| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||
REW ForumDiscuss No peaks to correct, but they are there! in the Equalization | Calibration forum; No peaks to correct, but they are there! I'm just getting started. Let me begin by expressing appreciation for all the input I get from this forum. I ... |
|
|
Views: 716 - Replies: 13
| Thread Tools |
| | #1 | ||||
| No peaks to correct, but they are there! I'm just getting started. Let me begin by expressing appreciation for all the input I get from this forum. I wouldn't have known about this technology without you folks. And I certainly wouldn't have gotten this far without all the detailed explanations that are found on these pages. Took a while to get all the gizmos and wires connected, but finally got there. Ran a few room scans. I have a sub and a mid-sub. Sub by itself: ![]() Midsub by itself: ![]() Combined response: ![]() The room response is not horrible, but it could use some work. About that time, the whole family came home and I had to pack it up. I saved the file. Now working off-line, I reload the file, and when I hit Assign Filters, I get "No peaks to correct" Do you have to have the whole system hooked up for the program to work, or can you take measurement and play with them later, like I'm trying to do. Please let me know if I've missed something obvious. Thanks Frank | ||||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 | |||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! Quote:
If REW doesn't recognize enough of your signals to conclude that they're peaks, simply lower the target level with the thumbwheel until you reveal more signal above the target and then Find Peaks again. You can clear those peaks and then move the target level some more and find peaks again until you like what you see........ ![]() brucek | |||||
|
| | #3 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! I can reduce the target so the entire trace is above it, but still no peaks: ![]() Would it be worth while to attach a single scan? Can you open it and see if I have something messed up? Thanks Frank | ||||
|
| | #4 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! Hi Frank, Did you hit the "Find Peaks" button that brucek pointed out? It's implemented more like a hyperlink rather than a button proper, so it might not quite stick out. Using Lotus Notes, huh? Don't see that everyday. You can send me a scan and I'll see if I can make it work. I'll PM you my email. -- Otto | ||||
|
| | #5 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! OOOOOOPPS! Nevermind! I didn't realize that was a button. Thought it was just a caption for the Hz range. Thanks, Otto. Now I have all the peaks a man could want (figuratively speaking, of course). Frank | ||||
|
| | #6 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! That error message isn't particularly helpful, but the assign filters action shouldn't really be enabled unless some peaks have been found so I've fixed that for the next release. | ||||
|
| | #7 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! If a REW sweep is taken in the range of 20Hz to 200Hz should I use REW to find peaks in the same range or only up to the crossover of the sub? For ex, if the sub has a 80Hz crossover, do I set find peaks to be 20Hz to 80Hz or should I go higher? | ||||
|
| | #8 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! I guess there would be no real point finding the peaks in an area that the behringer wouldn't cover, so I'd only go to the frequency that the beh. can touch. | ||||
|
| | #9 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! If find, that if there are indeed big peaks above my crossover point, they can still affect the frequency response when I'm done EQing. Because the low pass filter isn't a brick wall, some of that information can still get through, even though it's technically above the crossover point. Suppose a crossover point of 80 Hz. I believe that 24 dB per octave is a common crossover slope. So, by 160 Hz, your bass signal is down 24 dB. That's a good cut, but what is it at 100 Hz? Down 8 or 10 dB? Still a significant cut, but signals in that range can still affect the overall output. A good way to ensure everything's working OK is to do your sub EQ, engage the mains, then measure again. In addition to the any sub interaction above the crossover point, you should also be able to detect crossover point integration problems (phase problems) between sub and mains. Sorry for getting a bit off topic... -- Otto | ||||
|
| | #10 | ||||
| Re: No peaks to correct, but they are there! "you should also be able to detect crossover point integration problems (phase problems) between sub and mains. " How? Do you have an educational link that you can point to? Thanks Frank | ||||
|