Home Theater Forum and Systems - HomeTheaterShack.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: Trouble for the 21" curved box build Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now




PLEASE COMPLETE ALL REQUIRED FIELDS BELOW... THANKS!

REQUIRED FIELDS ON THIS PAGE
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL OF THESE

Username
Password
Confirm Password
Email Address
Confirm Email Address
Random Question
Random Question #2




User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
PLEASE READ BELOW PRIOR TO ENTERING AN EMAIL ADDRESS!

ATTENTION!

YOU MUST ACTIVATE YOUR ACCOUNT!

Activation requires you reply to an email we will send you after you register... if you do not reply to this email, you will not be able to view certain areas of the forum or certain images... nor will you be able download software.

AN INVALID EMAIL ADDRESS WILL CAUSE YOUR ACCOUNT TO BE DELETED!

See our banned email list here: Banned Email List

We DO NOT respond to spamcop, boxtrapper and spamblocker emails... please add @hometheatershack DOT com to your whitelist prior to registering or you will get nowhere on your registration.


Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
11-19-14 06:21 PM
Erasmus
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

Quote:
chrapladm wrote: View Post
I have chatted with Nick for a long time and while I like his design ideas I dont really care much for his final product.(Incriminator Audio) I have their T/S parameters but most of them are generic numbers and not actual numbers. I would much prefer a product from Jacob at sundown or Nick from SI or Mark from IST/Mach 5 or Nick from Fi. Those guys all appear to be making very high quality products that I would love to own myself.
Agree on all counts. The numbers I found for the IA subs were for the car audio variants, but none for the home theater types I've heard about. Impossible to judge without those T/S. My suggesting that option was to counter for the fact that I am positively biased towards the others' works and wanted to be fair.

Quote:
chrapladm wrote: View Post
XBL2 verse other designs will have varying opinions.
Opinions are nice. Measurements in a comparative graph are pretty nice, too.



Got to love a good underhung design, but XBLČ is one of those elegant designs that makes so much sense it leaves you wondering why it wasn't done before. Wiggins and Dr. Hyre were inspired on that one. Overhung let's us enjoy a lot of output for the motor and can sound really good when kept within its limits, but...yeah.


Quote:
corock wrote: View Post
I've taken the damaged driver to a local repair shop to lift the spider and assess the situation. I'll have to wait for them to do that and then go from there.
Good luck! Here's to hoping you get that magnificent beast singing again.
11-15-14 10:51 PM
corock I've taken the damaged driver to a local repair shop to lift the spider and assess the situation. I'll have to wait for them to do that and then go from there.
11-15-14 07:31 PM
chrapladm
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

Only for music....wow. Pipe organ music I will have sealed pro audio 18's for my subs and while not the best for HT they will do GREAT at music.

And as you have stated only being used for music I would have to agree that the Mal 21" would probably yield you better results for your wants. BUT there is not a lot you can do for now.
11-14-14 11:08 PM
corock
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

This sub's only purpose is for music, so that is a huge factor for me.

I never did do a baffle for the enclosure after that guy ripped me off on the carbon fiber one I designed. Since I completed the sub 4 years ago, I have built a dedicated home theater and renovated almost my entire house, so I've haven't had time to consider working on the baffle again.
11-13-14 09:57 PM
chrapladm
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

I have chatted with Nick for a long time and while I like his design ideas I dont really care much for his final product.(Incriminator Audio) I have their T/S parameters but most of them are generic numbers and not actual numbers. I would much prefer a product from Jacob at sundown or Nick from SI or Mark from IST/Mach 5 or Nick from Fi. Those guys all appear to be making very high quality products that I would love to own myself.

XBL2 verse other designs will have varying opinions. I wont say you will like this or that one because we are all different. I just hope if you get a FTW that you maybe take a stab at finding out yourself what exactly is wrong with your Mal 21". Right when this one was given away I was looking at buying some 18's and a pair of 21's. Then everything went down hill on the product side and I never was able to own any.

So hopefully in the long haul the Mal 21 can live again. And secondly did you ever get the carbon fiber baffle or no? I couldnt remember what ever happened though that whole fiasco.
11-13-14 08:25 PM
Erasmus
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

Quote:
cellarnoise wrote: View Post
I have never read how a mal-x has better sound quality than a ftw- 21. Any links?
Quote:
corock wrote: View Post
The comment about it not having as good as sound quality made me wonder though, so I would be interested in more info if someone has it.
The Maelstrom-X 21" and FTW-21 use the same basket and soft parts (outside of the spiders). The differences come in the motor and therein lay big differences. The Maelstrom-X is a XBLČ motor, which is right up there with a good underhung design or TC Sounds' Linear Motor System. (I've done direct comparisons: playing side by side, an Exodus Audio Maelstrom-X 18" does a very nice job going up against a LMS-U to these reformed audiophile ears.) The FTW-21 is an overhung, high inductance design. (No Le is given, but the UXL-18 is said to have a Le of 5.23. The FTW-21 should be similar.) The inductance will hinder music playback quality. Someone who is amp limited/bound by a large, open listening space (or approaches home theater as a dB drag situation) will prefer the FTW-21 for the sensitivity and output. One who is more inclined to also play music on their system will prefer the XBLČ based driver or equivalent.

Quote:
chrapladm wrote: View Post
I have not heard of anyone complaining about the SQ of the FTW. Not sure where that info came from.
I'm not sure either.
Quote:
Erasmus wrote: View Post
If that proves to not be the case, you could opt for a Mach5 FTW-21, which would be a drop in replacement. The driver seems to be well-received...and will give you more boom for the watts though at a loss of sound quality compared to what you've been used to with the Maelstrom-X..
Quote:
chrapladm wrote: View Post
I do believe the Mal 21" was more sensitive down low but thats about it. They are very similar and should have similar sound characteristics.
XBLČ drivers don't sound like overhung. If corock has also used his system for music enjoyment for these past four years, switching to, say, the FTW-21 may/will be noticeable, depending. I've enjoyed subs built around XBLČ drivers in my system for over a decade now and have been doing a lot of critical comparative listening this year that includes a TC Sounds LMS-U 5400 as a reference. Going back and forth to a conventional driver (unless an exceptional, low inductance design) is a noticeable change and a hard one to accept for music. Movies? Not so much. In some ways, the extra distortion helps amp up the fun of the rumbles there, but it sounds bad with most music.

Quote:
cellarnoise wrote: View Post
The si 24 will be very constrained in 7cf. It likes 12+ in sealed as I understand it. A ftw-21 would work better.
The HS-24 likes room to breathe, but it performs notably better in smaller cabinets (real world measurements) than the models suggest. The driver would also see more than 7ftł once stuffed to ~1lbs/ftł.

Quote:
corock wrote: View Post
The 24 wouldn't fit in this cabinet, even if the cubic feet was appropriate. The diameter of that driver is bigger than the enclosure itself.
That's unfortunate, but better to not cut that beautiful cabinet up then. So, your only options for a drop in replacement are those that use the same baskets, scarce as they are. That limits you to essentially only another Maelstrom-X (which are being priced higher used than new) or the FTW-21. (Your F3 will move up about 10Hz with the FTW-21, but you'll get more output overall. EQ wisely and you're good.) Incriminator Audio is said to be willing (or had been in the past) to do custom 21" Death Penalty drivers for home theater purposes, but I'm wary enough of any outfit that leaves out some T/S parameters. One that leaves them all out? Yeah, I'd do some talking with them first and get some hard numbers before deciding if that would even be an option.
11-13-14 06:22 PM
corock
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

Quote:
chrapladm wrote: View Post
I have not heard of anyone complaining about the SQ of the FTW. Not sure where that info came from. BUT I am sure there is someone out there that doesnt like it. That being said having an amp that is fully capable of delivering enough power is crucial. While you can feed it 800watts and be happy I was not. Even with EQ they sounded great but I needed more power.

I am not saying you have o have a LOT more power, its just what worked for me. I had about 1100watts going to mine and when I finally upgrade to a much bigger I liked the change. Enough so that I didnt want to go back to a smaller amount again. I had about 4000watts going to each of them.

So capable amp and levels adjusted I would say its pretty hard to beat the 21" in any other 21" size. I do believe the Mal 21" was more sensitive down low but thats about it. They are very similar and should have similar sound characteristics.

I've been using an ep4000, but I see Behringer has the iNUKE series now. I'll have to do some research on those; it sounds like they have more power.
11-13-14 04:44 PM
chrapladm
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

I have not heard of anyone complaining about the SQ of the FTW. Not sure where that info came from. BUT I am sure there is someone out there that doesnt like it. That being said having an amp that is fully capable of delivering enough power is crucial. While you can feed it 800watts and be happy I was not. Even with EQ they sounded great but I needed more power.

I am not saying you have o have a LOT more power, its just what worked for me. I had about 1100watts going to mine and when I finally upgrade to a much bigger I liked the change. Enough so that I didnt want to go back to a smaller amount again. I had about 4000watts going to each of them.

So capable amp and levels adjusted I would say its pretty hard to beat the 21" in any other 21" size. I do believe the Mal 21" was more sensitive down low but thats about it. They are very similar and should have similar sound characteristics.
11-13-14 10:22 AM
Pav26
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

Wow, I remember seeing the thread for this build and it was beautiful. Sorry to see it like this man, I can vouch for for Erasmus' assessment of the situation - it does indeed sound like a shorting ring has come loose from within the motor.

Are you able to get the dust cap off at all gently without ripping the cone material? If so, you could see if the shorting ring is one around the pole piece, and just pull it out, or try and re glue it. Pulling it out would mean you'd increase the inductance slightly, and distortion (again, slightly). However, that IMO is better than rattle.
11-13-14 09:19 AM
dougc
Re: Trouble for the 21" curved box build

I will echo the FTW21 as a replacement. I have heard only good things about it, but there are not too many out there. I will most likely use the UXL18 for my next build if I can't source more LMS-Ultras, so I feel pretty good about the company's products.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML is not allowed!

 


For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome