Home Theater Shack SVSound GIK Acoustics Ultimate Home Entertainment Fi Audio SoundSplinter Discount Merchant Funky Waves Creative Sound Solutions Affordable Drivers/Mach5Audio

Welcome to Home Theater Shack forums... a home theater forum for discussion of home theater design, construction and audio video electronics. Check out out popular DIY forums for subwoofers and projector screens as well as our famous Subwoofer Tests forum. Don't miss our DVD, HD-DVD and Blu-ray forums including DVD media reviews and the latest DVD releases.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which limits features and access to certain areas. For full access, login or register. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free... so please, join the Shack today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Home Register Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Home Theater Shack > Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration > REW Forum
Room EQ WizardBFD Guide
Register
Home Theater Links Image Gallery Donations Glossary

REW Forum

2nd time around..measurements

Discuss 2nd time around..measurements in the Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration forum; 2nd time around..measurements Well after royally screwing up my first attempt at measurements....here's my 2nd attempt... Sub only 700 liter sonosub, ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-29-07, 01:27 AM   #1 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
2nd time around..measurements


Well after royally screwing up my first attempt at measurements....here's my 2nd attempt...

Sub only
700 liter sonosub, FI Q18 tuned to 13hz, powered by EP2500, with BFD1124.
Crossover set at 80.

First graph without filters
2nd...with filters...

any thoughts or suggestions....

Still alittle confused about setting the target..looks like they should match up to compare the filter effect? correct?

thanks
Matt

Attachments
File Type: jpg sub only without filters.jpg (62.3 KB, 203 views)
File Type: jpg sub with filters.jpg (65.5 KB, 201 views)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Alt Advertisement
Old 12-29-07, 07:18 AM   #2 (Link)
 
Friend of the Shack
Platinum Supporter
Alias: Otto
Loc: Beautiful Colorado
Otto's Avatar
User: #625
Since: May 2006
Posts: 1,320
Otto is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Hi Matt,

You can overlay the plots on the same set of axes so they're easier to compare. In the filter window, there are tabs, and one is called "All Measured." Select that one and then you will be allowed to choose which of your (up to) nine measurements you want to overlay.

I would probably push the output of the sub a little bit, such that you go above the target by 5 6dB or so. Then, you will be able to quash peaks more, such that you get a flatter response. This assumes you have the headroom, which you will with the EP2500 amp. Just turn the amp gain up a little and remeasure and refilter.

I also like to apply some gain in the dips. Not too much, and I like to play with it manually, either on the front panel of the BFD or through REW and the MIDI download (either way is OK, but the point is it's me picking the filter values, and not REW).


-- Otto

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 09:57 AM   #3 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
Otto wrote: View Post
Hi Matt,

You can overlay the plots on the same set of axes so they're easier to compare. In the filter window, there are tabs, and one is called "All Measured." Select that one and then you will be allowed to choose which of your (up to) nine measurements you want to overlay.

I would probably push the output of the sub a little bit, such that you go above the target by 5 6dB or so. Then, you will be able to quash peaks more, such that you get a flatter response. This assumes you have the headroom, which you will with the EP2500 amp. Just turn the amp gain up a little and remeasure and refilter.

I also like to apply some gain in the dips. Not too much, and I like to play with it manually, either on the front panel of the BFD or through REW and the MIDI download (either way is OK, but the point is it's me picking the filter values, and not REW).
Okay Otto, Since I set up my system with my amp gain at max, I assume I can adjust my SW output on my receiver to boost the output. I will also overlay and repost. I'll play around with some gains but from my understanding I should keep these on the lower side to prevent clipping???

thanks again for your suggestions. BTW...should my Target be the same for both measurements? seems logical but I have to manually adjust when I re-measure with filters. Make sense?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 10:01 AM   #4 (Link)
 
Friend of the Shack
Platinum Supporter
Alias: Otto
Loc: Beautiful Colorado
Otto's Avatar
User: #625
Since: May 2006
Posts: 1,320
Otto is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Yeah, you can turn up the SW output on the receiver, or you can just turn up the volume knob on the receiver. Either way will work. I'd probably go with the master volume knob since it's easier.

