| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| Home Audio Subwoofers Battle of the MonstersDiscuss Battle of the Monsters in the Manufactured Speakers and Subwoofers forum; Battle of the Monsters Could someone explain to me why aluminum would make a better enclosure? Is it because it is less flexible (assuming ... |
|
|
Views: 2256 - Replies: 51
| Thread Tools |
| | #26 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Could someone explain to me why aluminum would make a better enclosure? Is it because it is less flexible (assuming thick enough aluminum)? Thanks bob "There is always hope, even if it is just a fool's hope." | ||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #27 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters I was thinking mostly about the transfer of heat the driver produces when asked to dissipate a few kilowatts in a sealed box. The basket could transfer heat to the mounting area given a thermally conductive sealer, and the backwave could blow directly on the aluminum like a gigantic heatsink. This along with the Acoupower driver's efficient heat wicking pole vent and 5 cubic feat of heatsink around the basket would be a winner me thinks. Dr V | ||||
|
| | #28 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Plus it would just look cool. Dr V., Did you ever decide what you are going to do with your Acoupower's? I'm guessing that maybe you are holding out for Illka's tests to help decide what to do ? | ||||
|
| | #30 | |||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Quote:
I'd like to see it test of course, but I think thats a long time away for Illka to get a driver. Last I heard communication between the two has been sparse. I'm glad to hear Nathan's impression of the ACP as being "tight". This puts more weight on considering a reflex alignment. I definitely want a tight sound. Moreover I don't want to be underwhelmed with my upgrade. I've got lots of other considerations as well that I won't get into just yet. One of these days soon I'll jump in and start cutting... Dr V | |||||
|
| | #32 | |||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Quote:
![]() ASME AI Yamaha RX-V2500, Wharfedale Diamond 9.6 Fronts, Wharfedale Diamond CM Center, Diamond DFS Surround and rear, Behringer FBQ 2496, Dual RL-P18s 625L LLTs, Dual TA-2400 Pro (2 * 2000 W Amp), Samsung HD870 DVD player, Carada BW 16:9 106" screen, Epson TW-2000, 60 Gb PS3 Important HT proverbs: - "You can never have too much headroom" (talking about bass) - "you can never have too big a screen" (talking about still pictures) Projector selection basics Epson TW 2000 review | |||||
|
| | #33 | |||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Quote:
! JK Arthur. Maybe a pair in 9ft sealed each with some Itech8000 voltage???Monster is the right term for the XXX though. I'm still trying to get a good imagining of what 118.6db at 10hz sounds like . I've never heard bass like that. Maybe some solid high-output 16hz stuff but nothing that heavy at 10hz. I don't think my tired old Velodyne CT1500's will do that much output at 40hz. That's from 1 driver too. | |||||
|
| | #34 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Just a simple manual measurment with a straight edge and a ruler, just to see how the suspention travel compared for the three drivers, they do stretch 5-10mm more in each direction when under power, so they all seem to have there respective claimed mech travel. Nathan Funk Funky Waves Audio | ||||
|
| | #35 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Great work Nathan and very usable listening impressions. It looks like the loss of the LMS doesn't mean the "ultimate DIY sub driver" is history. The XXX and the ACP are just as adequate for what we need! Lets get busy and get these two amazing drivers some place to vibrate . . . . . Vinculum . . . . EAR? | ||||
|
| | #36 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters I don't know. There still isn't a big uber 18 for the small sealed boxes or PR'd enclosures. That was what the LMS did well and there is not really a replacement for that yet. The Acoupower is more suited to mid-sized alignments(for an 18) and the XXX for large enclosures. Neither are going to rock in 100L quite like the LMS will. The Acoupower would be better in 200L and the XXX in 300L, or thereabouts. | ||||
|
| | #37 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Using WinISD take a look at the performance of (2) XXXs in a 6 cu. ft. sealed box with a Linkwitz Transform with the Fo set @ 40 and the Fp set@ 15. I know that's not a 100L but it's a manageable size. | ||||
|
| | #38 | ||||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters I have to say this that there is some really interesting stuff going on. Great work Nathan, since you have the skills and the equipment, can you take a nearfield measurements from the drivers at hand? It would be nice to see how low the Le in acoupower really is.Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||||||
