Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
02-02-13 01:14 PM
AudiocRaver
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Thanks for the detail. I was wondering if there might be an actual compressor/limiter function built into the signal processing somewhere to protect the driver. Shows how much I still have to learn about subs.
02-02-13 12:49 PM
theJman
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Quote:
AudiocRaver wrote: View Post
1. It would seem that there should be a direct relationship between the compression measurements and harmonic distortion, i.e. as the measurement level reaches onset of compression, harmonic distortion would also be going through the roof. Does this appear to be the case? If so, is there any value in correlating the two as a measurements sanity check of some sort? If there is no such correlation, what am I missing?
To add to Dales comments...

You can almost look at compression as "when does it stop getting louder". The deeper the bass goes the more it requires from the amp and driver, that's why you'll most often see the compression occur on the lower notes first. But that "collapse" in the linear response curve doesn't always mean distortion.

A lot of budget subs don't have effective limiters, so they'll just keep getting louder until you either can't handle the dreadful sound from all the distortion or they self destruct. But the better subs will use a DSP (Digital Sound Processor) to 'tailor' the frequency and compression response. Using Dales example of the SB-13 Ultra it appears the SVS engineers decided to start limiting the volume/output before the driver produces distortion. That essentially means it won't get any louder at certain frequencies, but it won't sound like garbage either. Makes the parts last longer too, which for me is always preferable.
02-02-13 07:11 AM
Dale Rasco
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Quote:
AudiocRaver wrote: View Post
1. It would seem that there should be a direct relationship between the compression measurements and harmonic distortion, i.e. as the measurement level reaches onset of compression, harmonic distortion would also be going through the roof. Does this appear to be the case? If so, is there any value in correlating the two as a measurements sanity check of some sort? If there is no such correlation, what am I missing?
Thanks for the questions. The relationship between the compression measurement and THD measurements are based on the THD measurements being taken at the same time. Compression is not necessarily indicative of high distortion. Take the SVS SB-13 Ultra, which is an awesome sub by the way, if you look at the Max output before compression you can see that the signal falls on itself at around 80Hz but the THD at that point was only 2%. So compression does not necessarily indicate higher distortion is present.

Quote:
AudiocRaver wrote: View Post
2. As I see it, your measurements are half-space measurements, due to obvious physical limitations. How does that compare to typical manufacturer's measurement methods and specifications for subs? It is clearly a restatement of the obvious that whole space versus half space versus quarter space versus corner loading would have a big effect on frequency response measurements for a sub. Is there any industry-standard for how manufacturers approach this, and what is your feeling for how it affects your ability to correlate your measurements with manufacturers specs and measurements?
Normally most manufacturers will only post their response but not the actual measurement graph. It has been my experience thus far that those that do not post graphs usually post their frequency response then a typical in-room response. I am starting to get in the habit of taking an in room measurement to add to the tests or review.
02-02-13 05:09 AM
AudiocRaver
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Dale,

I am in catch-up mode here, have read through the thread, and clearly have soooooooo much to learn about subs and sub testing. What an amazing resource you are providing.

Two questions, and beg pardon if they were covered and I missed them, or if they totally miss the mark somehow:

1. It would seem that there should be a direct relationship between the compression measurements and harmonic distortion, i.e. as the measurement level reaches onset of compression, harmonic distortion would also be going through the roof. Does this appear to be the case? If so, is there any value in correlating the two as a measurements sanity check of some sort? If there is no such correlation, what am I missing?

2. As I see it, your measurements are half-space measurements, due to obvious physical limitations. How does that compare to typical manufacturer's measurement methods and specifications for subs? It is clearly a restatement of the obvious that whole space versus half space versus quarter space versus corner loading would have a big effect on frequency response measurements for a sub. Is there any industry-standard for how manufacturers approach this, and what is your feeling for how it affects your ability to correlate your measurements with manufacturers specs and measurements?

Thanks again, appreciate your work and feedback.
11-03-12 05:25 PM
Erin H
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

I take back what I said about doing a spatial average for the subwoofer subjective analysis. If you're only concerned about the low end response, there's no reason to do a spatial average here... not unless the listening room is haunted by ghosts. the response is not going to vary here within a few inch window. If you're measuring multiple seats, it's a different story.

anyway, one simple FR capture with a LONG window (enough to allow fine resolution of resonance/modes) and a good CSD (waterfall) should help with your subjective to objective correlation if you choose to go this route. Personally, I'd say do the subjective, post the data of the driver in the 'ideal' situation as your baseline and then post the listening position response.
11-03-12 05:08 PM
Erin H
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

no worries. shoot me a PM and let me know when is best to call you and when/if I get a chance tonight I'll give you a shout.
11-03-12 05:07 PM
Dale Rasco
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Quote:
Erin H wrote: View Post
Dale,
I really do implore you to consider what I wrote above regarding the fundamental purpose of compression testing. Raising the output by 5dB doesn't really tell us anything about compression other than how the curve changes. That's fine... but that's only one (small) part of compression. We need a way to gauge input voltage for each step vs output SPL. You can do this pretty easily with online calculators. Just figure what each voltage input will be, in steps, and that should tell you what your output should be. Make a table with 6-7 stepped voltages, then the theoretical (what you should get, if compression were not inherent in design), and the real result. Then you'll see how much output in SPL is lost due to inefficiency at your reference frequcney of 50hz and you can still provide your FR curves so we can see how the overall curve is affected. It's not quite as pretty as the examples I gave above, but it'll suffice. Once I get set up, I will be providing the compression testing the same way as I did above. Flying in the face of apparent standard REW convention. lol.


Playing devil's advocate: As far as subjective vs objective, I actually agree. I'm more of a 'let the data talk' kind of guy. I stay away from subjective thoughts regarding sound; I freely talk subjectively on my likes/dislikes with a product interface, usability, etc. I do agree that when a subjective review is given, objective data should be provided to help the both the reviewer and the viewers (possibly) understand why your subjective analysis came out the way it did. Subwoofers are especially prone to placement and as we know placement will dictate response at the seated position. A simple 6 point spatial average of frequency response would suffice in objective/subjective correlation.


Just my $.02....

- Erin
Thank you Erin and I would like to discuss this in more detail when you have time for me to call. I understand all about letting the data talk however; there are other elements outside of hard numbers that need to be told as well. I do plan to do in room measurements, moving forward but am not yet committed to a methodology around it.

Thanks for the input, I sincerely appreciate it.
11-03-12 04:51 PM
Erin H
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Dale,
I really do implore you to consider what I wrote above regarding the fundamental purpose of compression testing. Raising the output by 5dB doesn't really tell us anything about compression other than how the curve changes. That's fine... but that's only one (small) part of compression. We need a way to gauge input voltage for each step vs output SPL. You can do this pretty easily with online calculators. Just figure what each voltage input will be, in steps, and that should tell you what your output should be. Make a table with 6-7 stepped voltages, then the theoretical (what you should get, if compression were not inherent in design), and the real result. Then you'll see how much output in SPL is lost due to inefficiency at your reference frequcney of 50hz and you can still provide your FR curves so we can see how the overall curve is affected. It's not quite as pretty as the examples I gave above, but it'll suffice. Once I get set up, I will be providing the compression testing the same way as I did above. Flying in the face of apparent standard REW convention. lol.


Playing devil's advocate: As far as subjective vs objective, I actually agree. I'm more of a 'let the data talk' kind of guy. I stay away from subjective thoughts regarding sound; I freely talk subjectively on my likes/dislikes with a product interface, usability, etc. I do agree that when a subjective review is given, objective data should be provided to help the both the reviewer and the viewers (possibly) understand why your subjective analysis came out the way it did. Subwoofers are especially prone to placement and as we know placement will dictate response at the seated position. A simple 6 point spatial average of frequency response would suffice in objective/subjective correlation.


Just my $.02....

- Erin
11-03-12 01:46 PM
Dale Rasco
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Quote:
ironglen wrote: View Post
I guess no spl capability will be tested since that would be a very long power run; even at low current it will require a decent gauge cord.

Cool idea
Hey Glen, sorry I missed this one. I have been working out the SPL thing. I actually think it will be possible but probably will not be added until next Spring.
11-03-12 01:41 PM
Dale Rasco
Re: About The Sub Zone: Testing Methodology and Environment

Quote:
acoustat6 wrote: View Post
Hi Dale, I will give you that what you are measuring, the reason why and your methodology is different form mine. As this is your forum, so be it.

Though, I have no idea why you would bother measuring speakers like this, but thats OK, I am a little behind the obvious learning curve. Does it not matter most what the speaker is doing in your room, rather than out in your driveway? But that is your methodology, and I will respect it.

But when you measure your system as you listen to it in your room, and give SUBJECTIVE reports to how it sounds then I am sure you will go by the standard REW specifications.

You have not answered my question as to which SPL meter you use, .... so please do.

Dale said, "Uhm.. What? I did state the target. 'From 0 Hz to 200 Hz starting at 90db and raising it 5db until the signal compressed. Please let me know what part of this is unclear to you.

Uhm....Yes that is correct, you have to state a target level as you are the one measuring. Otherwise I can infer any level I want to on your graph if you don't state what is the actual level. So you say that in all of your graphs, the first measurement is 90db going up in 5db increments, is that correct? Then looking at the following graphs:
the Axiom your initial reading of 90db is 4db too high.
the Chase is so wrong I dont know what to say
the Emotiva is 5db to high
the power soud is about correct is about correct but we need to see it overall freq response since it is clearly not a "subwoofer"
the svs graph clearly shows that you did not correlate 90db with you intended target.

Dale said, "One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. You cannot correlate a subjective opinion to a sine sweep. The best you could hope for is to correlate it to a given part of a song or film that I happen to capture that I also commented on. Subjective, emotional responses to audio are not measurable."

I say, really? Then why are you measuring? If measured freq response has no correlation with what you are hearing, why bother measuring?


Bob
"Make more progress, less excuses"
I keep forgetting the SPL, it is a Galaxy CM140. For measuring I am using the IBF.

Quote:
acoustat6 wrote: View Post
the first measurement is 90db going up in 5db increments, is that correct?
No, what I stated was that the volume is level set at to 90db AT 50Hz and then I will begin the sweeps and raise the volume by 5db.

Quote:
acoustat6 wrote: View Post
the Chase is so wrong I dont know what to say
If you would actually read the words instead of just looking at the pictures you would have seen at the top of the Chase test that I stated:
"Before we start I would like to say that the tests that I did back in February on the Chase VS-18.1 were performed before any methodology was written for The Sub Zone and as a result the measurements for max output were based on maintaining <10% THD. This is different than other tests that have been performed on this beast utilizing the CEA 2010 standard."
Quote:
acoustat6 wrote: View Post
I say, really? Then why are you measuring?
To show an estimated room gain benefit.

Bob, I am done trying to help you grasp this as it seems you only really want someone to argue with.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome