Star Trek 2009 - In Theaters - Box Office Review - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 78 Old 06-08-09, 11:23 PM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
wbassett's Avatar
Bill
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,234
Star Trek 2009 - In Theaters - Box Office Review

Not out on DVD yet, but why wait? There really hasn't been a big screen Trek movie since The Wrath of Khan. Many may disagree with me on that, but if they search their Trek loving hearts, deep down most will have to admit the rest of the movies were pretty much just good quality TV series level of entertainment. Not this one though... Move over Obi Wan... This ain't you're father's Star Trek!

J.J. Abrams took some liberties and even broke a few Trek 'rules', but it all works. There are some really good nods to the original series and even the actors that played the roles before this new cast stepped in to fill some pretty big shoes. The problem with a franchise reboot or prequel is that we already know the outcome. All the characters survive. They have to, because we know about their other adventures. Abrams put a bit of a twist on things though. Although he deftly crafted a story that assembled the Enterprise crew together, it wasn't how they 'originally' met, and that's why this works.

This is my second viewing of Star Trek at the theater. The first time I went with my brother, this time my wife actually wanted to see it so I took her tonight. She is a 'mild' Trek fan at best, and basically tolerates it because she knows I like it. It didn't take long before she dropped the take it or leave it attitude and really got into this movie.

What really impressed me was I was actually trying to figure out how Abrams was going to 'fix' certain things that start off oh so wrong. During my first viewing my fear was that he wasn't going to and that this new Trek would end up a sell out and Star Trek in name only. Trust me, even the most hard core fan will accept this entry, but more important is that it is simply a great sci-fi/action flick too.

There is even some touches of politics in the story, as well as prejudices- surprisingly from the Vulcan Academy itself! Also look for the infamous 'Red Shirt' scene.

If there is one thing to complain about, in my opinion it would be the engineering spaces. Granted I am very familiar with the engine rooms on real naval warships, and they can be a maze of pipes and valves and in general a very low tech looking environment. Thing is though, we're talking about the 23rd Century and I like the old Trek engineering levels better. These look like they ran out of set budget so they filmed in a manufacturing plant somewhere.

Abrams is also known for his fast pace and faster cuts too. Even though we do get to see the Enterprise bridge in quite a few scenes, I honestly couldn't describe the layout to anyone and it was quite different than in any other Trek show or movie.

The cast was well thought out and Trek has the unique ability of capturing lightning in a bottle more often than any other franchise out there. Many, including Roddenberry doubted if they could get the same chemistry between the main characters in Star Trek The Next Generation as they had in the original series. The franchise did have some major misfires with some of its other spin off series, but... Roddenberry always said the true star of the show was the Enterprise itself and the crew was secondary.

All the banter we have come to love is there, and we even get some back story on some characters too. Karl Urban absolutely nails McCoy. He looks like DeForest Kelly, and even sounds like him. Pine's Kirk though isn't quite the same but all the elements are there- He's confident and even arrogant, he has an eye for the pretty ladies... but most important is his drive and tenacity to win at all costs. Kirk coyly said in Wrath of Khan that he doesn't believe in a no win scenario... Pine's Kirk proves it and then some.

Simon Pegg as Scotty- I never remembered James Doohan as the 'plucky comedic relief' in the original series, but Pegg pulls it off. He's witty, funny, and charming all at the same time.

Quinto's Spock is almost uncanny. Certain shots he is a dead ringer for Nimoy in the original series. Quinto does a fantastic job of bringing the complex turmoil buried deep within Spock. Nimoy does reprise his role in an extended 'cameo' but his part was mainly an homage to the original show and it very easily could have been omitted.


Nero is played by Eric Bana and he has less screen time than he deserves. Bana chewed scenery every bit as well as Ricardo Montalban did as Khan, he just didn't get as much screen time to truly make him an interesting foe.

One thing that was really odd about these 'villains' was the way they introduce themselves. After an unprovoked barrage of missiles, they open hailing frequencies and say 'Hello'. It just sounded really strange hearing a Romulin say hello that casually, especially considering the situation. I'd love to hear Abrams reason, I'm sure he had one.



Captain Pike was played by Bruce Greenwood. This was another bullseye. Greenwood made Pike a natural leader and added tons of respectability to the cast. Greenwood may not be known by many though. Most people will probably be sitting there thinking 'Who is he? I know I saw him somewhere!' He's been doing TV for ages, but most probably recognize him as the President in National Treasure: Book of Secrets.

Sarek, Spock's father was a bit of a surprise to me. Sarek is played by Ben Cross who usually plays the bad guy or heavy. I remember him the best as Prince Malagant in the Richard Gere/Sean Connery version of King Arthur's tale in First Knight. Cross impressed me very much because he went from being so evil in that flick to stoic and dignified as Sarek.

All in all it was an excellent cast they assembled. Even John Cho, better known to many as Harold from the Harold and Kumar flicks, slipped comfortably into his new role as Sulu.

It goes without saying that the special effects were top notch. Many of the other Trek outings, especially the Next Generation movies skimped on new FX and even recycled FX scenes from the TV series... and it showed. Abrams didn't cut any corners and it's obvious he was given a huge budget to work with. My guess is now that Star Wars is officially done, Paramount finally woke up and realized they had something that could appeal to more than just the hard core fans, but they'd have to pony up some money to do it right and grab the attention of non-Trek fanboys.

When this comes to DVD it hopefully will be nothing short of spectacular, but Paramount isn't exactly known to do the best transfers to disc. I have the new Bluray sets of the movies and season 1 of the original series and will be doing a review on those. As long as Paramount keeps that level of quality when they release this, it is going to be a mind blower in anyone's home theater.

It's non stop action and adrenaline.
I give it across the board!


"Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler." - Albert Einstein

"If all else fails, spin the cat."- Grzboken

Last edited by wbassett; 06-09-09 at 11:59 AM.
wbassett is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 78 Old 06-09-09, 06:23 AM
Plain ole user
 
lcaillo's Avatar
Tech Guru
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL, USA
Posts: 11,121
Send a message via AIM to lcaillo
Re: Star Trek 2009

Great review. Great movie.

I am an old school Star Trek fan who agrees with your view of the movies after Khan. This was a winner. The casting and performances were great. I differ with you on the sets. The original series sets were simplistic, as the budgets were limited and it was a popular view of the future of technology to make it sleek. Our view of the future is more complex, and the maze of technology gave a more interesting backdrop for the movie.

Looking for me, just google my username. I have used the same one for most sites for many years.
lcaillo is offline  
post #3 of 78 Old 06-09-09, 09:16 AM
HTS Hillbilly
HTS Administrator
 
Sonnie's Avatar
I'm a redneck!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 22,554
My System
Re: Star Trek 2009

Agree... excellent review...

I was among the William Shatner generation of Star Trek. I really have not been interested in it since, but this one seems different from what I can tell and I believe your review confirms this for me. I anxiously await the BD release for an addition to our library.

Cedar Creek Cinema

PremierHomeAudio: Denon, Marantz, Onkyo, Yamaha, Sony, Pioneer, Def Tech and more. Shoot me a PM!
Sonnie is offline  
post #4 of 78 Old 06-09-09, 11:07 AM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
wbassett's Avatar
Bill
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,234
Re: Star Trek 2009

I'm not sure what it was about the engineering rooms, the pipes and valves did give more of a visual 'texture' but for some reason it didn't seem right to me is all. I guess it reminded me of steam turbines not warp engines. Still that is a very minor complaint.

It's hard to really discuss the story line. I don't want to ruin any of the surprises and twists.

"Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler." - Albert Einstein

"If all else fails, spin the cat."- Grzboken
wbassett is offline  
post #5 of 78 Old 06-09-09, 08:03 PM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
Prof.'s Avatar
The Mad Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murraylands South Aust
Posts: 8,316
My System
Re: Star Trek 2009

This is one that's definitely going on the list..

Having been a StarTrek fan since James T Kirk first arrived on the TV screen, and having seen every episode and series plus all the movies, this sounds like it will be an excellent addition to my collection..

Prof..
Home Theatre...the never ending story!

www.dogboardingsa.com
Prof. is offline  
post #6 of 78 Old 06-10-09, 12:15 AM
Senior Shackster
paints
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 100
Re: Star Trek 2009

Ugg...I can't lie. I hated it.

Of course I'm that guy who has all the comics, read all the books, collected all the movies on VHS, DVD and am about to do it over on Blu Ray. Yeah...I'm a 38 year-old Trekker who grew up with the old cast and have grand illusions that Star Trek is supposed to have a meaning in their stories.

Let me back up here. I wasn't opposed to a reboot of Trek after I saw and loved how well Battlestar Galactica was remade. So I did have some lofty expectations going in. In fact I liked how George Kirk was shown to have died. I didn't mind that it deviated from lore at all. I even could used to the new Kirk and Spock and how they have changed when the timeline from the beginning was altered.

What killed it for me was how Shaun of the Dead or should I say Scotty of the Dumb was portrayed. ...even Chekov was botched. He shouldn't even been on the Enterprise let alone be in Starfleet Academy. Timeline change or not. They blew some of the chronogical progressions that can't be altered. Guess it shouldn't matter as Chekov was turned into a clown like Scotty was.

Plot was pretty basic but it had zero meaning to it. I thought the ramped up Enterprise was pretty cool but I agree the Engineering Section looked pretty bad. The Bridge I hated. I mean come on! If the Bridge can be that high tech and sterile...how can the engine room look like it was from a WWII destroyer?

I better stop here because I know I'm just a bitter old fan. I had hoped the new Trek would be more than special effects and comedy relief and have a soul to it.

Nowhere to go but up for me.
paints is offline  
post #7 of 78 Old 06-10-09, 01:27 AM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
wbassett's Avatar
Bill
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,234
Re: Star Trek 2009

Paints I may have you beat as far as a Trek geek!

Had them on VHS and Laser disc, DVD, now on BD... PLUS down in my basement is a 6'x8' by 6' high section of boxes of nothing but Playmates Star Trek ships and figures. I have every ship they made (dupes of just about all of them too) just about every action figure they made... a Spock bust liquor container... binders and binders of I think every Trek trading card ever made including a couple 24kt gold captain cards... boxes of every Star Log book and Trek novels...

So needless to say I have a huge Trekker collection!

The movie isn't perfect and there are plenty of holes. For instance according to Trek lore only the saucer was built on earth and flown to a space dock to be mated to the engineering hull and nacelles. Also the saucer was built in San Fran, not in Iowa, same as that's where the academy is at, not in Iowa...

I didn't like how they all were in the academy at the same time, they are different ages and that part didn't set well with me, but the timeline shift was supposed to be the reason for that.

Also and possibly because of the timeline shift... originally there were 14 Constitution class star ships commissioned and sent out on five year missions. Only the Enterprise returned intact. That's when Starfleet decided the Enterprise would be the flagship.

I did like Pegg though, but agree he was a bit too 'quirky'. Chekov though... whew. I didn't think it was possible to be more annoying and unlikeable than Wesley Crusher, but he succeeded. They would have been better off bringing his character in for the second movie, or... introduced him as a new crew member towards the end.

But the worse complaint I have (bothers me more than the engine room of the Enterprise being filmed in a Budweiser factory in Van Nuys, California) is the flippant attitude Kirk had during the Kobayashi Maru test. He was just way too smug and Abram's 'solution' was pretty lame and lacked any imagination.

We'll have to wait and see if they settle the characters into their roles better in the next movie, although I don't know why the older Spock doesn't just travel back in time (or forward I guess, no back in time... ) and just prevent all the events from happening in the first place! I mean after all that wouldn't be violating the Prime Directive if he changes things back to the way they were originally supposed to be, right?!

All in all though, they could have done worse by the franchise and at least it has a new lease on life now. Let's just hope they don't decide to remake Wrath of Khan... or do anything with Harry Mudd in it!

And oh... does this mean that STNG never happened? Although that really doesn't matter because they all die in Generation anyway and everything after that is just what Piccard is creating as his 'reality' while stuck in the Nexus... Yepper totally geeking out here!

"Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler." - Albert Einstein

"If all else fails, spin the cat."- Grzboken
wbassett is offline  
post #8 of 78 Old 06-10-09, 09:02 AM
Senior Shackster
paints
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 100
Re: Star Trek 2009

You got me beat on the Laser Disc!

On the collection and toy front...haft to call it a draw. I wasn't prepared to show my full on geekness with the collections. The saddest time of the year for me is Christmas as the wife won't let me unleash all my Hallmark Star Trek Ornaments on the tree (yep..I have every one starting from when the original Enterprise was released).

Heh...I need my own tree. Does "Shuttlecraft to Enterprise" ring any bells?

I 100% agree the Kobayashi Muru scene was horrible as well. The whole apple munching and flippant attitude sucked as did seeing Spock teaching at Starfleet Academy along with all the other bridge members being there.

I bet you sat watching the movie just ticking off in your head everything that was wrong/didn't jive/or just plain stupid.

Boy, this is probably the only topic I have ever been negative on here at the Shack. I could go on (and on and on and on) over the movie. But I'll stop.

Real quick. Was there anything you liked about the reboot? I still prefer the adventures George Kirk had with Captain April in the book form (with Jim reading the letters as the backstory) over the movie version. But I really didn't mind that deviation. I even liked how Spock left the Vulcan Science Academy. After that though....it was a wash.

Blowing up Vulcan was pretty extreme too.

I should stop. Even though I have a hard time calling it Star Trek. I guess with it grossing 209 Million at the box office. I'm in the minority on this (farce) movie.

Know whats funny, though? Here is how I would rank the Star Trek movies. Wrath of Khan, Voyage home, Undiscovered Country, Search for Spock, The motion picture, Star Farce and last....Shatner's steaming pile of poo, Final Frontier.
paints is offline  
post #9 of 78 Old 06-10-09, 09:08 AM
Senior Shackster
paints
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 100
Re: Star Trek 2009

Oh yeah....when the devil (JJ Abrams) reboots The Next Generation. I bet he gives Jean-Luc a full head of hair.
paints is offline  
post #10 of 78 Old 06-10-09, 09:10 AM
Senior Shackster
paints
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 100
Re: Star Trek 2009

I think JJ Abrams thinks he's Q.
paints is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2009 , star , trek

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome