| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| REW Forum Trying to grasp Hard Knee House CurveDiscuss Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve in the Equalization | Calibration forum; Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve OK so I read the "Minimal EQ, Target Levels, and a Hard-Knee House Curve" a few times.
Reason is I ... |
|
|
Views: 1054 - Replies: 35
| Thread Tools |
| | #1 | ||||
| Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve OK so I read the "Minimal EQ, Target Levels, and a Hard-Knee House Curve" a few times. Reason is I want to rerun my eq since I added my acoustic panels. They have been in for a while now but I feel like playing again. If my crossover is at 60hz on my receiver how should I go about setting up a HKH Curve in my situation? Wayne responded with the following - Hmm... Well, I guess you have no choice but to do it from 60 Hz down. You might experiment with different frequencies for the low frequency "hinge" - say, 30 Hz, 28 Hz, 25 Hz - to see what gets you the best results. Since you probably want the curve to continue above 60 Hz, what you could do is go ahead and create the HK curve in REW all the way up to 90-100 Hz or so, just as if your crossover was set there, and take a reading with both the subs and mains on. That would let you know if the mains were kicking in enough to maintain the HK curve above the 60 Hz crossover point. The last part confused me - any help on it would be appreciated. Also to make sure I am understanding his article and how to create a HK slope - Wayne mentions - I usually start with the upper frequency tone - So 60hz in my case, and make a note of its SPL reading - say 75spl @ 40 volume on pre/pro. Then play the lower-frequency tone - say 30hz and adjust the receiver’s volume so that it sounds as loud as the first tone did. This will be a higher SPL reading than the first; the difference between the two readings is your house curve slope - so say I have to increase volume to 43 and the spl reads 80. This would be a 5db increase in spl or a 5db HK slope. Am I correct on this? | ||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Even though your crossover is set at 60 Hz, you probably want the house curve to go higher than that. Create your hard-knee curve using say, 90 or 100 Hz as your upper frequency (instead of 60 Hz) and load the file into REW. Set the crossover frequency in REW at the same frequency (90 or 100 Hz). It'll look something like this (90 Hz in this example): ![]() Then take a measurement with both subs and mains running. This will tell you if your main channels are kicking in enough to continue the curve above 60 Hz, where your sub drops out. Make sense? ![]() Regards, Wayne | ||||
|
| | #3 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve In reference to - set the crossover frequency in REW at the same frequency are you referring to the target settings and cutoff(hz)? Am I right on how to create the HK slope? | ||||
|
| | #4 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Just set up and run both your house curve and REW as if your crossover were 90 or 100 Hz. Simple as that. ![]() Regards, Wayne | ||||
|
| | #5 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve So this is what I am understanding - call me slow man this weekend. The first one is 60hz cutoff and your 6db HK curve and the second is 90hz/6db HKC. So you are saying use the 90hz one. Last edited by cburbs; 08-30-08 at 06:03 PM.. | ||||
|
| | #7 | |||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Sorry, didn't notice that you'd gone back and edited the post (don't get e-mail notification when that happens!). Quote:
Regards, Wayne | |||||
|
| | #9 | |||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Quote:
brucek | |||||
|
| | #11 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve When measuring mains by themselves. The sub cal pink noise is a band limited pink noise with a high cut of 80Hz and low cut of 30Hz. That energy range is quite suitable for measuring in the 0-200Hz region. The speaker cal pink noise has a high cut of 2000Hz and a low cut of 500Hz, far more suited to testing mains speakers by themselves. brucek | ||||
|
| | #13 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve OK here are some graphs then... 1 - 60 xover sub only light blue - mains and subs dark blue 2 - 70 xover sub only dark blue - mains and subs light blue 3 - 80 xover sub only dark blue - mains and subs light blue 4 - 90 xover sub only light blue - mains and subs dark blue Last edited by cburbs; 09-01-08 at 03:51 PM.. | ||||
|
| | #14 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Where's the hard knee target curve? ![]() I assume you only took one "with mains" reading, and not a new one with each crossover setting? 'Cause it looks the same with each graph... Regards, Wayne | ||||
|
| | #16 | |||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Quote:
Regards, Wayne | |||||
|
| | #17 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve I used your 6db HK Slope. Here is an example after 90 xover on receiver after filters. Quick though - If I am using your 6db HK slope and prefer my receiver at 60 xover what setting am I suppose to use in the cutoff under target settings - Is this 60 because of my 60 xover on the receiver or is it 90 because of the housecurve I am using? Last edited by cburbs; 09-01-08 at 05:11 PM.. | ||||
|
| | #20 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Got anything showing the subs and mains, using the crossover point you intend to use, showing the Target curve? Regards, Wayne | ||||
|
| | #22 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Not bad. If you could deal with that bump at 60 Hz I think you'd have it nailed. That's the downside to dividing that low... Regards, Wayne | ||||
|
| | #24 | ||||
| Re: Trying to grasp Hard Knee House Curve Yeah, it would be a toss up as to whether or not EQ would help there. Assuming that both the mains and subs are contributing to the peak, EQing down the sub might help, but probably not fully eliminate it. But overall, it looks like the sub and mains are blending for a good house curve, which is what we were trying to determine to begin with. Just for grins you might try changing the graph's axis from 45-105 to 20-130 and see what that looks like. I personally think the latter is a better visual representation of what response actually will sound like; the 60 Hz hump might be one of those "looks worse than it really is" deals. Regards, Wayne | ||||
|