Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen... - Page 8 - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #71 of 88 Old 02-01-09, 10:14 PM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
Sonnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 22,577
My System
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

Do most people generally staple it to the frame?
Sonnie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #72 of 88 Old 02-02-09, 04:39 PM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
Prof.'s Avatar
The Mad Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murraylands South Aust
Posts: 8,367
My System
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

Some people staple it on, others just glue it on..
I think a combination of both is the easiest and most effective way of covering your borders..

Just spray on glue to the timber borders and bond your pre-cut strips of velvet to the face and edges..and then staple it down on the back..

Prof..
Home Theatre...the never ending story!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Prof. is offline  
post #73 of 88 Old 02-02-09, 04:58 PM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
Sonnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 22,577
My System
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

OK... so as far as you know the velvet material is not too porous for spray adhesive to leak through... providing it is not caked on like molasses.
Sonnie is offline  
 
post #74 of 88 Old 02-02-09, 05:08 PM
HTS Senior Moderator
 
Prof.'s Avatar
The Mad Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murraylands South Aust
Posts: 8,367
My System
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

The spray adhesive only puts on a thin coat, and the velvet cloth is a closed weave, so there won't be any problem with the velvet becoming saturated..

Prof..
Home Theatre...the never ending story!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Prof. is offline  
post #75 of 88 Old 02-02-09, 05:29 PM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
Sonnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 22,577
My System
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

Sounds like a plan... thanks for all the info.
Sonnie is offline  
post #76 of 88 Old 03-05-09, 03:25 AM
Mark Techer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 613
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

Any further action taken on this Sonnie?
Mark Techer is offline  
post #77 of 88 Old 03-05-09, 06:10 AM Thread Starter
Elite Shackster
 
Sonnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 22,577
My System
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

Just working on the HT room to where I get to the point of doing the screen. I may end up going with an Elite screen 2.35:1, which already has a border.

I will not be doing a lens at this time. I will use the Panny 3000 lens memory feature.
Sonnie is offline  
post #78 of 88 Old 12-03-09, 05:01 PM
Joe Gaydosh
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 42
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

I know this thread is a little old, but I hope I'm not too late to help out if I can. Let me start by saying that I am a big fan of anamorphic lenses, and having installed and experienced them, I fully understand their benefits and drawbacks. They can provide a powerful, immersive experience, and I love that. But there are also some technical challenges that need to be worked out to give a successful presentation.

One aspect (pun intended) that is not often considered is how the screen will look within the room. For a room that is relatively wide like yours, Sonnie, a 2.35:1 screen would probably look very good. In some narrow rooms, you might get a "wall-to-wall" screen effect with a 2.35:1 screen; but the relatively small vertical height of the screen compared to the ceiling height might make the screen itself look small. In such a case, one might be better off with a 1.78:1 screen. There are many factors to consider in good home theater design, and we just need to make sure we look at them all.

I agree with your decision to use the lens memory feature. Not every projector has this, and it is a great asset. And I don't think you will have much problem with brightness or resolution, provided your screen isn't too huge. As for the aspect ratio, have you considered using a 2.0:1 screen? I know you would have to get a custom screen built, which may or may not cost more, but either way it is still much less expensive than using an anamorphic lens. Most manufacturers are willing to accomodate custom screen sizes. By using a 2.0:1 screen, you would have the largest average picture size no matter what aspect ratio you watch (see diagram). Notice how close in size the 2.35 and 1.78 aspect ratios are. Yes, there would be black bars with every aspect ratio, but their size would be minimized and unless you have a masking screen or masking curtains (for 2.35:1 screens), everyone has to live with them anyway. I know 2.0:1 screens are not well known (nor are they a standard size with most manufacturers), but they are starting to turn up in some high-end screening rooms.

Since you have the lens memory feature, using a 2.0:1 screen is an option for you that most people don't have. If it were my own theater, that's the way I would go. I would program in as many aspect ratios as the projector allows.

On the diagram, I selected a screen that is about the same height as the screens in your diagram for illustration purposes. Your screen size might vary depending on seating distance and projector location. Hope this helps!

Name:  2.0.gif
Views: 1357
Size:  4.4 KB

Joseph Gaydosh
First Run Home Cinema
Home Theater Guy is offline  
post #79 of 88 Old 12-03-09, 10:02 PM
Joe Gaydosh
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 42
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

I just stumbled on the Cedar Creek Cinema link. I'm happy to see it turned out so well. The screen looks like a great fit and I especially love the velvet border.

Nice job!

Joseph Gaydosh
First Run Home Cinema
Home Theater Guy is offline  
post #80 of 88 Old 01-06-11, 10:29 AM
Shackster
 
getgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mid-South
Posts: 21
Re: Comtemplating the 2.35:1 screen...

I just ordered a Stewart CineW 2.35 (56" height) for my new room. My first curved screen. Looking forward to getting it in and hung. Trying to work out a way to move my PJ back a little though.
getgray is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2.35:1 , comtemplating , screen...

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome