Joined
·
361 Posts
I would guess a "full wave" TL/horn/what have you would be out of phase and cancel out? So is there a such thing?
Every TL and horn is a 1/2 wave device, one octave up from the 1/4 wavelength frequency. Just like with a reflex cab port output from the TL terminus is way down an octave above Fp, and if the pipe is properly stuffed is inconsequential. With a rear loaded horn a 1/2 octave dip is intrinsic, and is the major flaw of the design in a fullranger. A well designed rear loader sub places the dip above the passband where it can't pose a problem.I would guess a "full wave" TL/horn/what have you would be out of phase and cancel out? So is there a such thing?
Thank you Bill, i've been impatiently waiting for an answer to that...it's going to take me a bit to obsorb a lot of that info.Every TL and horn is a 1/2 wave device, one octave up from the 1/4 wavelength frequency. Just like with a reflex cab port output from the TL terminus is way down an octave above Fp, and if the pipe is properly stuffed is inconsequential. With a rear loaded horn a 1/2 octave dip is intrinsic, and is the major flaw of the design in a fullranger. A well designed rear loader sub places the dip above the passband where it can't pose a problem.
The other way around.So let's start with a 10Hz device, as my other thread implies that as a good fantasy. 1 octave up being 20Hz. So 1/2 wave is 10Hz, and 1/4 is 20, and 8th would be 40??
Thanks!
Not necessarily. Well designed TLs and horns are ripple free, though ripple free horns tend to be very large. But with the EQs now available ripple is no more a concern than a room mode, so reasonably sized horns are quite practical.So at 1/2, 1/4, 18th, 16th... I assume there are peaks and dips, ripples, and such
Horns are considerably less expensive than direct radiators, as they get far better results per driver. My 8 cubic foot HT sub is loaded with a $35 eight incher, and goes as low and loud as SHMBO will tolerate. Commercial horns are expensive due to their high labor costs to build. That's not a factor in the DIY realm.I know everything is a matter of opinion, but it seems to me if $$$ were unlimited, as well as space and such, these would be the way to go.
Oops, SWMBO.Shmbo?
That you're apparently a bachelor.:yay:Now that we got the spelling correct, what does it mean? :bigsmile:
Horns are considerably less expensive than direct radiators, as they get far better results per driver. My 8 cubic foot HT sub is loaded with a $35 eight incher, and goes as low and loud as SHMBO will tolerate. Commercial horns are expensive due to their high labor costs to build. That's not a factor in the DIY realm.
she wears my b____ no, not it...Oops, SWMBO.
I've been married 28 years. A Google search turned up "She Who Must Be Obeyed". Apparently I don't have that problem. :whistling:That you're apparently a bachelor.:yay:
On my website.pics/vids/links??
Have submitted your name to Ripley's 'Believe It or Not' !I've been married 28 years. A Google search turned up "She Who Must Be Obeyed". Apparently I don't have that problem.
It all makes sense, but much of it is incorrect. The problem with wikipedia is that anyone can post anything, and accuracy is not guaranteed. The definitive work on TLs was done in the late 1990s by George Augsperger, his results were published in the JAES and AudioXpress Magazine. As to who he is, should you ever submit a treatise on loudspeakers to the JAES chances are it will be George who passes judgment on it.It all makes sense, the only new news to me is that it is saying for upper range it acts as an IB of sorts, until the 1/2 wave is reached, then it reinforces... which is really the whole idea, right?