| |
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| Home Audio Subwoofers Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub????Discuss Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? in the Manufactured Speakers and Subwoofers forum; Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I'm in the market for a Subwoofer and not looking to break the bank! Would like to stay around $600 ... |
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (Link) | |||
| Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I'm in the market for a Subwoofer and not looking to break the bank! Would like to stay around $600 or less, if possible. What's the best bang-for-the-buck in this price range. I have Polk RTi10's for the front, CSi-A6 center, TC80i rears and an Onkyo 805. Shoot me some suggestions...Have about spent all I want to at this point, just want to get it working!! | |||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? 600$ or less you have some good choices. Here are the ones that I would look at. AV123 MFW-15. This is a 15" ported sub that comes in a lot of very good looking finishes and is designed by Mark Seaton. You can also get a discount if you order a pair(1000$). There is a long wait right now though. Epik Knight. A little bigger but otherwise similar to the MFW-15. Ported 15" a lot of people rave about this sub too. This one also has a wait due to demand. It is not as nicely finished as the MFW-15. ED A5-350. Ported 15" like the other 2. This is the least nicely finished though and there is a really long wait for them. Also there have been a few problems cropping up with the amps used in them. If you don't feel like waiting a month(or 2) for a sub, you should be looking at Outlaw, HSU, and SVS. | |||
|
| | #3 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I agree with Ricci because I have the A5-350 and for the money it was the best choice for me. As far as the problem with the amps I think that problem was with the A5 -300 and that is why they stopped making the 300 and went to the 350. Mine has worked fine but it is a fairly long wait so if your looking for something right now it might not be the route to take. ED also ships them for free and at 128lbs that saves a few bucks also. You can check the ED subs out here. www.edesignaudio.com | |||
|
| | #4 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? Best bang for the buck? Probably a DIY sub. If you are not up for that,... maybe a Dayton sub kit from Parts Express. You've already gotten a few good suggestions. I'd also suggest SVS. Mark | |||
|
| | #5 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? Quote:
That's a nice, tidy little summary. | ||||
|
| | #6 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? In my opinion the SVS PB12 NSD for $599 its a box sub with a front fireing 12" driver and cant be beat for that price range. It will go down to 18hz without a problem. Home theater: Onkyo TXSR805 receiver, Samson Servo 4120 bridged @240wattsX2, 2-Mission 765 Mains, 4-762i's Rears, SVS PB13 Ultra, AR center PSC25, 2 Audio control C131 EQ's, Toshiba HD AX2 & Samsung BDP1400 DVD players, Sanyo Z2 projector Two Channel system: Yamaha RX-V995, Mission 764i's & A/D/S MS3u sub Yamaha KX-393 Tape deck, CDC 805 5 disc CD changer, LG DV7832NXC DVD player, Motorola HD-PVR, Sony KP-53HS30 rear projection HDTV, turntable PS-T20 Nintendo Wii | |||
|
| | #7 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I agree with Tony, I have the PB12-NSD right now it hits hard and goes plenty deep. It is also worth considering along with the other already mentioned subs. It is good to have so many quality subs in the $500-600 range. | |||
|
| | #8 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? You may also want to consider the FW12.1 on clearance right now. Our custom subwoofers also start in that price range. | |||
|
| | #9 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? Thanks for all the replies. The other "issue" I have is that the room this is all going in is a large basement rec room (24'x40') with tile floor (I know, not the best suited for sound...). Does it make the most sense that I stick with front firing? I see SVS also has the "tube" style, but I suspect that would not work very well for me. Any additional comments? | |||
|
| | #11 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? In your case it really comes down to taste, either will preform well in your environment the advantage to a downfireing sub is if you have a wood floor the movement of the sub will actually cause the floor to vibrate giving you even better response but because its a tile floor with I am assuming cement under that there will be little vibration transfered through it. Home theater: Onkyo TXSR805 receiver, Samson Servo 4120 bridged @240wattsX2, 2-Mission 765 Mains, 4-762i's Rears, SVS PB13 Ultra, AR center PSC25, 2 Audio control C131 EQ's, Toshiba HD AX2 & Samsung BDP1400 DVD players, Sanyo Z2 projector Two Channel system: Yamaha RX-V995, Mission 764i's & A/D/S MS3u sub Yamaha KX-393 Tape deck, CDC 805 5 disc CD changer, LG DV7832NXC DVD player, Motorola HD-PVR, Sony KP-53HS30 rear projection HDTV, turntable PS-T20 Nintendo Wii | |||
|
| | #12 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? Quote:
![]() | ||||
|
| | #13 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I agree, Shokhead and tonyvdb. Got a close-out silver PB12-NSD for $499 last May. Live 78 miles from SVS so I was able to pick it up myself and save on shipping. Ed Mullen told me I got one with the updated amp. Great performer on both HT and music. Last edited by bac4822; 04-05-08 at 11:30 PM. | |||
|
| | #14 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? i've owned several SVS subs starting with a 2039 passive cylinder which put me in the SVS camp for life. I was skeptical so I bought their cheapest at the time. . . That turned into a PB12+2 plus their first 10incher. After several more over the last few years now I've settled down to what I consider their best bang sub. A PB12NSD2. I've now owned this PB12nsd2 for almost 1 year and it still amazes me. . . I've also owned their PB12isd2 which is very similiar but can't hang with the newer NSD2 period. . . I don't know how you can beat an SVS subwoofer period no matter how you judge it. . . Mahr's Law of Restrained Involvement. Don't get any on you. . . | |||
|
| | #16 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I think it was priced too cheap and was too close to the plus model in performance besides with the Ultra out and reasonable it might have just fell through the cracks. . . Mahr's Law of Restrained Involvement. Don't get any on you. . . | |||
|
| | #17 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? Quote:
I've read of some people being initially disappointed with the PB-12 NSD. The only other sub I've owned was a little Infinity SV-10 servo cube. It let you know it was there. I sat down for the first time last night for an extended listen. At first, I thought there was less bass than with the recently deceased Infinity. What I discovered is the SVS wasn't honking out a couple of notes, it was playing extended really deep bass. I watched Frontline about the ill fated year on Mt. Everest. When the wind was howling, there was a ton of low frequency energy. The sub doesn't call attention to itself, it just provides really wonderful low end. I also watched David Gilmore at the Royal Albert Hall. Again, the bass was smooth and deep, not in your face. I now think what I was hearing with the Infinity was peaks and harmonics, not true bass. Doug | ||||
|
| | #18 (Link) | |||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? I think that good clean bass takes a little while to get used to it especially when what you were hearing was distortion or one that was setup completly wrong. I also think that many of those who don't like subs either don't know how to set one up properly and maybe have never heard one that was right. . . I've had subs since the early 70s and wouldn't have it any other way. If for no other reason than the flexibility a good sub offers. Among other pluses are lower power requirements, allowing the use of smaller less expensive main full range speakers. . . Sometimes I just forget mine is in the house. I could swear the bass is coming from the speaker that the bass would have been directed to if I had no sub. I've had friends sit right next to the sub yet swear nothing was coming from it. . . Mahr's Law of Restrained Involvement. Don't get any on you. . . | |||
|
| | #20 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Best Bang for the Buck for a Sub???? Quote:
So, in summary, maybe for them, nothing (literally) really is coming from it.. | ||||
|
![]() |
| « » |
| « |
| |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best bang for the buck 50-60" DLP 1080p? | mrstampe | Video Displays and Processors | 1 | 12-19-07 10:37 PM |
| SVS 25-31 PC-Plus Subwoofer with SVS SBS-01 5.0 package = Enormous Bang For the Buck! | Kipp Jones | SVSound | 1 | 02-11-07 08:04 AM |