However, the damage is done. Sony is dead to me and always will be. If I ever get a BR player it will be when Toshiba releases one for under $200. Until then, upconverted regular DVD is the way to go. I'm hoping a download ownership model is in place by then and I'll forego a disc-spinner altogether. | |||
|
| | #114 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread Interesting article on the subject. Not a technical battle of the best technology... only one of marketing momentum. http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/japan_toshiba Mitch | |||
|
| | #116 (Link) | |||||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread Quote:
http://www.dvdtown.com/news/toshiba-...going-blu/5255 Quote:
| |||||
|
| | #117 (Link) | |||
| Re: The Official HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray Thread Well we knew this was coming. Too bad I bought the top of the line player, HD XA2, shortly before Warners pulled out but at least I'm getting some enjoyment out of it and will continue to use it for upscaling and my small HD DVD collection until it dies. HD DVD can join the enormous list of defunct video formats: Two Inch Videotape (Professional) One Inch Videotape (Professional) 3/4" Videotape (Professional and Home Use) Betamax Videotape (Home Use) Beta SP Videotape (Professional) Laserdisc (Home Use) SelectaVision CED (Home Use) Digital Videotape (2K resolution) (Professional) HD DVD (Home Use) For the time being, the surviving formats are Standard DVD, VHS (barely), Digital Videotape (4K resolution) and Blu-ray DVD. In the near future VHS will probably disappear. They are developing 8K resolution digital Videotape for professional use which will eventually replace 4K. In contrast the standard for most film presentations is 35mm from 1897 through 2008. I shoot all of my feature films in 35mm which can be transferred to any format currently in use or that may be developed in the future. Most of the companies involved in video transfers have gone out of business over the years because they have to borrow heavily to install the equipment which ends up obsolete before they can pay back the cost. Labs are having difficulty staying in business too. Both the lab that processed my negative and the video transfer house have gone under since I shot my current feature in June. Of course I always keep the master negative in my own storage vault. I would never leave my negative or video master at any lab since they can go out of business at any time and they don't have archival vaults, just storage rooms. Last edited by Richard W. Haines; 02-19-08 at 04:59 PM. | |||
|