miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD? - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 Old 08-05-19, 03:24 PM Thread Starter
Arv
Shackster
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 5
miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

First post here, excuse me if I missed something obvious.

Iíve been doing some research lately and thereís lots of outdated and conflicting material out there which makes it confusing for DSP newbies like me, I just want to get the purchase over with today! 😊So i can concentrate on the model that I get.


I have a Denon X4300H with Audyssey Sub EQ HT with 2 sub outs.
Ported 12" sub tuned to 18 Hz. (plan to run at 18hz - 50hz) front right corner 16.7 ft from MLP per Audyssey
2 x15" ported MBMs (50Hz-150Hz) up front center, not yet in place, recently acquired CV speakers.
12" ported MBM behind MLP near field 3.5ft per Audyssey (50-100/150hz??? Any suggestions?)
L/R towers with dual 8Ē - crossed at 40Hz. per Audyssey but/or 50hz better to match sub/MBM cross?
Aura bass shakers that I might no longer use.
Sub amps: Dayton HPSA100R bridged, Audiosource Amp3 bridged, AMC2100 bridged - all non-pro for now.


I really want to get the balanced version but the 7.5 ms delay is an issue due to the 13.2 ft. net distance between main sub in front and NF sub. I can scoot up my MLP but I donít think a foot or two would still be enough even if I add another low pass above the crossover point to introduce another delay. I really do not want to use the loopback method because I might need all 4 outputs. Would setting the AVR sub out 1 that goes into input 1 with a distance of 0 for the front sub, and sub out 2 that goes into input 2 with a distance of 13.2ft. to feed the MLP sub work? Of course this needs to be tweaked WRT to the other speakers. Iím also really confused whether to run Audyssey auto correction first or tweak in miniDSP for my case :-(



I rather not spend the extra money on the HD but Iím also concerned about the 96k sampling rate, is this really a big issue for subs? If not Iím just going to buy the HD unless I can get the balanced to work for my application.
I know the HD has a lot more bells and whistles but I have not learned what these things can do, are they worth the extra money?



Any pros/cons I could have missed (aside from the published specs like max. voltages, # of PEQs, etc...)?



Thanks in advance for the helping a miniDSP newbie out!
Arv is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 Old 08-05-19, 06:22 PM Thread Starter
Arv
Shackster
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 5
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

Anyone?
thanks!
Arv is offline  
post #3 of 11 Old 08-05-19, 08:29 PM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
Wayne A. Pflughaupt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 9,171
Send a message via Yahoo to Wayne A. Pflughaupt
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

Are you saying that your receiver can’t deal with 7.5 ms + 13.5 ms delay?

I’ve never heard that the 96 kHz sampling rate is a problem. I don’t see a reason to get the HD unless you need the added features.

Regards,
Wayne



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Wayne A. Pflughaupt is offline  
 
post #4 of 11 Old 08-05-19, 10:38 PM Thread Starter
Arv
Shackster
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 5
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

Quote:
Wayne A. Pflughaupt wrote: View Post
Are you saying that your receiver canít deal with 7.5 ms + 13.5 ms delay?

Iíve never heard that the 96 kHz sampling rate is a problem. I donít see a reason to get the HD unless you need the added features.

Regards,
Wayne
Hi Wayne,
So one thing I'm confused about (might be because of the conflicting info out there) is whether I should run Audy then work on miniDSP or the other way around. IF I should run Audy auto correction first then the distance/delay problem is solved since Audy will set the delays.

I can live without the other features that HD offers over balanced but I want it done correctly with the least cost with this miniDSP implementation. If I have to spend a bit more for the HD then so be it.

Thanks!
Arv is offline  
post #5 of 11 Old 08-05-19, 10:40 PM Thread Starter
Arv
Shackster
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 5
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

Oh apparently, the 48 sampling rate that the balanced does is more accurate down in the low frequencies which I will be dealing with.
Arv is offline  
post #6 of 11 Old 08-06-19, 10:24 AM Thread Starter
Arv
Shackster
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 5
Bump, anymore comments, want to purchase something today so I can have it in time for the weekend.
Arv is offline  
post #7 of 11 Old 08-07-19, 06:31 PM
Senior Shackster
Jerry
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 192
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

If I understand correctly, you have a total of four subs, and you want to use a MiniDSP device to consolidate the subs for use with your AVR and Audyssey. My approach would be:

1. Time-align the four subs. Using the delay settings on each of the four channels of a 2x4, you can time-align the four subs. The 13.2 net distance will require an 11.7ms delay setting, which means the 2x4HD will be required. Use REW's Impulse Response measurement to check and fine-tune the alignment.

2. Once you have the subs time-aligned, measure the combined sub signal using REW. Use the combined measurement as input to REW's EQ tool and generate PEQ filters to get the response as flat as possible. The PEQ filters can be exported and loaded directly into the 2x4HD.

3. Once you have applied the PEQ, re-measure using REW to make sure the PEQ is achieving the desired response.

4. The combined sub signal is now ready for Audyssey room calibration. Configure the AVR for ONE sub, and route the Sub1 output to the 2x4HD. Audyssey will measure, time-align, and apply correction to the combined sub signal.

5. Once Audyssey has completed, re-measure with REW to see what improvement Audyssey has achieved.

I don't think 48KHz vs. 96KHz makes any difference on the sub channel.
AustinJerry is offline  
post #8 of 11 Old 08-14-19, 08:43 PM
Shackster
 
darrellh44's Avatar
Darrell
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Dallas
Posts: 74
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

Quote:
AustinJerry wrote: View Post
If I understand correctly, you have a total of four subs, and you want to use a MiniDSP device to consolidate the subs for use with your AVR and Audyssey. My approach would be:

1. Time-align the four subs. Using the delay settings on each of the four channels of a 2x4, you can time-align the four subs. The 13.2 net distance will require an 11.7ms delay setting, which means the 2x4HD will be required. Use REW's Impulse Response measurement to check and fine-tune the alignment.

2. Once you have the subs time-aligned, measure the combined sub signal using REW. Use the combined measurement as input to REW's EQ tool and generate PEQ filters to get the response as flat as possible. The PEQ filters can be exported and loaded directly into the 2x4HD.

3. Once you have applied the PEQ, re-measure using REW to make sure the PEQ is achieving the desired response.

4. The combined sub signal is now ready for Audyssey room calibration. Configure the AVR for ONE sub, and route the Sub1 output to the 2x4HD. Audyssey will measure, time-align, and apply correction to the combined sub signal.

5. Once Audyssey has completed, re-measure with REW to see what improvement Audyssey has achieved.

I don't think 48KHz vs. 96KHz makes any difference on the sub channel.
Hi Jerry,

I was wondering if you have an opinion on using MSO in place of the time-alignment steps you describe above. I only have two subs in my room (front-centered and rear-centered), so having a program that results in more even room SPL certainly has its merits. However, I'm more interested in getting tighter bass with more TR at the MLP than getting decent bass at all listening positions. Can I get you to comment on the two approaches?

Thanks,
Darrell

Last edited by darrellh44; 08-14-19 at 09:15 PM.
darrellh44 is offline  
post #9 of 11 Old 08-14-19, 10:02 PM
Senior Shackster
Jerry
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 192
MSO is designed specifically to provide more uniform bass response across multiple listening positions. I experimented with MSO, but i found that I was always sacrificing the MLP response in favor or the more even response. I discussed my results with AndyC (the author of MSO), and he agreed that MSO may not always provide the best response for a single listening spot.

So, if you have the time, I encourage you to try MSO, but be ready to spend some time on what is a rather time-consuming process. If you only care about the MLP, the approach I described in a previous post my be your best answer.
AustinJerry is offline  
post #10 of 11 Old 08-14-19, 10:05 PM
Shackster
 
darrellh44's Avatar
Darrell
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Dallas
Posts: 74
Re: miniDSP 2x4 balanced vs. HD?

Quote:
AustinJerry wrote: View Post
MSO is designed specifically to provide more uniform bass response across multiple listening positions. I experimented with MSO, but i found that I was always sacrificing the MLP response in favor or the more even response. I discussed my results with AndyC (the author of MSO), and he agreed that MSO may not always provide the best response for a single listening spot.

So, if you have the time, I encourage you to try MSO, but be ready to spend some time on what is a rather time-consuming process. If you only care about the MLP, the approach I described in a previous post my be your best answer.

Thanks,
Darrell
Great, thanks for the info.
darrellh44 is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2x4 , balanced , hd , minidsp

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome