10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite? - Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 29 Old 04-04-12, 07:18 PM Thread Starter
Shackster
JJ
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 25
10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

Hi all,

I have a 142" Black Diamond 2.4 aspect 1.4 gain screen now and want to go bigger. I only sit 16' from my screen now and will be sitting about 15' from the 174" diagonal that I wish to purchase. I have an Epson 6010 and need an AT Screen if I want to fit that large of a screen into my room with my mains behind it.
I have read lots of interesting reviews on several different screens here, thanks for all the work, and still have to ask, how much of a difference is there between a 10,000.00 Stewart and a 3,000.00 Da Lite? The Stewart is a 174" diagonal CineW with UltraMatte 150 micro perf, curved, fixed screen and the Da Lite is a 174" Da Snap HD Progressive 1.1 perf, curved fixed screen or the same Da Lite but with a perf cinema vision fabric for a couple grand more. I know that Da Lite frame is of considerably less quality than the Stewart's but what a difference in price. I have asked for samples of said materials but am I paying for the name with the Stewart or what can make that much of a difference in price?
Any suggestions are welcome. I should mention that I want this to be the last screen I buy and it needs to be good for 4K.

John:

Last edited by studlygoorite; 04-04-12 at 07:32 PM.
studlygoorite is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 29 Old 04-05-12, 01:02 PM
Senior Shackster
 
HTip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 433
My System
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

You want to go from 142" to 174"? I think 142" is huge already

It's certainly a big price difference. I have a Stewart fixed screen and the quality of frame and screen is outstanding. The gain of the screen material is the same everywhere, so you don't get a uneven color balance. Your material has a 1.5 gain in contrast to the Da Lite which is 1.1 so I guess that counts for some of the difference. The perf material is also very expensive if you want true acoustic transparancy. I'm not familiar with Da Lite so I can't comment on the quality.

But why do you want such a large screen? If you look at this calculator (http://www.projectorcentral.com/Epso...ulator-pro.htm) the recommended seating position for a 174" screen is between 18' and 28'. At 15' the recommended screen size is 152" or smaller.

One more thing to consider. If you want the screen to display 3D then the gain should probably be even higher. Stewart has special 3D material I'm not aware of any special requirements for 4K...


PS Audio Marantz Oppo ALR/Jordan Velodyne inakustik Furutech JVC Stewart

Chamber of Dreams

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

HTip is offline  
post #3 of 29 Old 04-05-12, 02:27 PM Thread Starter
Shackster
JJ
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 25
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

I sit in front of the 142" and the Wow factor is gone, my friends even have the same size, it is time for me to be the biggest again.
As for the throw, not sure how much that counts as I have zoomed my projector out to 180" and the picture still looks good enough for me.....huge!!! I'll get the samples and go from there, I was just shocked at the price difference. If I can save a few grand and still have good quality, why not I say.
studlygoorite is offline  
 
post #4 of 29 Old 04-05-12, 07:01 PM
Moderator Emeritus
Don
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central PA
Posts: 3,772
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

JJ, unless you are in a totally dark theater with dark colored room surfaces and no ambient light whatsoever you are going to take a huge contrast hit in your image by going from a Black Diamond gray screen to a white screen no matter what the gain of the new screen is. Would this be acceptable to you?
Harpmaker is offline  
post #5 of 29 Old 04-05-12, 08:21 PM Thread Starter
Shackster
JJ
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 25
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

Quote:
Harpmaker wrote: View Post
JJ, unless you are in a totally dark theater with dark colored room surfaces and no ambient light whatsoever you are going to take a huge contrast hit in your image by going from a Black Diamond gray screen to a white screen no matter what the gain of the new screen is. Would this be acceptable to you?
I have considered that as my brother has a Stewart Firehawk I think, and I tried to get him to purchase the Black Diamond off of me as his picture is washed out quite a bit with ambient light. My very first screen was a Da Lite 1.1 gain 106" and the difference the BD made when I purchased it was unbelievable. So really, no, I never considered it that much as I do watch the projector with lights off but now that you mention it maybe I should go somewhere in between. I have Da Lite samples of their Cinema Vision, High Contrast Cinema perf, HD Progressive 1.1 perf and a Stewart sample of the CineW with UltraMatte 150 microperf coming soon. Is there another that you can suggest?

John
studlygoorite is offline  
post #6 of 29 Old 04-06-12, 03:04 AM
Senior Shackster
 
HTip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 433
My System
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

Quote:
studlygoorite wrote: View Post
I sit in front of the 142" and the Wow factor is gone, my friends even have the same size, it is time for me to be the biggest again.
As for the throw, not sure how much that counts as I have zoomed my projector out to 180" and the picture still looks good enough for me.....huge!!! I'll get the samples and go from there, I was just shocked at the price difference. If I can save a few grand and still have good quality, why not I say.
You're certainly right about saving money

The picture quality is best when the lens is in the middle of the zoom range. In your case with the 174" screen that would be somewhere around 23'. Problem is, however, that it all depends on the gain of your screen. With 1.5 gain recommended mounting is somewhere around 25'.

Why did you choose Ultramatte and not Studiotek? What is the size of your room?


PS Audio Marantz Oppo ALR/Jordan Velodyne inakustik Furutech JVC Stewart

Chamber of Dreams

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

HTip is offline  
post #7 of 29 Old 04-06-12, 08:45 AM Thread Starter
Shackster
JJ
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 25
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

Quote:
HTip wrote: View Post
You're certainly right about saving money

The picture quality is best when the lens is in the middle of the zoom range. In your case with the 174" screen that would be somewhere around 23'. Problem is, however, that it all depends on the gain of your screen. With 1.5 gain recommended mounting is somewhere around 25'.

Why did you choose Ultramatte and not Studiotek? What is the size of your room?
The Ultramatte was suggested to me by a sales person, not a Stewart sales person. My room is 16'x21', but with an AT screen my projector would be 15/16 feet from screen. I realize I am going to have to give up some quality to go that large that close but 4K in my price range is just around the corner. Are you suggesting that Studiotek may be bettter suited for me?
studlygoorite is offline  
post #8 of 29 Old 04-06-12, 11:07 AM
Senior Shackster
 
HTip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 433
My System
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

Nice dimensions for a cinema. I think a lower gain screen is better for your projector. It has such a high light output (2400 lumens) that a negative gain screen (<1.0) probably would be even better. Especially is you're planning to mount the projector so close to the screen.

By way of comparison, my projector's (JVC RS25) light output is 900 lumens, it is mounted at 14'7" and my 110" screen is 1.3 gain. Frankly that is bright enough for me

If you take a look at the calculator I posted you can "play around" with the different parameters. For an accurate advice on screen size I further recommend the calculator from Epson (http://www.epson.com/alf_upload/land...ce-calculator/).


PS Audio Marantz Oppo ALR/Jordan Velodyne inakustik Furutech JVC Stewart

Chamber of Dreams

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

HTip is offline  
post #9 of 29 Old 04-07-12, 01:35 PM
Shackster
Eric
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 55
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

I am not a big fan of perf screens. You should get some samples of SMX and Seymour AT 4k screens. I am not sure on the SMX costs, but I thought Cris told me he was pretty price competitive. I may have mentioned it before, but at Cedia myself and another person walked up to the Seymour 4k screen and thought it was a solid screen.

Unfortunately the pic attached is highly compressed, but it may give you somewhat of an idea on the screens. Centerstage XD is on the left and 4k on the right.
Attached Thumbnails
10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?-p1010421b.jpg  

Ericglo is offline  
post #10 of 29 Old 04-07-12, 02:51 PM Thread Starter
Shackster
JJ
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 25
Re: 10,000.00 Stewart or 3,000.00 Da Lite?

Quote:
Ericglo wrote: View Post
I am not a big fan of perf screens. You should get some samples of SMX and Seymour AT 4k screens. I am not sure on the SMX costs, but I thought Cris told me he was pretty price competitive. I may have mentioned it before, but at Cedia myself and another person walked up to the Seymour 4k screen and thought it was a solid screen.

Unfortunately the pic attached is highly compressed, but it may give you somewhat of an idea on the screens. Centerstage XD is on the left and 4k on the right.
Thanks for this Ericglo, unfortunately SMX did not return my e-mail 2 weeks ago and I was interested in the Seymour, maybe I will get some info on a 174" from them also.
studlygoorite is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
10 , da , lite , stewart

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome