Can you give a little more info about your room size, seating location, sub location, etc?

 

Maybe change the scale to 5db increments instead of 8db ones.

Like to see the un-EQ'd version of your FR

+1 to what Bryan said.

 

that is uneq'd i will try and change the scale and ber back with dimensions and pics when baby asleep

How do you change the scale sorry?

 

Minor thing, dont worry about it.

Might try crossing over the sub a bit higher, say 120-140hz. This may fill in the gap between 60hz and the 150hz region.

Without seeing the other speakers response, cant say for sure this is a good idea though. EQ'ing 60hz down must make it very bass shy compared to whats happening 150hz and above. Better to try to full the null I think.

 

Room Size is

570cm or 18.7feet long
365 cm or 12 feet wide
243 cm or 8 feet high

The listening position is central to the width and 270 cm from the back wall

I have attached pictures - they show the panels I have made and fitted - please excuse the everywhere - I did not tidy up before taking the shots - the house is still messy from the weekend.

This is my left channel response by comparison

Please bear in mind I am crossing over at 80htz so the resposne should track the line going down as that is the target. Both these responses are speaker only no sub

 

Room Size is

570cm or 18.7feet long
365 cm or 12 feet wide
243 cm or 8 feet high

The listening position is central to the width and 270 cm from the back wall

I have attached pictures - they show the panels I have made and fitted - please excuse the everywhere - I did not tidy up before taking the shots - the house is still messy from the weekend.

This is my left channel response by comparison

Put both channels on one plot for easy comparison.

Please bear in mind I am crossing over at 80htz so the response should track the line going down as that is the target. Both these responses are speaker only no sub

Now I am confused. This FR isnt with the sub? Or is it?

Put both channels on one plot for easy comparison.

 

Both the readings I have posted here are with the sub off.
I was checking to see how the response tracked the 24db roll off through the crossover.

I haven't run sweeps with the sub - I have the sub setup as a hard knee house curve.

My main area of current focus was to try and improve above the crossover response for my front R and L if possible.

I am sure I can get away with a few more panels before the mrs kicks me out. I wondered if a type of panel in the corner (not across) on the front or back wall would help?
Or maybe the use of a specific panel such as the scopus tuned in the front or back corners?

 

This is both channels as requested - I had to use the measured tab in Rew 4 as I couldnt work out any other way to overlay.

Gold is Right Front Speaker, Blue is left Front speaker - again no sub

 

I have been looking at options of where stuff is in my room - I am pretty limited due to futniture plugs etc.

However - Tri Traps look great and potentially the ideal solution - however I think I cna only have one in a bottom corner - picture below.

It is the side I have the main speaker issues which I am hoping may have a good effect?

Having 8 in a room the results speak for themself - however what about 1 in a corner?

 

I really think you should be running your measurements WITH the sub.

Phase and timing play a huge role in how two frequency curves combine. Making two converge the way you are trying to do only works when all the frequencies in question are in phase. With the sub way off to the left, how the right speaker combines with the sub will be very different than how the left one does.

If you want each channel to combine smoothly, the only way to know is to have the sub in the measurement data.

 

You are right there and I will do that.

becuase I was lookign for advice 80 -100htz upwards a lot of that my sub wont be affecting hence why I didnt post full range plots.

I am waiting for a new mic to turn up and when it does I will run sweeps with the speakers and sub.

It has made me look at / think about options for better acoustics which is a good thing.
I am going to make a few enquiries with GIK re a the effect of a single tri trap in a corner and maybe extra thicker absoprtion panels on the rear wall i.e 2 244's (the art panel versions) instead of 1 2inch with a 1inch air gap home made

 

I would put bass traps behind each speakers in those corners.

Fundamentally, room treatment begins with adequate bass trapping, and that almost always starts with bass trapping in all corners. Then treating first reflection points (side wall, floor and ceiling).

Once the above is done, many find this enough for good sound. Of course, the Rabbit hole goes much deeper if your brave enough to take a look

 

Its the corners that I am not allowed to do, they look the worst of all treatments - flat on the wall behind the speakers I can probs get away with - but I dont know whether that will have much effect balanced against the cost. I would do it if it was worth it

Its the rear wall corners - one in particular I have some leway - I could just about squeeze a tri trap in there - the opposing corners has plugs we regularly use and the tri trap would block them.

 

will 1 tri trap make a noticeable difference ? I would think it would but if it doesn then I need to rethink

 

will 1 tri trap make a noticeable difference ? I would think it would but if it doesnt then I need to rethink

Not sure what you mean by tri-trap, but even one "done right" corner trap (floor to ceiling 24" across corner) will make a measurable difference in a room that has none.

Noticeable difference depends on ones attention to detail and expectations.

There isnt any way to forecast the outcome in a subjective way.

 

Thsi is what I meant http://gikacoustics.co.uk/product/gik-acoustics-tri-trap/

I can literally only have one, floor to 4 foot above - not 2 stacked on top of each other as is ideal - I dont think she will let me have that, she is already moaning about what I currently have