Not to throw a wrench into the works, but I'd like to suggest a different frequency bandwidth on the posted graphs.
200Hz is less important and the first few octaves are more important, IMO. Even if a sub doesn't reach to single digits, being able to see if the sub is rolling off or if there's just a dip below 15Hz, as well as what the ultimate roll off is, is much more important to me than what the sub does from 100-200Hz.
As an example, here is a measurement before any tweaks with the area boxed in that would normally not be shown, if the graph stopped at 15Hz going down:
In this case, it might have appeared that the sub was rolling off sharply below 15Hz. Also, some tweaks affect VLF that would otherwise not be noticed.
Of course, it's only my opinion, and if it's too much problem, never mind, but I thought I'd ask.:flex:
Bosso
200Hz is less important and the first few octaves are more important, IMO. Even if a sub doesn't reach to single digits, being able to see if the sub is rolling off or if there's just a dip below 15Hz, as well as what the ultimate roll off is, is much more important to me than what the sub does from 100-200Hz.
As an example, here is a measurement before any tweaks with the area boxed in that would normally not be shown, if the graph stopped at 15Hz going down:
In this case, it might have appeared that the sub was rolling off sharply below 15Hz. Also, some tweaks affect VLF that would otherwise not be noticed.
Of course, it's only my opinion, and if it's too much problem, never mind, but I thought I'd ask.:flex:
Bosso