|
| | #39 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Anidabi, Back on the first page Nate posted this from the WFT3 for the Acoupower Published: Fs: 28.2hz Re: 6.2 Qms: 8.9 Qes: 0.62 Vas: 174L Le: 1.2mH Measured Fs: 24.9hz Re: 6.16ohm Qms: 4.18 Qes: 0.59 Vas: 177L Le: 0.72mH 0.72mh LE ![]() ISLAND1000, I still have another XXX 18 that I will be going sealed with at some point. Were you saying 6ft for 2 of them? I'm thinking that I will do around 8ft sealed for my one. The problem is that the main claim to fame of the XXX is the HUGE displacement ability and it's almost impossible to get enough power to use most of it in a small sealed box. How much did you model it with in 6ft? | ||||
|
| | #40 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Hi Ricci! I saw that, but I was refering to proper graph where you can see it clearly. Like this: ![]() and this: ![]() http://www.hometheatershack.com/foru...html#post51571 The numerical Le doesn't tell you in wich impedance model they have been measured(praxis, MLSSA, klippel). TC Sounds drivers have been measurured with praxis method and I believe that Exodus audio with klippel. Acoupower method I don't know. Unibox models with LR-2 method(don't know this stuff, just heared from Ilkka) and winISD does only a rough impedance modeling. So LMS Le parameter doesn't model right with unibox and in winISD Le is useless because it produces wrong FR. It's a bit messed up situation with different measuring methods and modeling programs. That's why I would like to see picture over some random number. ![]() | ||||
|
| | #41 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Nathan, Are the Acoupower and the LMS the same mounting pattern and size? If so, maybe run the LMS in the 130L sealed box to compare against the Acoupower? Sidenote:I watched Finding Nemo last night with the XXX sub and the Darla tapping on the tank scene was ! My girl was holding a glass of red wine and it was shaking in her hand. I love this sub man! Thank you! | ||||
|
| | #43 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters It's so nice to see that there are still some killer big drivers out there (not that I'll have the need for one any time soon). Having a few options at this level is going to lead to some really impressive projects, and I can't wait to see them as they roll in. Nathan, thanks for stepping up and comparing these monsters. | ||||
|
| | #44 | |||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Quote:
Funkywaves, can you take a close mic measurement of the XXX sub? | |||||
|
| | #45 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Steve, I no longer have the XXX sub, so I can't take any more measurements, I was going to get a ground plane before it shipped but I ran out of time. Take a look at these graphs comparing the FW18.1 ground plane and same enclosure in the same location as the XXX sub was in. If you look at 20hz and 10hz. There is a 16db differential from ground plane to in room, if you factor that in to the XXX sub it is down 17db at 10hz from 20hz, so in actual fact it is only down 1db at 10hz, this might be off a few db, Simulations predict around 4db down at 10hz, it is probably closer to that, but it gives an idea what is going on there anyway. My room has a very large resonance at 20hz that is causing that. Nathan Funk Funky Waves Audio | ||||
|
| | #46 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Ricci, can you take a close mic FR? | ||||
|
| | #47 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Steve, I'm getting to it soon. I just got back from a business trip to HK last night and I have a lot of loose ends I need to tie up. I still need to give a review of the SDX subwoofer! I just fired up my new notebook today actually and I'm getting ready to download REW. Apparently someone lifted my Turtle Beach SC I ordered while I was gone , so I've got to iron that out too. I'll get to it hopefully within the next week or 2. Nathan had one of my XXX's. As he has noted the 25ft cab was tuned to 11hz roughly and this was confirmed with an impedence measurement and also through test tones. It should be around 3 to 6db down at 10hz and this seems to be the case, but I will definitly try to confirm concretely with measurements when I can. | ||||
|
| | #48 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Once I get REW running I'll take some FR measurements on the XXX enclosure. Here is the impedence curve that Nathan took with the WFT3. I also measured this and got a nearly identical reading. ReXXXbox impeadance.pdf | ||||
|
| | #49 | ||||
| Re: Battle of the Monsters Here is a raw FR of the XXX at one of the primary listening spots. ![]() here is a close mic of the driver... ![]() How do I go about getting a good close mic response of the system? It's in room and the port and driver are separated. Do I just put the mic half way between the 2? What level? | ||||
|