Home Theater Forum and Systems banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
9,347 Posts

is it worth a higher cost.
It appears to have more features, so that would make it worth the higher cost - if you need them. Also, it looks fairly nice, while the FBQ is downright ugly. That might be worth something, if you feel the same way. It might also be a better choice for full-range use (you didn't say what you were going to do with it).

Regards,
Wayne
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
274 Posts
One thing I noticed in the 220i literature is that it lists the frequency response as 20hz -20khz. The FBQ2496 lists it's frequency response as <10hz - 44khz.

While it seems both units can only set filters down to 20 hz, being able to pass a signal through that is less than 20hz is pretty important for subwoofer use. :nerd:


Tim
:drive:
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top