Home Theater Shack SVSound GIK Acoustics Ultimate Home Entertainment Fi Audio SoundSplinter Discount Merchant Funky Waves Creative Sound Solutions Affordable Drivers/Mach5Audio

Welcome to Home Theater Shack forums... a home theater forum for discussion of home theater design, construction and audio video electronics. Check out out popular DIY forums for subwoofers and projector screens as well as our famous Subwoofer Tests forum. Don't miss our DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-ray forums including DVD media reviews and the latest DVD releases.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which limits features and access to certain areas. For full access, login or register. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free... so please, join the Shack today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Home Register Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Home Theater Shack > Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration > REW Forum
Room EQ WizardBFD Guide
Register
Home Theater Links Image Gallery Donations Glossary

REW Forum

Filter Question

Discuss Filter Question in the Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration forum; Filter Question Below you will find 3 graphs, the first is the sub unfiltered, the second is using the recommended filters, the ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-07, 08:35 PM   #1 (Link)
 
Senior Shackster
Alias: Paul
Loc: SW Ranches, Fl
User: #3355
Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
aceinc is offline
Filter Question


Below you will find 3 graphs, the first is the sub unfiltered, the second is using the recommended filters, the third is a totally manual set of filters. All graphs have a 1/3rd octave smoothing.

I have two main questions;

1) Why do the filter recommendations from REW seem to be less optimal than what I did manually? Can I improve the algorithm, by changing parameters?

2) I can't seem to get the peaks above 140 hz to go away. I tried various settings. Any thoughts?

BTW, I might make an effort to get a midi interface operational, if an iterative process was introduced that would test, upload the settings, test again up to "N" times trying to get the flatest curve.

Paul

Attachments
File Type: jpg subassemblynofilters.jpg (54.1 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg subassembyautofilters.jpg (53.4 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg subassemblymanualfilters.jpg (51.5 KB, 86 views)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Alt Advertisement
Old 03-18-07, 09:21 PM   #2 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,469
brucek is offline
Re: Filter Question


Quote:
1) Why do the filter recommendations from REW seem to be less optimal than what I did manually?
It's normal to tweak the filters a bit. No big deal.

Quote:
can't seem to get the peaks above 140 hz to go away
Because the sub has very little influence at 140hz. The crossover has reduced its signal at a rate of 24dB/octave after the crossover. The mains are the overwhelming influence by that frequency. The BFD is connected to the sub. We don't usually bother equalizing past ~100Hz.

I like the unfiltered graph the best. Why do you feel you need equalization with a great response like that?

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 12:15 AM   #3 (Link)
 
Senior Shackster
Alias: Paul
Loc: SW Ranches, Fl
User: #3355
Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
aceinc is offline
Re: Filter Question


My testing was with the computer plugged directly into the BFD. No other speakers were powered during the sub test. The only sound should be from the subs through the BFD, so even though my receiver (when it is connected) will be crossed over at 80 hz, shouldn't I be able to control the freqeuncies above 120?

Quote:
Why do you feel you need equalization with a great response like that?
I guess I was looking to flatten out the curve, and make sure it wasn't interfering with my mains. The graphs look much worse without the smoothing.

You may (or not) remember that I have three subs, 2 - 10" and 1 - 15". I spent an hour or two just moving subs, and adjusting volume, phase, xover and boost parameters on the sub system. I have all 3 subs side by side, as this was the best configuration based on empirical testing.

The sub system gets its signal from a Yamaha receiver's sub out (or from REW during testing) that is split into two input channels of the BFD, which drives a NAD amp. The main outputs of the NAD go into the two 10's and into the high level input of the 380 watt plate amp on the Rythmik Audio 15".

What other testing would you recommend? Can I test for persistence (echo, hangover, boom) of bass signal? Of course I would need room treatments to resolve that.


Paul


Last edited by aceinc; 03-19-07 at 12:21 AM.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 06:51 AM   #4 (Link)
 
Senior Shackster
Alias: terry
Loc: bathurst nsw australia
User: #1819
Since: Jul 2006
Posts: 377
terry j is offline
Re: Filter Question


earlier you asked why the suggested graphs from REW were not as good as done manually, and in passing you mentioned that the graphs posted were smoothed. Did you ask REW to find the filters on a smoothed graph??? If you did, that may be part of the reason that the suggested filters weren't the best, (the find filters function should only be done on unsmoothed graphs).

If you already knew that then accept my apologies for a bum steer ha ha...


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 07:58 AM   #5 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,469
brucek is offline
Re: Filter Question


Quote:
I guess I was looking to flatten out the curve, and make sure it wasn't interfering with my mains.
Always test your sub(s) through the receivers crossover to simulate the normal useage and equalize the sub(s) that way without the mains. Then add the mains and tweak the crossover area if necessary.

Quote:
so even though my receiver (when it is connected) will be crossed over at 80 hz, shouldn't I be able to control the freqeuncies above 120?
No.

Quote:
The graphs look much worse without the smoothing.
Turn it off so we can see it without.

Quote:
I have all 3 subs side by side, as this was the best configuration based on empirical testing.
That's usually the way it goes. Multiple subs of different sizes and models is near impossible. Personally I'd retire the 10" subs and use the one 15". It will likely result in a better overall response.

terry says:
Quote:
Did you ask REW to find the filters on a smoothed graph??? If you did, that may be part of the reason that the suggested filters weren't the best,
Exactly.

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 06:26 PM   #6 (Link)
 
Senior Shackster
Alias: Paul
Loc: SW Ranches, Fl
User: #3355
Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
aceinc is offline
Re: Filter Question


Quote:
Did you ask REW to find the filters on a smoothed graph???
Nope, did all the work on the raw data, it didn't even cross my mind to work on the smoothed data. I just did the smoothing for publication.

Quote:
Turn it off so we can see it without
I am still working, will be for a few more hours, when I get home I will post the raw graphs. I believe I saved the .mdat file from the three graphs in question, hopefully that will allow me to rebuild the graphs without retesting.

This;

Quote:
so even though my receiver (when it is connected) will be crossed over at 80 hz, shouldn't I be able to control the freqeuncies above 120?
Should have read;

Quote:
so even though my receiver (when it is connected) will be crossed over at 80 hz, shouldn't I be able to control the freqeuncies above 120 with the computer plugged directly into the BFD?
Regarding the multisub configuration, you said yourself that the raw graph looked good, and it sounds rather impressive as well. The multisub, as is everything, is a tradeoff. Smaller subs used for the upper sub range might provide less doppler distortion, and be quicker. A larger sub for the lower sub range has the surface area to move a lot of air. When they are placed close together they behave as a single unit.

The 10" drivers are Dayton Titanics, and the 15" is a Rythmic Audio, so they're not el-cheapo, nor are they esoteric drivers. They are all good solid drivers in their own range.

Paul


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-07, 07:02 PM   #7 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,469
brucek is offline
Re: Filter Question


Quote:
When they are placed close together they behave as a single unit.
Well, that's true as far as they couple the same to the room. But if you take two subs and they both output 110dBSPL at 50Hz, but only one outputs 110dBSPL at 20Hz, do you see the problem that results?

You've turned them both down to take advantage of the increased headroom at 50Hz, but at 20Hz the output is lower and has less headroom. The expression used when a challenged output is combined with a not so challenged output is that the overall response dumbs down to the lesser sized sub....

Quote:
so even though my receiver (when it is connected) will be crossed over at 80 hz, shouldn't I be able to control the freqeuncies above 120 with the computer plugged directly into the BFD?
Yep, make sure there isn't a dot in front of the frequency you choose for the BFD. That denotes kHz rather than Hz. A common error. that might have been it.

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-07, 10:50 PM   #8 (Link)
 
Senior Shackster
Alias: Paul
Loc: SW Ranches, Fl
User: #3355
Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
aceinc is offline
Re: Filter Question


Well I finally can post the raw graphs.

I suppose if I want to really see what I am working with I should take the subs into the front yard and close mike graph them indiviually, but that would be a real chore.

Attachments
File Type: jpg nofiltersraw.jpg (58.5 KB, 73 views)
File Type: jpg autoraw.jpg (59.1 KB, 71 views)
File Type: jpg manualraw.jpg (54.8 KB, 71 views)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-07, 07:29 AM   #9 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,469
brucek is offline
Re: Filter Question


If the third graph is the filtered response, it's not a good idea to have the dip at 100Hz. That should be a level transition to the mains.

I still prefer graph number one. If that's your unfiltered, unsmoothed response, I would remove the BFD.

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-07, 11:36 PM   #10 (Link)
 
Senior Shackster
Alias: Paul
Loc: SW Ranches, Fl
User: #3355
Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
aceinc is offline
Re: Filter Question


You don't think the spikes between ~68 & 76hz and above ~ 83hz are problematic?

Well the good news is that I can AB test pretty easily.

My front speakers are floor standing KEF's which have pretty decent bass response by themselves. So my thought was to roll off the sub pretty sharply above the 80hz cutoff. I was going to use the BFD to help in that roll off, which is what started the thread.

Paul


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-07, 07:27 AM   #11 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,469
brucek is offline
Re: Filter Question


Quote:
You don't think the spikes between ~68 & 76hz and above ~ 83hz are problematic?
I doubt you'll notice. The main duty of a BFD is to remove resonant peaks caused by the room's modal response. You don't appear to have any of those peaks (or dips) and so I don't think you really require a BFD.

Quote:
So my thought was to roll off the sub pretty sharply above the 80hz cutoff. I was going to use the BFD to help in that roll off, which is what started the thread.
But the bass management of the receiver already handles that for the sub out crossover with about 24dB/octave, (unless the receiver you mentioned in the quote below doesn't have any bass management, the rolloff provided should be suffice).

The sub system gets its signal from a Yamaha receiver's sub out (or from REW during testing) that is split into two input channels of the BFD, which drives a NAD amp. The main outputs of the NAD go into the two 10's and into the high level input of the 380 watt plate amp on the Rythmik Audio 15".

Normally, allowing (bass capable) mains to naturally rolloff isn't a good idea, and usually ends up to be a problem, since you can't equalize the low end bass, (normally handed to a eq'd sub). But in your case (given your rather nice room), it may work for you.

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Reply

« Home Theater Shack > Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration > REW Forum »

« Previous Thread   Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads, You may not post replies, You may not post attachments and You may not edit your posts.

BB code is On, Smilies are On, [IMG] code is On, but HTML is not allowed!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SVS Sub-Sonic filter setting question stevefish69 SVSound 7 02-10-07 03:03 PM
BFD DSP1124P FIlter Chains t35tB0t BFD Forum 4 12-14-06 11:05 AM
Using REW filter info mgrobins REW Forum 2 11-13-06 06:17 PM
BFD filter help dongagon REW Forum 11 06-14-06 09:59 AM
Apply filter - no sound - BFD jeffbridges BFD Forum 10 04-25-06 03:09 PM


Mach 5 Audio






This site is better viewed with a screen resolution of 1024 X 768 or higher!
1280 x 1024 is preferred for the best viewing!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2008, Home Theater Shack, LLC.
John Mulcahy and Sonnie Parker - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED!

Electronics Retailer   Home Theater HDMI Receivers   HD-DVD   Blu-ray

Parts Express: 10,000 Audio & Video Products     SonyStyle   Aperion Audio   Cambridge SoundWorks   Toshiba Direct   Philips   Parts Express: 10,000 Audio & Video Products

OneCall: Your Home Theater, Digital Camera, and HDTV Experts   Circuit City   Vanns.com Audio, Video and Electronics   Best Buy   6th Ave     Buy.com   J&R Computer/Music World

Click here for your favorite eBay items   uBid is the marketplace you can trust!   eCost.com   www.Abt.com   TigerDirectTigerDirect   Once You Know, You Newegg   Apple Store   Be-Direct

Shop at the World's Largest Music Gear Company!   ZZounds   GuitarCenter.com   Wal-Mart.com USA, LLCWal-Mart   RadioShack Logo   Batteries.com for Every Season and Reason   All Battery   BetterCables.com - Home Theater Cables

Netflix, Inc.   Blockbuster Online   Cinema Now   Creative Labs-Leader in Digital Entertainment   Abes   DHGate   X10.com Home Solutions   MCM Electronics - Parts and More!

PC Mall - Great Technology, Great Advice, Great Pr   MacMall - #1 Apple Direct Reseller   Target   ButterflyPhoto.com   TicketMaster   Purchase Tickets   Crucial.com   CD WOW!




Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92