I don't think that Target is super-important. I usually set it at the beginning and then just tweak till I get close to the desired curve. You're doing fine, and on the right track!


-- Otto

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 10:09 AM   #5 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: Wayne
Loc: Katy, Texas
Wayne A. Pflughaupt's Avatar
User: #8
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Wayne A. Pflughaupt is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements



Matt,

IMO your response is highly problematic, to the point that it’s probably unequalizable. You have about a 30 dB or more differential between some of your peaks and depressions. That needs to be narrowed to something workable, i.e., ~15 dB or less.

Often when we see response this bad, the problem is a bad sub location. Do you have any other placement options? I’d try a good corner (i.e., one with no unsealable openings in either wall), if you have one available.

Also, it appears you applied some equalization way up in the 130 Hz range. You don’t have your sub crossed over that high, do you? There’s usually no need to apply equalization above the crossover frequency.

Regards,
Wayne


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 10:15 AM   #6 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
Wayne A. Pflughaupt wrote: View Post

Matt,

IMO your response is highly problematic, to the point that it’s probably unequalizable. You have about a 30 dB or more differential between some of your peaks and depressions. That needs to be narrowed to something workable, i.e., ~15 dB or less.

Often when we see response this bad, the problem is a bad sub location. Do you have any other placement options? I’d try a good corner (i.e., one with no unsealable openings in either wall), if you have one available.

Also, it appears you applied some equalization way up in the 130 Hz range. You don’t have your sub crossed over that high, do you? There’s usually no need to apply equalization above the crossover frequency.

Regards,
Wayne
Wayne,
thanks. I may be able to put the sub up front left next to picture...it's already wired. Challenge is I have my front speaker there as well. It may mean I have to reduce my screen little due to the diameter of this beast....see picture. Currently it is in rear behind the couch. (not in pic but there now) I'll play around with it and re-measure.

Attachments
File Type: jpg Pic (looking at screen).jpg (30.9 KB, 186 views)
File Type: jpg pic (looking back).jpg (42.3 KB, 190 views)
File Type: jpg finished (beside pb12).jpg (34.9 KB, 194 views)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 10:28 AM   #7 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,149
brucek is online now
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Matt - some tips.......

Use logarithmic display and not linear display for your graphs. Press the Freq Axis icon in the top right corner of REW.

Use a vertical scale of 45dB-105dB and a horizontal scale of 15Hz -200Hz.

There is a Filter Sort icon on the Filters screen to order your filters from low to high. It's very useful.

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 04:42 PM   #8 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
Wayne A. Pflughaupt wrote: View Post

Matt,

IMO your response is highly problematic, to the point that it’s probably unequalizable. You have about a 30 dB or more differential between some of your peaks and depressions. That needs to be narrowed to something workable, i.e., ~15 dB or less.

Often when we see response this bad, the problem is a bad sub location. Do you have any other placement options? I’d try a good corner (i.e., one with no unsealable openings in either wall), if you have one available.

Also, it appears you applied some equalization way up in the 130 Hz range. You don’t have your sub crossed over that high, do you? There’s usually no need to apply equalization above the crossover frequency.

Regards,
Wayne
Well,it looks like I limited to the rear. The speaker is simply too large to be moved up front (left). I can move around a little in the rear (to the left) so that it is right beside the cutout wall. Its only about 2 feet but can't hurt to try.

more later


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 04:46 PM   #9 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
brucek wrote: View Post
Matt - some tips.......

Use logarithmic display and not linear display for your graphs. Press the Freq Axis icon in the top right corner of REW.

Use a vertical scale of 45dB-105dB and a horizontal scale of 15Hz -200Hz.

There is a Filter Sort icon on the Filters screen to order your filters from low to high. It's very useful.

brucek
Will do brucek....thanks for the suggestions


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 04:49 PM   #10 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
Wayne A. Pflughaupt wrote: View Post

Matt,

IMO your response is highly problematic, to the point that it’s probably unequalizable. You have about a 30 dB or more differential between some of your peaks and depressions. That needs to be narrowed to something workable, i.e., ~15 dB or less.

Often when we see response this bad, the problem is a bad sub location. Do you have any other placement options? I’d try a good corner (i.e., one with no unsealable openings in either wall), if you have one available.

Also, it appears you applied some equalization way up in the 130 Hz range. You don’t have your sub crossed over that high, do you? There’s usually no need to apply equalization above the crossover frequency.

Regards,
Wayne

Wayne....got a semi-random question for you. Does it make any sense for me to consider a 2nd sub up front if indeed I cannot get the peak/dip range shortened? Still learning here but somewhere I read that dual subs must be tuned the same (13hz) in my case so the point if probably moot because with 8.5feet ceilings I can only go so high with a narrower diameter...just thought I would ask....

Had this crazy idea....Was playing around with Sonosub.exe and it looks like I may be able to get a 24 inch diamter sonosub but the specs would have to be...500 liters, 6.5ft tall, port 8x40, which would give me a 13hz tune.....have I gone off the deep end?


Last edited by Mattlock : 12-29-07 at 04:55 PM.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 05:35 PM   #11 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Here's my graph using the logarithmic display and changing my graph scales per Brucek.

Anyone with more filter suggestions or other comments?

thanks

Attachments
File Type: jpg response graph, both logarithmic.jpg (62.4 KB, 183 views)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 06:07 PM   #12 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Jesse S
Loc: Toronto, On
User: #1701
Since: Jul 2006
Posts: 18
Jman is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Do you have any space for bass traps?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 06:32 PM   #13 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
Jman wrote: View Post
Do you have any space for bass traps?
hmmmm...not real sure....school me a little on what these could do for me?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-07, 10:15 PM   #14 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,149
brucek is online now
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Matt, any chance you can show me your impulse response graph of your measurement?

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-07, 04:58 PM   #15 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
brucek wrote: View Post
Matt, any chance you can show me your impulse response graph of your measurement?

brucek
Bruce,
Here is my impulse graph.....

Attachments
File Type: jpg impulses.jpg (79.2 KB, 170 views)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-07, 05:27 PM   #16 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: brucek
User: #6
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,149
brucek is online now
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Just wanted to see where the noise floor was in relation to the signal.

Signal is ~40dB above the noise. Not great, but OK. Sometimes the response graph looks a bit like yours when there's a lot of noise....

Does your Check Levels routine work out OK for you when you're setting up?

brucek


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-07, 05:31 PM   #17 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: Matt
User: #8834
Since: May 2007
Posts: 88
Mattlock is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Quote:
brucek wrote: View Post
Just wanted to see where the noise floor was in relation to the signal.

Signal is ~40dB above the noise. Not great, but OK. Sometimes the response graph looks a bit like yours when there's a lot of noise....

Does your Check Levels routine work out OK for you when you're setting up?

brucek

think so but I'll double check....what could be the culprit on the noise?


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-07, 05:45 PM   #18 (Link)
 
Shackster
Alias: treeman
Loc: Cary, N.C.
User: #12738
Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
kbgl is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements


Matt.... Forget what I said to do yesterday by PM!


Last edited by kbgl : 12-30-07 at 06:37 PM.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-07, 05:50 PM   #19 (Link)
 
Shack Administrator
Platinum Supporter
Alias: Wayne
Loc: Katy, Texas
Wayne A. Pflughaupt's Avatar
User: #8
Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Wayne A. Pflughaupt is offline
Re: 2nd time around..measurements



Matt, are you using both of these subs?


Regards,
Wayne


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-07, 05:52 PM