Corner trap depth vs efficiency - Page 2 - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #11 of 26 Old 01-30-08, 01:41 PM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
bpape's Avatar
Bryan Pape
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Loui
Posts: 5,204
Send a message via AIM to bpape Send a message via Skype™ to bpape
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

It won't go a ton deeper but it will do some. It is also 25% more surface area - not just more depth. It's really more about getting more efficient absorbtion down low. So, instead of say a .5 at 50hz, you might go to a .65 or so (pure guessing here - just an example) rather than saying OK, now it's going to do 25hz instead of 30hz. Both will do something down that low, just a matter of how much.

The next logical step from a 17x17x24" solid triangle (8 pcs per 2x4 sheet) is a 24x24x34 triangle (4 pcs per sheet). This is almost 50% increase in facial surface area plus an additional 7" of depth - but at double the material cost and significantly more space out of the room.

Bryan

I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.

Bryan Pape
Lead Acoustician
GIK Acoustics
bpape is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 26 Old 05-24-09, 08:48 PM
Howard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4
Question Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Would 17" X 17" squares of absorbing material from floor to ceiling in a corner be twice as good as 17" X 17" X 24" corner chunks? It would have twice as much absorbing material, but it would extend 12" further into the room.

Howard
hdjii is offline  
post #13 of 26 Old 05-25-09, 08:40 AM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
bpape's Avatar
Bryan Pape
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Loui
Posts: 5,204
Send a message via AIM to bpape Send a message via Skype™ to bpape
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Twice as good? Probably not. You're getting 2 17" wide by X high sides as opposed to a single 24" wide by X high side. Yes, it will give you more exposure - and - it will reach deeper into the subwoofer range more effectively.

You could split the difference and get the same area and better absorption by doing a 12x12" square with the same amount of material it takes to do the17x17x24" triangles.

Bryan

I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.

Bryan Pape
Lead Acoustician
GIK Acoustics
bpape is offline  
post #14 of 26 Old 05-25-09, 09:25 AM
Howard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

What about rotating the triangles 180 degrees to make a column with absorber in the outer half of each square. Would this have significantly more effectiveness, just a little more or essentially the same?
hdjii is offline  
post #15 of 26 Old 05-25-09, 09:28 AM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
bpape's Avatar
Bryan Pape
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Loui
Posts: 5,204
Send a message via AIM to bpape Send a message via Skype™ to bpape
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

It would be more surface area and perform a bit deeper due to the absorption being farther from the corner. Never tried it this way. I wouldn't think it would be significantly better than the 12x12 solid.

Turning it like that still has the edges of the triangle without much thickness.

Bryan

I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.

Bryan Pape
Lead Acoustician
GIK Acoustics
bpape is offline  
post #16 of 26 Old 05-25-09, 09:36 AM
Howard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Thanks. That was what I thought. Since I prefer the appearance of the columns in the corners rather than the angle of the typical triangular chunks, I am now considering the use of columns with triangles in the outer half of each square vs. columns with the same dimensions completely filled. The second option is twice as expensive, but perhaps not quite twice as effective.
hdjii is offline  
post #17 of 26 Old 05-25-09, 09:40 AM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
bpape's Avatar
Bryan Pape
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Loui
Posts: 5,204
Send a message via AIM to bpape Send a message via Skype™ to bpape
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Correct. The 12"x12" IMO is the best way to go if you want to keep costs down and still get excellent performance with the look of columns and not taking up as much space.

Bryan

I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.

Bryan Pape
Lead Acoustician
GIK Acoustics
bpape is offline  
post #18 of 26 Old 05-25-09, 12:53 PM
Howard
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Thanks for your help, Brian.

Howard
hdjii is offline  
post #19 of 26 Old 06-23-09, 03:11 AM
Shackster
 
loupy31's Avatar
Peter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 78
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Hi, When you guys say 12" x 12", do you mean width, depth and what ever the hight of the corner is?

Peter
loupy31 is offline  
post #20 of 26 Old 06-23-09, 06:39 AM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
bpape's Avatar
Bryan Pape
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Loui
Posts: 5,204
Send a message via AIM to bpape Send a message via Skype™ to bpape
Re: Corner trap depth vs efficiency

Yes. That's exactly it. Just frame it out and stack 12"x12" squares floor to ceiling in the framing.

Bryan

I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.

Bryan Pape
Lead Acoustician
GIK Acoustics
bpape is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
corner , depth , efficiency , trap

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome