Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service - USA - Page 3 - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #21 of 368 Old 03-02-09, 12:57 AM
New Member
bk
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Hi Herb,

I've built some mics before, including an ambisonic tetrahedral mic, and used a B&K reference mic to manage the calibration. But I would not mind my own for my home DRC work... I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what you would recommend in various price ranges for a cheap or inexpensive reference mic.

The reason I'm asking is because the ECM8000 is not all that good (eg the bass roll off, which is not in the original Panasonic WM51a capsules, so is possibly in their preamp), even for the price - I believe the similar NADY is better and I've seen home made units which are better. Whatever mic is used will still need calibration, but using a better (flatter / quieter) mic to start with is usually a good idea.

Many thanks for your input, it is much appreciated.
BK
bxxk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 368 Old 03-02-09, 10:47 AM
Senior Shackster
Anechoic
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 397
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Quote:
bxxk wrote: View Post
Hi Herb,

I've built some mics before, including an ambisonic tetrahedral mic, and used a B&K reference mic to manage the calibration. But I would not mind my own for my home DRC work... I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering what you would recommend in various price ranges for a cheap or inexpensive reference mic.
It's kind of a broad question that's difficult to answer, but I'll try.

In the same (rough) price range as the ECM8000 I've measured the Nady CM 100 and the dbx RTA-M. The Nady is flatter to 20 kHz although I didn't look much lower. The RTA-M rolls off a bit above 20 Hz.

If you're willing to spend a couple of hundred dollars, the Josephson and Earthworks lines are great mics for the price, but pricewise are geared for the serious enthusiast. The Beyerdynamic MM 1 has a great reputation and can sometimes be found for under $200, but I've never personally handled one. There's the APEX220 which falls into the ECM8000 price range and may or may not be a rebadged RTA-M.

One microphone that I really like is the Radio Shack lapel microphone. They're cheap, but they are amazingly flat up to 20 kHz and much more consistent from unit to unit. The downside is that the noise floor is pretty high (around 60 dBA IIRC) which limits its use for low SPL testing. You also have to find a way to mount it such that the mounting doesn't muddy up the signal. Caveat: it's been several years since I last measured one so it's entirely possible that there has been a revision and the mic is now.
Anechoic is offline  
post #23 of 368 Old 03-02-09, 06:37 PM
Shackster
Dennis H
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

I think the Behringer and the Nady are both OEM'd from Superlux in China -- probably the same mic with a different label. They seem to have lost their flat response when Panasonic discontinued the WM-60 and everyone switched to the WM-61. I thought it was a Superlux problem but I recently read a paper where someone built 8 mics using the WM-61, 4 with the stock wiring and 4 with the 'Linkwitz mod'. They all had the 10K hump although the ones with the mod didn't hump quite as high. The ones with the mod also had lower distortion at high SPL.

Herb, the Panasonic electret capsules don't really require a preamp like you describe for a traditional condenser mic. They work fine with just a battery and a resistor as long as they are feeding a fairly high impedance preamp or sound card. Superlux is including more of a preamp built in to make them compatible with a pro mic preamp with low impedance and 48V.

I was looking at some measured 5-48K curves for the Behringer and it looks like the tails are more like 24dB/oct. The tails don't really matter for someone measuring a room but they could make a difference for someone designing a crossover because of errors in the calculated phase using a Hilbert transform. As an experiment, I built a fake cal file extending down to 1Hz and ran a Hilbert transform to get the phase. Then I truncated the file to 20Hz and ran the HBT again. The phase error at 20Hz was about 70 degrees with the truncated file.

Last edited by Dennis H; 03-02-09 at 06:59 PM.
Dennis H is offline  
 
post #24 of 368 Old 03-02-09, 09:40 PM
Senior Shackster
Anechoic
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 397
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Quote:
Dennis H wrote: View Post
I think the Behringer and the Nady are both OEM'd from Superlux in China -- probably the same mic with a different label.
There was a discussion a few years back on Usenet (Google groups search is completely fubar'd right now so I can't find it) where there was some dispute over that - I think the mic element was probably the same but the electronics are different. The ECM8000 electronics have changed a couple of times over the years so if may be that they're the same now.

Quote:
I was looking at some measured 5-48K curves for the Behringer and it looks like the tails are more like 24dB/oct. The tails don't really matter for someone measuring a room but they could make a difference for someone designing a crossover because of errors in the calculated phase using a Hilbert transform. As an experiment, I built a fake cal file extending down to 1Hz and ran a Hilbert transform to get the phase. Then I truncated the file to 20Hz and ran the HBT again. The phase error at 20Hz was about 70 degrees with the truncated file.
You have to be careful with using Hilbert Transforms on condenser mic freq response data since condenser mics aren't minimum phase.
Anechoic is offline  
post #25 of 368 Old 03-02-09, 10:03 PM
Shackster
Dennis H
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Quote:
Anechoic wrote: View Post
You have to be careful with using Hilbert Transforms on condenser mic freq response data since condenser mics aren't minimum phase.
Hmmm, interesting. I'm no expert but I can't imagine a mechanism where a mechanical transducer and analog electronics wouldn't be minimum phase. There have been a lot of discussions about that with speaker drivers, cone breakup modes, baffle diffraction, etc. and it always turns out (as far as I know) that it is behaving as a minimum phase system even though it doesn't appear that way at first. BUT.... the HBT is making assumptions and it's subject to computation errors if you don't do things like extending the tails beyond the measured values. You have to do that with speaker drivers and I'd imagine you have to do it with mics as well.
Dennis H is offline  
post #26 of 368 Old 03-03-09, 11:24 PM
Senior Shackster
Anechoic
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 397
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

I've heard it repeated by extremely trustworthy sources (including people who have written some of the books on my shelf and have written ANSI/IEC microphone standards) that it is indeed the case, but have never seen a detailed explanation as to how/why.

The condenser mic is a fundamentlally different transducer than a loudspeaker driver- the loudspeaker is a linear motor that can be modeled by 2-D array of point sources on a plane while a condenser mic is a capacitor of varying charge and their mathematical models exhibit very different behavior (for example the response of the condenser mic is independent of frequency below the diaphragm resonance). It is my understanding that dynamic mics and ribbon mics, which basically act as loudspeakers in reverse, are minimum phase but condensers are not.
Anechoic is offline  
post #27 of 368 Old 03-04-09, 01:03 PM
Senior Shackster
Anechoic
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 397
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

For anyone interested in purchasing a calibrated ECM8000 or who wants their own mic calibrated:
  • Most of my suppliers are out of stock of ECM8000 and won't have a reliable supply until mid-March. I am able to get them one at a time and I am filling back orders but please be aware it may take a couple of weeks to fill new orders. As always, I do take pre-orders and I ship them on a first-come-first-served basis.
  • I normally turn around mic calibrations in 48 hours. Please be aware that I will be traveling on business from March 16 to March 23 so any units I receive for calibration after March 11 won't be returned until the week of the 23rd.
Anechoic is offline  
post #28 of 368 Old 03-07-09, 08:13 PM
Shackster
Dennis H
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Quote:
Anechoic wrote: View Post
I've heard it repeated by extremely trustworthy sources (including people who have written some of the books on my shelf and have written ANSI/IEC microphone standards) that it is indeed the case, but have never seen a detailed explanation as to how/why.

The condenser mic is a fundamentlally different transducer than a loudspeaker driver- the loudspeaker is a linear motor that can be modeled by 2-D array of point sources on a plane while a condenser mic is a capacitor of varying charge and their mathematical models exhibit very different behavior (for example the response of the condenser mic is independent of frequency below the diaphragm resonance). It is my understanding that dynamic mics and ribbon mics, which basically act as loudspeakers in reverse, are minimum phase but condensers are not.
Thanks, Herb. I guess I'll have to take your word for that. Just curious, how could you ever use a condenser mic to design a crossover if it's introducing excess-phase errors? Seems like all the measurement and crossover programs assume the cal file is minimum phase and experience shows they work pretty well.
Dennis H is offline  
post #29 of 368 Old 03-11-09, 03:59 PM
Senior Shackster
Anechoic
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 397
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Quote:
Dennis H wrote: View Post
Thanks, Herb. I guess I'll have to take your word for that. Just curious, how could you ever use a condenser mic to design a crossover if it's introducing excess-phase errors?
About all you can do is trust in your cross-over design theory. That said most pro measurement mics are designed to have a relatively flat phase response up to 15-20 kHz, but that doesn't help you with an ECM8000 unfortunately.

Over the past week I made another attempt to get phase data for my measurement mics with no success. In the case of BSWA, in what I ca only guess is a language-barrier problem, no matter how many times I ask for "phase response" and "phase data" for the MP201, they keep sending me frequency response curves.

Quote:
Seems like all the measurement and crossover programs assume the cal file is minimum phase and experience shows they work pretty well.
I'll have to try and dig it up, but when I first started doing microphone measurements, I used to give phase results generated by the Hilbert transform. When I learned that condenser mics weren't minimum phase devices, I found a generic freq and phase response curve for a measurement mic. I scanned in the frequency response, ran the Hilbert alogorthim on the data and compared the resulting phase response to the measured curve - and they weren't the same. that little exercise scared me straight.
Anechoic is offline  
post #30 of 368 Old 03-12-09, 12:33 PM
Elite Shackster
 
Ricci's Avatar
Josh
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,431
Re: Cross-Spectrum Microphone Calibration Service

Herb,

Do you know what the useable spl limit for the ECM8000 is? Seems to be about 120db or less?
Ricci is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
calibration , cross-spectrum , microphone , service

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome