16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen - Page 4 - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 96 Old 02-22-08, 02:17 AM
Mark Techer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 613
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
maikeldepotter wrote: View Post
But again, will the picture quality visibly improve with an anamorphic lens?
Absolutely, becuase with a lens, your vertical pixel size remains the same for all ARs as does the useage.

The image you see is made up of by the total (X) number of pixels on the panel, so why not max them all the time - a lens will let you do that, where zooming can not becuase you throw at least 25% of the vertical rez away.

If you have a 1080 projector and CIH, when watching 16:9 you have 1080 vertical pixels being used, and when watching Scope using the lens, you will also have 1080 vertical pixels being used. The best way to describe the CIH image is "dense", but in the end, seeing is believing...

Mark
Mark Techer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 96 Old 02-22-08, 03:34 AM
Shackster
Maikel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 77
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
Prof. wrote: View Post
Just to add to that...

The whole idea of having a Scope setup is not just to remove the black bars, but to have that very wide screen image...Like you see in the Cinema...that really immerses you in the action on the screen..

It is generally accepted that the minimum width for a scope screen is 8' wide, with 9' being ideal if your room is large enough..
Anything smaller is not going to give you the same effect, and if 2 Metres is your maximum size you are able to fit or have in the room..then it probably isn't worth the additional costs involved..
Your are stepping on my soul Prof! Putting so much time and effort in building my dream HT and now hearing that my screen is too small to ever reach the Cinema feeling....

But seriously, does the immersive feeling not more depend on the actual viewing angle (viewing distance : screen height ratio), than solely on the screen width? If I am sitting on the last row of a Cinema with a huge screen I have a much lesser immersive feeling than sitting 2,5 metre away from my 2 metre wide screen.

Could the generally accepted minimum width of 8' has to do with the assumption that you are not building your HT for just one or two people (little place within optimal viewing boundaries)? Because that is what I have done.

The other possibility I can think of is that there exists someting like a minimal viewing distance in order not to put too much strain on your eyes to focus on the screen. I just never heard or read about such a phenomenon. Am curious though if anyone has more info on this, or other factors that influence the immersive sensation we are talking about here.
maikeldepotter is offline  
post #33 of 96 Old 02-22-08, 04:06 AM
Mark Techer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 613
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
maikeldepotter wrote: View Post
But seriously, does the immersive feeling not more depend on the actual viewing angle (viewing distance : screen height ratio), than solely on the screen width? If I am sitting on the last row of a Cinema with a huge screen I have a much lesser immersive feeling than sitting 2,5 metre away from my 2 metre wide screen.
This is correct and why I am happy watching scope on a 2.4m wide screen the same as watching scope on a 3.5m wide screen. If your seated between 2x and 3x the image height, screen size has no real bearing...
Quote:
Could the generally accepted minimum width of 8' has to do with the assumption that you are not building your HT for just one or two people (little place within optimal viewing boundaries)? Because that is what I have done.
an 8' screen Scope screen is still a good height. If your screen gets to narrow, then you might not ecperience the "big screen" effect, but as I said above, seating distances still apply here...
Quote:
The other possibility I can think of is that there exists someting like a minimal viewing distance in order not to put too much strain on your eyes to focus on the screen. I just never heard or read about such a phenomenon. Am curious though if anyone has more info on this, or other factors that influence the immersive sensation we are talking about here.
2x the image height is the minimum and 4x the maximum. The so called "Preferred Angle of 36 degrees" is the same as 3.68x the image height...

Mark
Mark Techer is offline  
 
post #34 of 96 Old 02-22-08, 08:08 AM
Shackster
Maikel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 77
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
Mark Techer wrote: View Post
This is correct and why I am happy watching scope on a 2.4m wide screen the same as watching scope on a 3.5m wide screen. If your seated between 2x and 3x the image height, screen size has no real bearing...
Thanks Mark, that is the answer I was hoping for with my "only" 2.03m wide screen.

Quote:
Mark Techer wrote: View Post
2x the image height is the minimum and 4x the maximum. The so called "Preferred Angle of 36 degrees" is the same as 3.68x the image height...
OK, that's an easy one to remember: 36 degrees = 3.7x the image height (personally I like to sit closer to the screen, at about 2.8x to 3x).

Now, the issue I wanted to put forward is this:

If the "preferred" seating distance is 3.7 x the image height, I can theoretically have a "immersed" sensation looking at a 10 inch wide high resolution screen at a viewing distance of 15.5 inch. However, the focus effort for my eyes wil will be like reading a book . This is a different feeling than staring into a distance like in a very big cinema .

The question I want to put to the forum is:

Does the viewing distance and resulting focus effort for your eyes has a significant impact on the movie viewing experience, especially with regard to the "immersed feeling" effect. I think it does not. Please comment

PS Yes, I like Smilies.
maikeldepotter is offline  
post #35 of 96 Old 02-22-08, 08:29 AM
Mark Techer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 613
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

What you will find is that your eyes will probably strain more watching HD on PC monitor at 3x the image height than watching the same program on a screen that is over 2m tall. In this case, it not the size of the image, but the distance to the image that must be taken into account. I think you will find however that the "immersion" is reduced becuase the smaller screen size, but your field of view (what you actually see) should be about the same.

Hope that makes sense...

Mark
Mark Techer is offline  
post #36 of 96 Old 02-22-08, 05:34 PM Thread Starter
HTS Senior Moderator
 
Prof.'s Avatar
The Mad Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murraylands South Aust
Posts: 8,367
My System
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
maikeldepotter wrote: View Post
Could the generally accepted minimum width of 8' has to do with the assumption that you are not building your HT for just one or two people (little place within optimal viewing boundaries)? Because that is what I have done.
Maikel...Sorry if I quashed your ideas on the screen size..

It's a bit like TV sizes...You buy a 36" tv and put it in your living room and it looks big!!..
Then after some time you start to think "this tv is not all that big, I think I need to get a 42" screen"..

And that's how it goes with projection screens as well..

I built my theatre for just me! (I'm a free man) and I made an 8' wide Scope screen..
When I first projected onto it with the anamorphic set up, it looked BIG!!...I sit 9'6" from the screen..
Now after just 6 months..It's not looking so big!

I'm about to make up a new screen, using a different finish than my current screen, and I'm tempted to make it even bigger, in fact another foot wider!!...
Do you see my point?

I can practically guarantee you that if you go with an anamorphic set up, you will not be happy for very long with a 2 Metre wide screen...

Prof..
Home Theatre...the never ending story!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Prof. is offline  
post #37 of 96 Old 02-24-08, 04:37 AM
Shackster
Maikel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 77
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
Prof. wrote: View Post
Maikel...Sorry if I quashed your ideas on the screen size..

It's a bit like TV sizes...You buy a 36" tv and put it in your living room and it looks big!!..
Then after some time you start to think "this tv is not all that big, I think I need to get a 42" screen"..

And that's how it goes with projection screens as well..

I built my theatre for just me! (I'm a free man) and I made an 8' wide Scope screen..
When I first projected onto it with the anamorphic set up, it looked BIG!!...I sit 9'6" from the screen..
Now after just 6 months..It's not looking so big!

I'm about to make up a new screen, using a different finish than my current screen, and I'm tempted to make it even bigger, in fact another foot wider!!...
Do you see my point?

I can practically guarantee you that if you go with an anamorphic set up, you will not be happy for very long with a 2 Metre wide screen...
I see you point Prof. I am convinced In the end it all comes down to the same conclusion: Size does matter, the bigger the better!

Thus, when creating your HT you should try to make the screen as big as your possibilities permit (room and financial wise). Since we are talking about Home Cinema on this forum, let's say the maximum height you can achieve is 8' (2.45m), resulting in a maximum screen width of 19' (5.80m) . Your minimum viewing distance lies around 16' (4.9m).

So if you have a room of measuring 20'x20' (6mx6m) or more, why stick to a procliamed ideal 9', and not go for 19' wide?
maikeldepotter is offline  
post #38 of 96 Old 02-24-08, 04:45 AM
Mark Techer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 613
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
Since we are talking about Home Cinema on this forum, let's say the maximum height you can achieve is 8' (2.45m), resulting in a maximum screen width of 19' (5.80m) . Your minimum viewing distance lies around 16' (4.9m).
Yes, 2x the image height is the closest you want to be regardless of screen size with 3x being preferred...

Quote:
So if you have a room of measuring 20'x20' (6mx6m) or more, why stick to a procliamed ideal 9', and not go for 19' wide?
Because 12 feet wide is about the largest you can have in a 20 foot deep room.

Formula is -
20 / 3.68 x 2.37 = 12.88

Mark
Mark Techer is offline  
post #39 of 96 Old 02-24-08, 05:06 AM
Shackster
Maikel
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 77
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
Mark Techer wrote: View Post
Because 12 feet wide is about the largest you can have in a 20 foot deep room.

Formula is -
20 / 3.68 x 2.37 = 12.88

Mark
Thanks for pointing this out Mark. So, the ideal HT room measures 20' (6m) wide and 30' (9m) deep, permitting a 19' wide screen. Am I right?

PS I am just trying to get things really clear here, not only for the theoretical sake. I have friend who is buiding a new house and I like to give him the best advice on how to prepare his own HT.
maikeldepotter is offline  
post #40 of 96 Old 02-24-08, 06:14 AM
Mark Techer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 613
Re: 16:9 Screen Vs. 2.37:1 CIH Screen

Quote:
maikeldepotter wrote: View Post
Thanks for pointing this out Mark. So, the ideal HT room measures 20' (6m) wide and 30' (9m) deep, permitting a 19' wide screen. Am I right?
Actually the ideal room also requires careful consideration for room acoustics as well.

For example, a room's length should never be greater than 3x times the height, which is why you see room ratios like 1.0:1.6:2.3.

Then you still have to take the screen height saeating distance into account...

Mark
Mark Techer is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
169 , cih , screen

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome