| |
| ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| SPL Meters | Mic's | Calibration Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get??Discuss Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? in the Subwoofer Equalization | Calibration forum; Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? I've been busy the last few days getting REW 4.0 up on a Vista laptop and believe that the phantom ... |
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (Link) | |||
| Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? I've been busy the last few days getting REW 4.0 up on a Vista laptop and believe that the phantom power supply to my Behringer ECM8000 has died. Checked voltage out and its almost non existant. I am going through a Creative external USB sound card and have verified that my Radio Shack analog SPL meter appears to respond correctly on the input signal. Before ordering another phantom power supply, I thought I'd ask to find out if there is a better choice than the ECM8000. My interest is in testing more of a full frequency range than just the subwoofer range, otherwise, I'd just use the Radio Shack meter. | |||
|
| | |
| | |
| | #2 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Quote:
brucek | ||||
|
| | #4 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? There are lots of similar mics that would be as good and many better than the ECM8000. It just happens to be very inexpensive. If you want something better you should consider having the ECM8000 calibrated or buying a calibrated mic. The biggest variation in measurement accuracy is likely that between mics. You can use the calibration measurements published, but that only gets you in the ballpark and you have no idea where your mic actually compares unless you have a calibrated one to compare to or you have it calibrated by a lab with NIST traceable equipment. You will need the supply for any decent mic anyway. "It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it." -Joseph Joubert Raise the bar. | |||
|
| | #5 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? My ECM8000 had been individually calibrated a few years ago and that was part of my concern in that if I went with another mic, I'd have to send it off to be calibrated also. I just wanted to be sure before buying another 48 volt power supply for it, there wasn't another mic that had fallen into favor. I went all over town trying to find another 48 volt phantom power supply. Never did find one. Wound up ordering one last night from an internet company. Which mic are you using? Wasn't there one Sonnie was getting up a power buy for back last year?? | |||
|
| | #6 (Link) | |||
| | Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? I did a power buy for the Galaxy CM-140 SPL meter, which has a very good mic on it and it extremely consistent from meter to meter. If you didn't already have the mic, you could actually use it and not have to have the power supply. | |||
|
| | #7 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Quote:
Don't forget to test and include the response of your mic premp in the soundcard.cal file. It will increase the accuracy of your measurements (especially at the top and bottom end). brucek | ||||
|
| | #9 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Quote:
| ||||
|
| | #10 (Link) | |||
| | Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Just connect your mic preamp in the loop with making your soundcard.cal file. This will account for any frequency response deficiencies your mic preamp may have. I can't remember how much it was, but my mic preamp was off a little bit down low and it may have been off a little up high as well. | |||
|
| | #13 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Quote:
In this case, when we run this routine, we simply include the ECM8000 preamp into the cable that loops from the soundcard line-out to line-in. It's response is added into the soundcards response to be inversely applied. Below is the response of my UB802 preamp. You can see why it would be nice to eliminate it's inadequacies. It's good, but it ain't perfect. It drops off at the upper and lower end a little bit and the 'detent' position of the eq of the mixer pots isn't perfect. This response is added into the soundcard.cal file, and so when we measure, the preamp becomes 'perfect', and doesn't add anything to the measurement. ub802loop_response_res.jpg brucek | ||||
|
| | #14 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? brucek, Thanks for the explaination. Back when I sent my mic off for the calibration file, I also sent the preamp. I'm wondering how likely it is that they included the preamp in the measurement. I did order an identical preamp. Think I'll compare the mic calibration file to the one on the download page (or where ever it is) to see how they compare. | |||
|
| | #15 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Here's from the download page 5.00 -24.79 6.30 -16.22 8.00 -12.54 10.00 -9.23 12.50 -6.64 16.00 -4.68 19.95 -3.09 25.12 -2.08 31.62 -1.30 39.81 -0.83 50.12 -0.41 63.10 -0.14 79.43 0.00 100.00 0.15 125.89 0.22 158.49 0.22 199.53 0.26 251.19 0.26 316.23 0.26 398.11 0.22 501.19 0.20 630.96 0.14 794.33 0.07 1000.00 0.00 1258.93 -0.07 1584.89 -0.13 1995.26 -0.23 2511.89 -0.27 3162.28 -0.13 3981.07 -0.22 5011.87 -0.30 6309.57 -0.25 7943.28 -0.17 10000.00 -0.15 12589.25 -3.77 15848.93 -7.48 19952.6 -9.01 ....and here's the file generated from my mic 10.000 -1.729 22.055 10.286 -1.582 22.120 10.580 -1.441 22.128 10.883 -1.305 22.025 11.194 -1.174 21.853 11.515 -1.052 21.687 11.844 -0.941 21.527 12.183 -0.835 21.360 12.531 -0.724 21.203 12.890 -0.608 21.065 13.259 -0.491 20.910 13.638 -0.373 20.691 14.028 -0.253 20.404 14.429 -0.136 20.080 14.842 -0.021 19.713 15.267 0.090 19.294 15.704 0.196 18.808 16.153 0.294 18.269 16.615 0.382 17.696 17.090 0.459 17.096 17.579 0.519 16.503 18.082 0.571 15.929 18.599 0.618 15.420 19.132 0.660 14.942 19.679 0.699 14.469 20.242 0.735 14.031 20.821 0.770 13.631 21.417 0.803 13.245 22.029 0.837 12.883 22.660 0.872 12.558 23.308 0.910 12.240 23.975 0.953 11.923 24.660 1.001 11.602 25.366 1.052 11.230 26.092 1.104 10.814 26.838 1.153 10.353 27.606 1.197 9.831 28.396 1.232 9.272 29.208 1.251 8.706 30.044 1.263 8.193 30.903 1.272 7.720 31.787 1.281 7.263 32.696 1.288 6.822 33.632 1.293 6.379 34.594 1.296 5.949 35.584 1.296 5.510 36.602 1.291 5.084 37.649 1.281 4.676 38.726 1.268 4.298 39.834 1.254 3.955 40.973 1.240 3.630 42.146 1.227 3.322 43.351 1.212 3.020 44.591 1.196 2.738 45.867 1.179 2.479 47.179 1.164 2.231 48.529 1.149 1.991 49.917 1.133 1.766 51.345 1.118 1.548 52.814 1.103 1.335 54.325 1.088 1.132 55.879 1.072 0.939 57.478 1.057 0.753 59.122 1.042 0.573 60.814 1.026 0.399 62.554 1.011 0.231 64.343 0.996 0.069 66.184 0.981 -0.087 68.077 0.965 -0.237 70.025 0.950 -0.382 72.028 0.935 -0.521 74.089 0.920 -0.655 76.208 0.904 -0.785 78.388 0.889 -0.910 80.631 0.874 -1.032 82.938 0.859 -1.150 85.310 0.843 -1.262 87.751 0.828 -1.369 90.261 0.813 -1.475 92.844 0.797 -1.576 95.500 0.782 -1.672 98.232 0.767 -1.767 101.040 0.752 -1.855 103.930 0.736 -1.943 106.910 0.721 -2.024 109.960 0.706 -2.105 113.110 0.691 -2.180 116.350 0.675 -2.252 119.670 0.660 -2.322 123.100 0.645 -2.389 126.620 0.630 -2.451 130.240 0.614 -2.510 133.970 0.599 -2.566 137.800 0.584 -2.619 141.740 0.569 -2.669 145.800 0.553 -2.718 149.970 0.540 -2.776 154.260 0.509 -2.911 158.670 0.468 -2.655 163.210 0.499 -2.565 167.880 0.489 -2.675 172.680 0.490 -2.605 177.620 0.508 -2.639 182.710 0.523 -2.895 187.930 0.508 -3.174 193.310 0.467 -3.308 198.840 0.452 -3.419 204.530 0.399 -3.588 210.380 0.344 -3.432 216.400 0.331 -3.205 222.590 0.335 -3.109 228.960 0.324 -3.089 235.510 0.311 -2.872 242.240 0.343 -2.880 249.170 0.345 -2.921 256.300 0.359 -2.880 263.630 0.388 -3.099 271.180 0.369 -3.289 278.940 0.363 -3.478 286.910 0.320 -3.619 295.120 0.307 -3.634 303.570 0.281 -3.695 312.250 0.246 -3.644 321.180 0.246 -3.450 330.370 0.242 -3.476 339.820 0.236 -3.375 349.550 0.256 -3.411 359.550 0.243 -3.453 369.830 0.256 -3.431 380.410 0.256 -3.529 391.290 0.263 -3.561 402.490 0.279 -3.750 414.000 0.243 -3.943 425.850 0.243 -3.927 438.030 0.239 -4.111 450.560 0.216 -4.186 463.450 0.186 -4.156 476.710 0.194 -4.150 490.350 0.192 -4.166 504.380 0.180 -4.315 518.800 0.181 -4.212 533.650 0.180 -4.326 548.910 0.174 -4.377 564.620 0.178 -4.365 580.770 0.193 -4.588 597.380 0.172 -4.736 614.470 0.168 -4.798 632.050 0.159 -4.880 650.140 0.153 -4.962 668.730 0.154 -5.079 687.870 0.145 -5.235 707.540 0.138 -5.346 727.790 0.126 -5.433 748.610 0.122 -5.549 770.020 0.113 -5.705 792.050 0.101 -5.792 814.710 0.099 -5.934 838.020 0.081 -6.098 861.990 0.067 -6.190 886.650 0.056 -6.313 912.020 0.045 -6.442 938.110 0.031 -6.570 964.950 0.017 -6.686 992.550 0.005 -6.826 1020.900 -0.014 -6.946 1050.200 -0.027 -7.074 1080.200 -0.042 -7.194 1111.100 -0.061 -7.336 1142.900 -0.078 -7.477 1175.600 -0.100 -7.585 1209.200 -0.124 -7.723 1243.800 -0.148 -7.824 1279.400 -0.178 -7.920 1316.000 -0.209 -7.958 1353.600 -0.236 -7.963 1392.400 -0.267 -7.951 1432.200 -0.292 -7.888 1473.200 -0.312 -7.813 1515.300 -0.325 -7.650 1558.700 -0.333 -7.507 1603.300 -0.333 -7.346 1649.100 -0.320 -7.212 1696.300 -0.307 -7.062 1744.800 -0.290 -6.877 1794.800 -0.251 -6.689 1846.100 -0.207 -6.529 1898.900 -0.146 -6.432 1953.200 -0.072 -6.356 2009.100 0.016 -6.400 2066.600 0.108 -6.587 2125.700 0.205 -6.892 2186.500 0.305 -7.310 2249.100 0.393 -7.918 2313.400 0.459 -8.584 2379.600 0.521 -9.323 2447.700 0.559 -10.094 2517.700 0.586 -10.840 2589.700 0.604 -11.559 2663.800 0.619 -12.256 2740.000 0.635 -12.961 2818.400 0.651 -13.669 2899.000 0.665 -14.460 2982.000 0.670 -15.307 3067.300 0.658 -16.202 3155.000 0.625 -17.080 3245.300 0.571 -17.843 3338.100 0.509 -18.452 3433.600 0.451 -18.882 3531.900 0.413 -19.177 3632.900 0.403 -19.396 3736.800 0.432 -19.720 3843.800 0.470 -20.247 3953.700 0.507 -21.004 4066.800 0.511 -21.903 4183.200 0.476 -22.762 4302.800 0.420 -23.394 4425.900 0.378 -23.720 4552.600 0.372 -23.985 4682.800 0.400 -24.316 4816.800 0.436 -24.776 4954.600 0.462 -25.208 5096.300 0.512 -25.467 5242.100 0.624 -25.693 5392.100 0.803 -26.352 5546.300 0.979 -27.715 5705.000 1.091 -29.558 5868.200 1.100 -31.351 6036.100 1.090 -32.673 6208.800 1.119 -33.829 6386.400 1.175 -35.251 6569.100 1.201 -36.827 6757.000 1.199 -38.343 6950.300 1.190 -39.720 7149.200 1.204 -41.054 7353.700 1.238 -42.503 7564.100 1.260 -44.119 7780.500 1.257 -45.638 8003.100 1.274 -46.930 8232.000 1.368 -48.296 8467.500 1.488 -50.338 8709.800 1.534 -52.852 8958.900 1.501 -55.163 9215.200 1.485 -57.108 9478.900 1.517 -59.195 9750.000 1.537 -61.711 10029.000 1.493 -64.254 10316.000 1.449 -66.549 10611.000 1.415 -68.947 10915.000 1.353 -71.309 11227.000 1.346 -73.347 11548.000 1.415 -76.114 11878.000 1.362 -79.515 12218.000 1.234 -82.242 12568.000 1.200 -84.762 12927.000 1.177 -87.942 13297.000 1.071 -91.135 13677.000 1.018 -94.015 14069.000 0.954 -97.796 14471.000 0.757 -101.086 14885.000 0.673 -104.005 15311.000 0.596 -107.519 15749.000 0.499 -111.177 16200.000 0.375 -114.971 16663.000 0.271 -118.824 17140.000 0.144 -123.113 17630.000 -0.011 -127.337 18135.000 -0.135 -132.047 18653.000 -0.352 -137.174 19187.000 -0.609 -142.305 19736.000 -0.904 -147.589 20301.000 -1.285 -153.027 Any thoughts?? | |||
|
| | #16 (Link) | ||||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Quote:
Here's the comparison of your calibration versus Sonnie's. I don't know what to think of your calibration - it doesn't drop off as I would think it should and it sure jumps around at higher frequencies. Doesn't seem correct. Maybe others can comment.... compare.jpg brucek | ||||
|
| | #17 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? Who did the calibration, JimP? These are the numbers for my ECM8000, similar to Sonnies numbers, calibrated by the same lab. 19.95 -3.14 25.12 -1.78 31.62 -0.78 39.81 -0.16 50.12 0.31 63.10 0.54 79.43 0.71 100.00 0.77 125.89 0.78 158.49 0.72 199.53 0.64 251.19 0.53 316.23 0.40 398.11 0.34 501.19 0.20 630.96 0.14 794.33 0.10 1000.00 0.00 1258.93 0.08 1584.89 0.15 1995.26 0.20 2511.89 0.28 3162.28 0.39 3981.07 0.67 5011.87 0.74 6309.57 0.98 7943.28 2.09 10000.00 1.11 12589.25 -0.78 15848.93 -3.31 "It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it." -Joseph Joubert Raise the bar. | |||
|
| | #18 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? The mic was calibrated by Wadenhome Sound out of Winona, MN. On the diskette, it does show it being the ECM8K. Once I get the replacement phantom power supply, I think I'll run a test using my Radio Shack SPL meter with the correction file for it and compare it to the Behringer mic with each of the two Behringer correction files. With any luck, the Radio Shack sweep with match one of the two Behringer sweeps. Lets hope all three aren't different. ![]() | |||
|
| | #19 (Link) | |||
| Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? I would not give that kind of calibration much credibility. Here is the response that I got from him when I asked what kind of equipment he used: "The ref mic was calibrated when I purchased it by the manufacturer -- ACO Pacific. Mics of this type are typically stable to about 1 dB per 250 years (or something like that). http://www.acopacific.com/micdetal.html I've had the mic about 10 years. The original capsule was damaged and replaced about 5 years ago." This is what prompted me to use West Caldwell Labs, the one that Sonnie eventually used for his as well. They are NIST traceable, which means that their equipment is calibrated regularly and validated. Using a ten year old calibration file from a manufacturer and having changed the capsule is not a reliable reference for calibration. I wonder how Sonnie's calibration files compared between Kim's numbers and those from WCCL. Did he send them the same mic? Just get a power supply and have the mic calibrated again if you want to know what you are actually measuring. "It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it." -Joseph Joubert Raise the bar. | |||
|
| | #21 (Link) | |||
| | Re: Behringer ECM8000 still the one to get?? There was quite a difference between Kim's calibration and WCCL. I suggest WCCL is definitely the real deal and can be trusted. I have a second ECM8000 and it traces fairly close to my other one. With Leonard's tracking fairly close and being calibrated at WCCL... I'd suggest that the WCCL cal file would be more accurate. As Leonard suggest though, about the only way to be absolute certain is send it off. You are more than welcome to use mine if you would like Jim. I've got to come your way sometime soon to pick up a part at the Hyundai dealership for Angie's Azera. I could swing by your place and drop it off. Of course you will probably want to have yours calibrated so you can have it readily available at any time. I would use WCCL. | |||
|
| | #22 ( |