Joined
·
272 Posts
I am starting a new ported build in 4 to 7 cu feet Ftune 20Hz and i narrowed my choice to these 3 drivers:
Mach5 IXL15.2.2 the SoundSplinter RL-p15 and the TC Sounds LMS-R 15 :sn:, the latter two share the same price, where RL-p15 has more impressive, juicier motor
So i did some simulation,
The Mach 15.2.2 does nice job in 4 cu feet tuned to 18Hz , TC Sounds reaches the same low freqs but in 7 cu feet with 3dB higher output.
What is with RL-p15 happening is that WinISD suggests unrealistic volumes around 1/3 cu feet and with some iterrative process i came to 3.5 cu feet and Fs at 25Hz, the realistic Ftune would be 70-80Hz..
. The output drops sihnificantly below 80Hz :dontknow: it is no go at all... Does anyone of you guys know what is going on with RL-p15 is such quality driver?
One thing when i compare the T-Small parameters from WinISD database the driver has the lowest Qts 0.18 of all three drivers but i know a lot of you guys here did great jobs with RL-p15 ported subs:help:
Mach5 IXL15.2.2 the SoundSplinter RL-p15 and the TC Sounds LMS-R 15 :sn:, the latter two share the same price, where RL-p15 has more impressive, juicier motor
So i did some simulation,
The Mach 15.2.2 does nice job in 4 cu feet tuned to 18Hz , TC Sounds reaches the same low freqs but in 7 cu feet with 3dB higher output.
What is with RL-p15 happening is that WinISD suggests unrealistic volumes around 1/3 cu feet and with some iterrative process i came to 3.5 cu feet and Fs at 25Hz, the realistic Ftune would be 70-80Hz..
One thing when i compare the T-Small parameters from WinISD database the driver has the lowest Qts 0.18 of all three drivers but i know a lot of you guys here did great jobs with RL-p15 ported subs:help:
Attachments
-
199.3 KB Views: 1,218