Home Theater Forum and Systems banner

86% of Windows 7 PCs Maxing Out Memory

2854 Views 25 Replies 13 Participants Last post by  cburbs
Slashdot post:

86% of Windows 7 PCs Maxing Out Memory

I don't have Windows 7 as an OS, but I have been wondering why my relatively new computer (specs below) with MS Vista 64 uses so much memory.

Computer (desktop, home)
- From: Cyberpower
- CPU: Intel Core i7 920 @ 2.67 GHz
- MOB: ASUS X58 P6T SLI
- Audio: Audiotrak - Prodigy HD2
--- Output #1) to Dell LCD computer speaker bar
--- Output # 2) to RCA outs to Russound house system
- Video: ATI Radeon HD 4870
- Monitor: Dell 2408WFP - 24" LCD
- Memory: 6 GB DDR3 PC13333
- OS: Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit - SP1
- Media Player: WinAmp 5.56


With a few to several windows open it can quickly get up to 85% memory usage.
I've wondered if I should get more memory?

Thoughts?

Mike
See less See more
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
You definitely don't need any more memory. What are the memory eating processes that are running?
You definitely don't need any more memory. What are the memory eating processes that are running?
Usually a bunch of IE windos (eg Gmail, TCA, AVS, etc) and WinAmp.

Mike
I take it you didn't read any of the discussion over at Slashdot? It's a feature, not a bug. The memory is being used for Hard Disk caching and is released if it's needed. It's not really in "use", nor does it lead to swap usage. Linux does the same thing, except it still considers the memory "free". The morons who wrote the original article at Computerworld should have their PC's confiscated for writing such a misleading piece of **** article.
What are the memory eating processes that are running?
It's likely that no process is eating his memory. This is because the article was written by people who have a fundamental misunderstanding of what Windows 7 does and would rather write a sensationalized article than do a little research.
It's true. The feature is called superfetch. Instead of wasting all free memory resources like XP did, Vista and 7 preload as many applications as possible in the background to make the system feel more responsive. After Vista SP1 it waits a little while after booting up to start so as to reduce hard drive thrashing and unresponsiveness right at first. If a system process needs the memory it can be freed up instantly.

It astounds me that experienced industry journalists failed to understand this as far back as the original Vista launch.
If I had 6Meg I'd be more concerned if Windows wasn't using it.:saywhat:
If I had 6Meg I'd be more concerned if Windows wasn't using it.:saywhat:
If you had 6MB RAM you'd have a hard time running Windows 7...:fryingpan:
FWIW, the guy who wrote the article got canned from the site that published it. It turns out he was someone else writing under a pen name, and had some conflict of interest amongst being totally misinformed. link
Yeah, the whole thing is very interesting and goes to show how fake a lot of these types of sites are.
If you had 6MB RAM you'd have a hard time running Windows 7...:fryingpan:
Walked into that one didn't I? :embarass:

Hard to believe my first computer had like 3.5K. :eek2:

See less See more
The TRS-80, my first computer.
Yes, that is a tape (cassette) drive.:D
http://oldcomputers.net/trs80i.html
Timex Sinclair 1000

I remember my dad borrowing a Timex-Sinclair from a co-worker for an extended period of time.



The upgrade to a tape storage system was big news.
Membrane keyboard -- nice!

Mike
See less See more
Mike the Timex/Sinclair ZX-81 was my first desktop computer. I bought one and took it to work. Did a few programs on it that were easier to do than on the mainframe computer at the time. I had the tape drive as well to backup the programs. The 16KB expansion RAM pack was cool, but I built one myself.

The funny thing is that I am playing with microcontrollers today for fun and remind me alot of that computer! :huge:
IBM Portable model 68

Our first home computer was the IBM "portable" (also known as luggable).



I believe it had a 9" amber CRT screen.

I think my parents still have it.
We added joysticks (needed some mod to connect) and (I think) 640K of RAM which was a crazy amount at the time...

Mike

PS - Found some info on it...
Link

Model: model 68
Introduced: February 1984
Price: US $4225.
Weight: 30 pounds
CPU:Intel 8088 @ 4.77MHz
RAM: 256K, 640K max
Display: 9-inch amber display CGA graphics, 80 X 25 text
Storage: Two 360KB 5.25-inch disk drives
Ports:1 parallel, 1 serial, CGA video
OS: IBM PC-DOS Version 2.10 (disk)
See less See more
Our first home computer was the IBM "portable" (also known as luggable).



I believe it had a 9" amber CRT screen.

I think my parents still have it.
We added joysticks (needed some mod to connect) and (I think) 640K of RAM which was a crazy amount at the time...

Mike
My dad not only got the 640K upgrade for that beast. He also replaced one of the floppies with a 10MB hard disk. I brought it to high school for independent study because it ran laps around the Apple IIs.
My dad not only got the 640K upgrade for that beast. He also replaced one of the floppies with a 10MB hard disk. I brought it to high school for independent study because it ran laps around the Apple IIs.
That sounds vaguely familiar.
We may have done the same thing.
10MB sounded crazy big at the time.

Mike
Amateures. I had a TRS80 and I liked it. I STILL have my TRS80 with cassette tape drive :) Programming thousands of lines of basic just to play space invaders really, really slowly rocked.
Usually a bunch of IE windos (eg Gmail, TCA, AVS, etc) and WinAmp.

Mike
You still use IE and you wonder why your computer seems slower??!
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top