IB makeover..........

**brucek** · **04-15-07, 08:53 AM**

Yeah, I do mean (and changed) that the impedance will be riding up and down as shown in the first diagram. Its lowest point is around 12Hz, so the current will be the greatest and so the applied power. The phase curve shows where the load becomes near purely resistive when it reaches 0 degrees. I think the power used will be close to the inverse of the impedance curve, will it not.

Quote:

Looking at your estimate of velocity vs frequency, I would say we're probably only going to get a result for 10hz.

The velocity sure spikes at that frequency. Do the flares allow a speed over the 5% to not create the chuffing noise?

brucek

**collo** · **04-15-07, 06:24 PM**

The science of inductive loads is a bit beyond me, so I defer to the experts on this one.

I do know that when a load contains a resistive and an inductive component, the voltage and current aren't exactly in phase.

If the power delivered to the driver followed the impedence graph, you would expect the SPL graph to do the same, yet this is not the case.

Since I'm using WinISD to do the analysis, and the voltage measurement method was given the OK by one of the WinISD authors, I'll use it.

----

Adding flares definitely allows you to use a higher velocity before chuffing occurs.

This is not as simple as saying a flare of x mm allows a velocity of 20 m/sec

You need to take into account port diameter, flare radius and frquency.

You can also allow a small amount of chuffing which is not heard due to the distance to the seating position and masking by content.

If you follow the link in my earlier posting, you'll see how this was discovered.

**brucek** · **04-15-07, 09:20 PM**

Quote:

Since I'm using WinISD to do the analysis, and the voltage measurement method was given the OK by one of the WinISD authors, I'll use it.

Yep, and I completely agree. I was just musing about this stuff - I don't want to get the thread off track..

Quote:

If the power delivered to the driver followed the impedance graph, you would expect the SPL graph to do the same, yet this is not the case.

Well, I think the fact that the SPL units being logarithmic (dB) have a lot to do with that. Doubling the applied power only nets a +3dB increase in SPL. Kinda smooths the SPL graph out in relation to large swings in power. You could increase the power from 500 watts to 1000 watts and the SPL graph would only show an increase (for example) from +113dB to +116dB.
But certainly the reactive components will store and release energy that can be reflected back to the load and result in heat being dissipated by the output stage of the amplifier itself. The power graph that WINISD provides is apparent power ( expressed in volt amps). This would be a combination of the RMS or real power dissipated in the resistive load (Re) plus the reactive power as a result of the inductance and capacitance of the driver. It would simply be the product of the current squared times the impedance over the frequency range.

brucek

**Mark Seaton** · **04-16-07, 11:54 AM**

Quote:

brucek wrote:

Yeah, I do mean (and changed) that the impedance will be riding up and down as shown in the first diagram. Its lowest point is around 12Hz, so the current will be the greatest and so the applied power. The phase curve shows where the load becomes near purely resistive when it reaches 0 degrees. I think the power used will be close to the inverse of the impedance curve, will it not.

brucek

Hi Bruce,

I wanted to jump in as this matter is one often confused. Despite common terminology and specifications, we drive speakers with Voltage, not power. Power ratings on amplifiers are defined by driving specific, resistive loads (nothing earth shattering here). Real electromechanical devices have impedances that vary with frequency. Nominal impedances are about as precise as a "2x4" is 2" x 4"

.

You are correct that actual power dissipated in the voice coil is inversely proportional to the impedance curve for a constant Voltage input. The feedback from the creaters of WinISD might have been from confusion of terms. "Power" input could be, and by their description might be, defined by Voltage into the Re or Dcr of the driver. Different programs handle input signal a little differently in how you specify it, but the results should be the same when using the same modeled Voltage.

In short, if you want to correlate the driving signal to a theoretical vent velocity, you want to measure RMS Voltage. Many meters are not True RMS meters, and you will have less confusion in calibrating the Voltage at 60Hz with the meter and then using the frequency response measurements of the electrical signal to extrapolate from there. In taking such measurements, do be sure to include some casual observation to correlate what you are modeling and observing. For example, from the above model you would expect to see ~1/2 the excursion at the tuning frequency as at ~20Hz.

**Rodny Alvarez** · **04-16-07, 08:51 PM**

.....................

**brucek** · **04-17-07, 07:20 AM**

Sorry Rodny. I didn't mean to hijack your thread with my babbling....

**Rodny Alvarez** · **04-17-07, 09:06 PM**

Quote:

brucek wrote:

Sorry Rodny. I didn't mean to hijack your thread with my babbling....

Its all good!!!

As long as somebody will benefit from it!

**Rodny Alvarez** · **04-24-07, 08:54 AM**

Collo and I conducted some testing via PM's to save cluttering up this thread. It was concluded that the airspeed was too low to account for the noises heard at 10hz. The most likely culprit was driver noise.

**Chrisbee** · **04-24-07, 05:44 PM**

Quote:

Rodny Alvarez wrote:

Collo and I conducted some testing via PM's to save cluttering up this thread. It was concluded that the airspeed was too low to account for the noises heard at 10hz. The most likely culprit was driver noise.

Hi Rodny

What sort of levels dB(C) were you running at to hear noise at 10hz?

Was this on sinewaves? I'm wondering if the signal you were feeding it had heavy distortion which produced an audible harmonic.

I ran my IB array at 10Hz up to nearly 100dB(C) (uncorrected RS meter) using REW in the "Frequency follows cursor" mode.

The IB was completely silent though the room was shaking violently. I stopped at about 1/4" cone movement because I feared the windows would break if I pushed it any harder.

Are you sure your box or something else isn't vibrating in sympathy somewhere?

**Rodny Alvarez** · **04-24-07, 08:23 PM**

Quote:

Chrisbee wrote:

Hi Rodny

What sort of levels dB(C) were you running at to hear noise at 10hz?

Was this on sinewaves? I'm wondering if the signal you were feeding it had heavy distortion which produced an audible harmonic.

I ran my IB array at 10Hz up to nearly 100dB(C) (uncorrected RS meter) using REW in the "Frequency follows cursor" mode.

The IB was completely silent though the room was shaking violently. I stopped at about 1/4" cone movement because I feared the windows would break if I pushed it any harder.

Are you sure your box or something else isn't vibrating in sympathy somewhere?

It was about 90dbs with only one side, the signal was from the REW sine waves, I was using the RS meter, and yes the house made some real loud noises:holycow:

I went back and listen to the subs at 10Hz and one of the subs its making a noise, its like the aluminum cone rubbing on something

, if I have time this weekend I will check all the subs, it could be a speaker wire behind the sub.

**SteveCallas** · **04-25-07, 12:57 AM**

Your drivers will actually be moving very little at 10hz as that is right around tuning. They'd be moving much more at say 16hz. So I'm not sure what you are hearing, probably something vibrating I'd imagine.

**shr-t** · **06-04-07, 02:39 AM**

Quote:

SteveCallas wrote:

I know that neither of us will start name calling, rounding up a posse to try and discredit the other, ask the mods to lock and delete the thread, start including pictures of scantily clad women in an attempt to divert attention from the main issues, or secretly remove previously attached graphs

Quote:

SteveCallas wrote:

I'm off on a trip, I'll respond to this in 3 weeks (only to never respond to it again), proposing new, unrelated questions in a blatant attempt to get out of the hot seat, questioning the legitimacy of ground plane measurements (cause we all know testing on a 40' pole is the ONLY way to get accurate results

), inferring that an amp's metal casing determines its quality, talking about sick family members to try and gain pitty, talking about drinking martinis to try and seem "cool", talking about how much more money I have than everyone else, and so on and so forth. Each more ridiculous than the next, yet it has become common fare

Hehe, good stuff Steve

**Chrisbee** · **06-04-07, 02:56 AM**

Rodny has been very quiet since reporting his funny noises.

Rodny? RODNY!

**Sonnie** · **06-04-07, 03:35 PM**

Yeah... you'd think he'd hang around with us a little and be sociable.

I know he's been car shopping lately.

**Rodny Alvarez** · **06-04-07, 07:27 PM**

I'm alive!!

I've been little busy at work and home and shopping for a car.

I'm not worried about the noise the sub makes when I played the 10Hz, so far we have watched a couple of movies and I love the end results, you can't even hear the noise when you play music or movies

**tjambro** · **06-04-07, 10:55 PM**

Quote:

Rodny Alvarez wrote:

I'm alive!!

I've been little busy at work and home and shopping for a car.

Um, Rodny....you DO know your SLLT's won't fit in any car you buy, right??

-Tom A.

**Chrisbee** · **06-10-07, 03:08 PM**

Quote:

tjambro wrote:

Um, Rodny....you DO know your SLLT's won't fit in any car you buy, right??

-Tom A.

He could if he had one of these!

**Rodny Alvarez** · **06-12-07, 11:15 PM**

Quote:

tjambro wrote:

Um, Rodny....you DO know your SLLT's won't fit in any car you buy, right??

-Tom A.

I'm thinking of a "SSB" for the new truck

Spoiler

**tjambro** · **06-13-07, 09:35 PM**

Quote:

Rodny Alvarez wrote:

I'm thinking of a "SSB" for the new truck.

Naah...I think Chrisbee has a nice alternative vehicle for you.

-Tom A.

**Chrisbee** · **06-14-07, 03:42 AM**

Quote:

tjambro wrote:

Naah...I think Chrisbee has a nice alternative vehicle for you.

-Tom A.

Yeah, but you'd need a telephoto lens to capture our resident supermodel posing in the back of that!

Here's Rodny's last LLT truck install.

**SteveCallas** · **08-18-07, 02:34 PM**

I found this related thread, and I'd venture to say this issue is more widespread than some would make it out to be

Unless you can restrict that backspace to some off-to-the-side room that you don't really use, you could potentially be pouring bass over large sections of the house.

**WillyD** · **08-18-07, 02:39 PM**

I sent that guy a PM linking to this thread the other day.

**Rodny Alvarez** · **09-06-07, 09:42 PM**

I'm on the Sticky Threads!!

Just want to let people know the most of my pics there in here...
http://www.putfile.com/rodny68/images/33728

**kermyb123** · **05-31-08, 03:40 PM**

I just read all of this on a suggestion to solve my problem, however, how is this set up differnt then a very large ported enclosure? I understand it was at first an IB unit but now seems like a, what; 37cuft ported box built into the structure of the home?

**brucek** · **05-31-08, 04:56 PM**

Quote:

how is this set up differnt then a very large ported enclosure? I understand it was at first an IB unit but now seems like a, what; 37cuft ported box built into the structure of the home?

You just answered your own question. You could accomplish the same thing with a very large ported enclosure, but instead it's built into the structure.

Therefore instead of an LLT, the word structure is prefaced.......

brucek

Advertisement