| |
|
Welcome to Home Theater Shack forums... a home theater forum for discussion of home theater design, construction and audio video electronics. Check out out popular DIY forums for subwoofers and projector screens as well as our famous Subwoofer Tests forum. Don't miss our DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-ray forums including DVD media reviews and the latest DVD releases.
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which limits features and access to certain areas. For full access, login or register. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free... so please, join the Shack today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| Home Theater Links | Image Gallery | Donations | Glossary |
| REW Forum Could this be right?Discuss Could this be right? in the Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration forum; Could this be right? I have finally been able to attempt to take some measurements using the REW software. There are some elements of ... |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (Link) | |||
| Could this be right? I have finally been able to attempt to take some measurements using the REW software. There are some elements of this graph which seem reasonable which I compare it to other graphs that represent different sub positions. For example large dips in one area disappear when I move the sub from one part of the room to another. The thing that makes me think that I am doing something wrong is I am not seeing a roll off at low frequencies. Any ideas? | |||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? Hi there, Ray! Could you do us a quick favor and repost the graph with axes from 45 to 105 dB (on the vertical, Y axis) and 15 to 200 Hz (on the horizontal, X axis)? It'll help you compare "apples to apples". Thanks! -- Otto | |||
|
| | #3 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? Yeah, set the axis as Otto recommends and also set your target level to 75dB. Any response information that is below the meter calibration file is not meaningful. Below that, the falling meter calibration waveform (which is incorrect, since you have C-Weight turned on) is exaggerating the signal that's in the noise and making it appear as though the response down low is good. I'm afraid that it's not though. Uncheck the C-Weight box. ![]() brucek | |||
|
| | #4 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? OK, Thanks for your help! I have tried to follow directions but I am not sure I like what I see. Here are two graphs prepared with the sub on opposite sides of the room. It looks like I have some problems of some kind. Maybe room, maybe sub but more probably operator given my slow learning curve here![]() Any further thoughts would really be appreciated ![]() | |||
|
| | #6 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? Yeah, good job on the graphs...... ![]() You need to turn off all the other speakers and only check the response of the sub by itself, using the crossover frequency you would normally use. That means, using the CD or AUX input to your receiver, and then put the receiver in stereo (that way only the mains and sub are on ). Then disconnect or turn off the mains. Then do your REW check levels etc and do the response. It will reveal a lot more than what you have now. I suspect a lot of the problem will be that the mains are a lot higher than the sub in level.... Maybe post another plot when you've done that.... ![]() brucek | |||
|
| | #7 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? Thanks for the help. It must be frustrating answering questions from people who don't know what they are doing ![]() Ok, receiver (Marantz 7001) set to stero, mains unplugged, using aux 1, c weight unchecked. Crossover set to 80Hz. Here's what I get. I'm back to the no low end roll off problem ![]() Maybe I need to take a day off and just re-read (or maybe read) the instructions in the help file. Ray | |||
|
| | #9 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? Looks reasonable (if the sub is capable - as Otto points out). Heck of a dip at ~50Hz. Does moving the sub or the listening position have much effect on that? Tell us the type of sub and whether you plan on getting a BFD? You need one.... brucek | |||
|
| | #10 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Could this be right? Quote:
That is going to be another project. I have been trying to learn how to measure responses with the REW. Once I have mastered that I will move on to the BFD. There will probably be a whole other barrage of newbe questions. Based on my very limited knowledge of these things, it is my understanding that I will need to handle the dips with physical location and can us the BFD to tame the peaks. Does that sound correct? Moving the sub didn't seem to affect the dip much, but I really haven't had a chance to play with it much since I figured out the software issues.Thanks again for your help. Ray | ||||
|
| | #11 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? Yeah, your sub measures quite good except for the dip and a few eq problems. Generally, dips don't respond well to equalization, but sometimes they do. A small amount of gain doesn't hurt, but realize you are reducing your dynamic range somewhat when you add gain filters. Never go above 5dB of gain in a filter. Smart idea to get a feel for REW first... ![]() brucek | |||
|
| | #12 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? raylock, what is your room layout, i.e. dimensions, is it enclosed, can you move your seat location? If your sub is not too heavy, put it in your seating location and move the spl meter/mic to different locations and take measurements to find a good sub location. | |||
|
| | #13 (Link) | |||
| Re: Could this be right? What sub are you using? Yamaha RX-V2500, Wharfedale Diamond 9.6 Fronts, Wharfedale Diamond CM Center, Diamond DFS Surround and rear, Behringer FBQ 2496, Dual RL-P18s 625L LLTs, Dual TA-2400 Pro (2 * 2000 W Amp), Samsung HD870 DVD player, Carada BW 16:9 106" screen, Epson TW-2000, 60 Gb PS3 Important HT proverbs: - "You can never have too much headroom" (talking about bass) - "you can never have too big a screen" (talking about still pictures) Projector selection basics Epson TW 2000 review | |||
|