|
Apple iPod classic 160GB silver | 
| Brand: Apple
Category: CE
Buy Used: £174.18
New (7) Used (4) from £174.18
Rating:  19 reviews
Sales Rank: 2531
Media: Electronics
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.4
Dimensions (in): 0.5 x 2.4 x 4.1
MPN: MB145ZO/A
Model: MB145ZO/A
UPC: 885909199037
EAN: 0885909199037
ASIN: B000VBEDQ0
Release Date: September 11, 2007
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | 2.5" LCD Display | | • | 30Hrs Audio & 5Hrs Video Playback | | • | MP3, WAV & AIFF Audio Playback | | • | MPEG-4 Video Playback | | • | 162g Weight |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Apple iPod Touch comes with a 2.5-inch (diagonal) colour LCD with LED backlight. With 80GB of storage and up to 30 hours of battery life, the iPod classic lets you enjoy up to 20,000 songs or up to 100 hours of video or any combination wherever you go. Cover Flow - Browse through your music and video collection by flipping through album art. Select an album to turn it over and see the track list.Enhanced interface - Experience a whole way to browse and view your music and video. Sleeker design - Beautif...
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 14 more reviews...
 My Must Have Gadget September 16, 2008
Mr. Michael Heron
I lost my previous 80 GB iPod not long ago, and I keenly felt its loss, so I bought this behemoth as a replacement so it would at least feel like an upgrade rather than a replacement. I guess the best indication of how much value you placed in something is how badly you miss it when it's gone. I bought my replacement the same day I realised it was missing.
The 160 GB model is noticeably chunkier than its smaller sibling, but not so much you'd actually bother. It retains the sleek, clean design and intuitive interface choices, although it shares a number of the same problems. While it usually works without fault, occasionally there are mysterious crashes and syncing problems that can frustrate. The headphones, while comfortable for short periods of time, I found painful to use for longer periods - a set of budded headphones would have been a nice gesture on the part of Apple.
Additionally, I would have liked a mains charger rather than a USB cable only - it's a portable device that I use at home, at work, and in the car. To charge it, I need access to a computer and the USB connection cable for the ipod itself. It's just a bit inelegant.
Despite this small problems, I still rate it a five star accessory. Of all the various MP3 players I have used in the past, none of them have ever been as valuable to me as this one.
One of the meanings of life! But more gbs please! August 15, 2008
Grozniak
iPod has certainly changed and improved my life, allowing me more listening time as well as providing opportunity to re-discover forgotten gems, thanks to Shuffle mode. The 160 is the best yet with excellent / better sound and more capacity. But of course one bummer is that there isn't really 160gb, there are about 147gb. Mine is already full and those extra 13gb would come in very handy. Even so, because I add about 100-300 songs per month, those 13gb and many future gbs are already booked up in advance. So, an urgent message to Steve Jobs: how about 300gb iPod for 2008? Please don't waste time with a 200 or 240. I urgently need a very big baby! Asap! Thanks very much.
 Great Storage, Intuitive Design, Poor Sound! August 9, 2008
P. Duffy
In the past I have religiously chosen Sony Walkman for my portable music needs. On a recent trip to the US I was impressed by the amount of storage and GUI the IPod 160Gb had to offer. Given the favourable exchange rate, I purchased!
Sony devices have always offered excellent sound, even better battery life along with ample storage. Apple here have completely missed the point. With this IPod, looks are catered for through the unit itself and it's admittedly quite impressive system of operation (i.e. the touch controls and menu system.) Battery life is OK, I am hoping that it won't start to suffer problems like IPods of old! The sound quality however, is somewhat awful! Things do not get much better when using decent headphones either (I have tried top of the range Sony, Sennheiser and Bose!) The IPod simply does not deliver the punch, nor the depth/range of sound that my Sony Walkman devices produce.
If I am not mistaken, this is the whole point of any MP3 player! I did not expect to pay 200 for a device that produces the same sound quality (in my opinion!) as an MP3 player bought from Tesco for 20. Shame on you Apple!
When Sony produce a 160Gb device in the 200 range I think the time will have come for a change.
I have given this product three stars because of it's other excellent features. Plus, I really wanted to like it!
Is it really worth it? August 6, 2008
Innes Murray (Glasgow)
iPod's in general are the best mp3 players you can get with very user friendly menu's. However for some of the "more mature generation" not so big on technology will find the click wheel a nightmare to navigate. For those people I recommend a shuffle as they are just a few very simple buttons.
The big thing i feel I need to comment on is the massive memory it has. This iPod is only for people interested on putting loads of movies and tv show's on this as, let's be honest, nobody would have as much as 40,000 songs to put on it. Anyway you would need about something like 80 movies on this to make it worth it. The 80GB is a struggle to fill up so think about 160GB. Your right, there is no point.
Great quality machine though with excellent sound from the headphones and excellent colours from the video playback
|
|
|
|
| |
