2.0 or 2.1? - Page 2 - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com
Home Theater Shack Forums
Audio General, Inc.: Great deals on projectors, screens and electronics. Underwood HiFi - Excellent discounts on some awesome name brands. Power Sound Audio designs, develops, and assembles high quality loudspeakers and subwoofers for home theater environments. Visual Apex: The most competitive pricing for home theater projectors... and built on customer satisfaction! SVSound Creative Sound Solutions: Loudspeaker kits and components for subwoofers, midwoofers, woofers and full range speakers! XTZ Sound Marantz Standout Design OPPO Digital - Universal Network 3D Blu-ray Players - Buy Direct from the Manufacturer Chane Music & Cinema Madisound Value Electronics: A trusted retailer and custom installer that specializes in whole-house audio, home theater, Plasma, LCD, LED, HDTVs, Blu-ray and more. Genelec: Active Speakers and Speaker Systems

Like Us on facebookREW
Go Back   Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com > HiFi Audio Components | Music > Two Channel Audio
Forgot Password?
Donations Reviews Vendors

 Reply     Post New Thread
Views: 4732 - Replies: 60  
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-12, 09:10 PM   #11
HTS Senior Moderator
HTS Reviewer


tesseract's Avatar
2 channel view
Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,263
Lincoln, NE
My System
  tesseract is offline       
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


Quote:
wgmontgomery wrote: View Post
I'm currently using 3 subs. A SVS for HT, a Kef PSW2500 for stereo (also used for HT) and a NHT Sub-1 aka "The Octave" (f3 of ~50Hz, so not a REAL sub) on the rears.

I have a passive DIY (f3 ~15hz) that I may integrate into the system. I have 2 channels on my HT amp that I'm not using. I've heard good and bad things about using multiple subs; stereo subs (of the same make and model) seem to be highly regarded.

Thanks!!
You have the makings of a Geddes multi sub setup. http://mehlau.net/audio/multisub_geddes/


"I left in love, in laughter, and in truth and wherever truth, love and laughter abide, I am there in spirit." - Bill Hicks

Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-15-12, 09:21 PM   #12
Elite Shackster

wgmontgomery's Avatar
Gary
Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,492
My System
  wgmontgomery is offline    
I started this thread.
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


Thanks for the info; I'll check it out. THANKS!!


Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-12, 12:13 AM   #13
Senior Shackster

Glenn
Since: Jul 2010
Posts: 761
Beckley, WV
My System
  gdstupak is offline    
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


My mains can go lower than 40hz but I still use my subs all the time. I have several classical recordings that are specifically geared toward playing loud and low (i.e. Pomp and Pipes).


Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-12, 06:59 PM   #14
Elite Shackster

wgmontgomery's Avatar
Gary
Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,492
My System
  wgmontgomery is offline    
I started this thread.
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


IMHO-there's no substitute for a powered sub. The best placement for mains isn't usually the location for a sub. It is, however, a trade-off. A quality sub isn't cheap, and proper set-up can be quite involved. You get added bass (of course) and more depth in the soundstage with a good sub, but sometimes the bass isn't as clean and detailed. Also, I've found that 2 channel is much less forgiving than surround sound.

Given the choice, however, I'd rather have full range mains for stereo (as long as they image well). It also depends quite a bit on the type of music. For light jazz I'd rather hear the details of the bass player; for rock, I like the punch of the sub.


Last edited by wgmontgomery; 02-17-12 at 07:01 PM.. Reason: edit

Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-12, 07:36 PM   #15
HTS Senior Moderator
HTS Reviewer


tesseract's Avatar
2 channel view
Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,263
Lincoln, NE
My System
  tesseract is offline       
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


I am strictly 2 channel, and have had many systems. Never again will I be without subwoofers.

If quality subs are not complementing quality mains, there is a set up issue that needs addressed. Integration problems are not the fault of the sub. Room, speaker placement and listening position are always the the Big 3.

I do find it amusing that the sub always gets the blame for poor bass sound in a 2.1 system. The mains could just as well be the problem.


"I left in love, in laughter, and in truth and wherever truth, love and laughter abide, I am there in spirit." - Bill Hicks

Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-12, 08:01 PM   #16
Elite Shackster

wgmontgomery's Avatar
Gary
Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,492
My System
  wgmontgomery is offline    
I started this thread.
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


"Room, speaker placement and listening position are always the the Big 3." +1

I would state, however, that if the sub is a piece of garbage there's not a lot that can be done about it. Many HTIAB "subs" have to reproduce frequencies >150Hz; that does not make for good integration regardless of sub position.

That statement echos your observation of mains (sometimes) being the real culprit; if the mains were able to reproduce bass down to ~80Hz it would not be such a problem. There's just really no way that a 3 inch driver is going to produce 80Hz-20kHz, and "full range" drivers of that size are not uncommon in some "box" systems.


Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-12, 02:04 AM   #17
Shackster

Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 29
My System
  astrallite is offline    
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


I'm also using a Rythmik subwoofer. Very few monitor speakers will be able to handle to give you truly satisfying bass. If you are using a floorstander that is another topic altogether, but pushing down cabinet resonances is a lot harder with a speaker that has multiple drivers that dig down deep.


Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-12, 10:24 AM   #18
Elite Shackster

Jon Liu's Avatar
Jon
Since: May 2007
Posts: 1,374
Irvine, CA
My System
  Jon Liu is offline    
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


Rythmik subs are very good. I heard a two channel system a year ago with not one, not two, not three, but four Rythmik subs and it sounded fantastic on the low end. Surprisingly it wasn't bass-heavy, it was powerful, quick, and wonderfully textured. I asked why so many subs in a 2 channel system, and he said that it was because any less made the low frequencies feel/sound too directional. Room treatment likely would've been a good alternative in his case, but he also really likes the kick drum punch, and the four Rythmiks gave him just what he wanted.

Odd situation, but, even with 4 of them, I can attest to how fast and good the Rythmik's sound!


Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx

Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-12, 12:36 PM   #19
Senior Shackster

gorb's Avatar
Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 636
fort worth, tx
My System
  gorb is offline    
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


I'm fine with either. I definitely prefer using a sub, but I'm not going to be upset or not enjoy the music if I'm not using one. When listening to music on my computer, it's just 2.0 (I sold my computer sub a couple months ago). When listening to music with the HT system, it's in 2.1. I did plan on getting a new sub for the computer, but I find myself listening to the HT speakers more often now so I don't think I'll bother.


Forum Rules Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-12, 11:14 AM   #20
Elite Shackster

wgmontgomery's Avatar
Gary
Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,492
My System
  wgmontgomery is offline    
I started this thread.
Re: 2.0 or 2.1?


If I could find a JL Audio Fathom at Goodwill I'd be set for life! I have a Kef PSW2500 (sealed design) on the mains, and the SVS is used for HT. The SVS goes much deeper, but the bass seems to lag a bit behind the Dynaudio mains' bass.

I'd guess that most people would be better off without any sub than using a very cheap one. I'll put the Rythmik subs on my short list. I just got laid-off from work, so any purchase will have to wait.


Forum Rules Reply With Quote
 Reply     Post New Thread     Back to Top of Page

Musicians Friend: Your one stop shop for microphones, mic amps and Behringer products.   Cmple   Monoprice Electronics   Amazon   Velodyne Check out the Woot product for today!

Onkyo   GIK Acoustics: Home audio acoustics at its best... especially when you have help from the owners right here at the Shack!  Check out their very affordable acoustic panels!   Nyrius   Aperion Audio   Axiom Audio  Parts Express: Excellent Source for DIY Speaker and Subwoofer Projects!


« Home Theater Shack > HiFi Audio Components | Music > Two Channel Audio »

« Previous Thread   Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Tags
20, 21
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads... You may not post replies... You may not post attachments... You may not edit your posts

BB code is On... Smilies are On... [IMG] code is On... HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off







Bookmark and Share


Parts Express: The #1 Internet source for all your DIY and electronics needs!

This site is best viewed with a screen resolution width of 1280 or higher!




Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2014, Home Theater Shack, LLC.



OUR SPONSORS


OUR AFFILIATES
Abe's of Maine

Adorama



Best Buy

Boston Acoustics A Series Speakers

Cables.com

Circuit City

Denon

DIRECTV

e-Cost

emusic.com

Fluance

GameFly

GamersGate

Harman

Headphone Authority

HDtracks

iTunes

J&R

Logitech

MarvelStore

MCM Electronics

Musician's Friend

Monoprice

Newegg

OneCall

Overstock

Panasonic

Parts Express

Paul's TV

Roku

SMS Audio

Solid Signal

Sonos

Sony

SquareTrade Warranties

Super Media Store!

Vann's

Velodyne

vudu

Warner Bros

Winegard

Woot

World Wide Stereo

ZVOX

Zzounds




Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO