Home Theater Forum and Systems banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
22,577 Posts
[img]http://www.hometheaterreview.com/images/rel-b2-subwoofer.jpg[/img]
REL Acoustics Britannia B2 Subwoofer Review

By: Ken Kessler

To shun subwoofers because of some imagined association with the Dark Side is to ignore a noble history, and with British and Continental rather than just American precedents. Indeed, while M&K and other pioneers in the States were developing bass augmentation systems for domestic and pro use, UK legend Jim Rogers offered an active sub for his delicious JR149s. So, to set the tone, guys, subwoofers are politically correct in two-channel terms. The audiophile problem has always been one of integration.

This is why REL carved a niche as a subwoofer-only specialist, before the calling came to exploit multi-channel. REL's designs are the rare exception, universal subwoofers in the truest sense. From the outset, REL's subs have offered the most thorough arsenal of settings for integrating their products with the widest range of main speakers, including dipoles, electrostatics and others that exhibit an almost wilful refusal to accept external bass support. Without apology, they are complicated enough to warrant a 32-page instruction manual, the net result being that your labors will produce a sub/main speaker blend with a seam that's impossible to detect.

Although the range is mature and virtually above reproach, the brand's biggest market - the USA - demanded something more. And before you start accusing Yanks of an unnatural love for deep bass, assuming that they only listen to Snoop Dogg at 140dB, chew on this for a while: Americans are blessed with larger rooms.

REL certainly doesn't dress up its subs, so I'll let the pictures tell the story rather than kvetch about something most people will hide anyway. Build quality is rock solid, and - despite dimensions of 343 x 610 x 410mm (WHD) - the B2 is a sod to move around: the massive 10-inch woofer, audiophile-grade electronics and solid construction contribute to a 38kg total.

REL isn't prissy about positioning: the manual offers a number of degrees of -retentiveness, with chapters entitled "REL Set-Up Made Simple" and "REL Set-Up Made Simple." Because you'll be eager to have it up and running, these are the instructions you'll use at first. You can dig into the meatier parts after the unit is run in, and you feel comfortable with the changes it makes to your system. It's like beginning with the "quick start guide" with a new mobile phone or computer before deciphering the bits about setting up LANs.

Upon braving the set-up possibilities, you'll find more tweaking fun than anything this side of a linear-tracking tonearm. REL's B-Series subs provide 24 crossover frequencies from 22-96Hz, using precision-trimmed circuits, high level and low level inputs through a variety of connectors, fine and coarse roll-off - they left no variable untouched. And this subwoofer can be optimized for either two-channel or '.1' roles.

Where the REL really shows its stuff is in the way it handles what can only be described as "sub bass." However deep you think your system goes, this extracts that little bit more. As REL's John Hunter put it, the topology "approximates a transmission line. The merits of REL's approach to true sub bass has been catalogued by many, so I'll simplify it down to a profound ability to accurately, tunefully play the very lowest registers - the sort of thing where the walls begin to distort and the floor ripples with true infra bass - the area in which this occurs is the sub-35hz range."

Hunter continues, "In the B-Series, a forward-firing driver affects the improved slam and attack, as well as carriage, we were looking for but features a complex rectangular-to-round inner chambering [like a poor man's ARM loading] that ultimately vents to a down-firing port. The result is the synthesis of many previous REL ideas into, we believe, a better whole. We have delivered about 96 percent of Stentor-like low bass with better upper and middle bass registers, at about 30 percent less money."

To ensure that I was hearing what the B2 could do, REL set up the sub to augment my Sonus faber Guarneris, which was logical, as the US distributor for REL also handles Sonus faber. In under an hour, the B2 was matched to the Guarneri, crossing over at a low 22Hz - a benefit of having a rock-solid listening room which obviated the need to cross over any higher. With McIntosh valve electronics, Marantz CD12 and an SME analogue front-end, I sat back, eager to learn about the area of sound that matters least to me: deep, deep bass.

Now I am not one of those who find the bass of the original Guarneri even remotely light, but it was clear that the addition of a perfectly optimized, robust subwoofer added weight that I didn't know I was missing. It was subtle, though, rather than a case of getting whacked over the head with Thor's hammer. As much as I used it to exploit blockbuster woofer breakers, from ZZ Top to Funkadelic, it was far more impressive to hear what the sub did with acoustic bass on Alison Krauss recordings, kick drums, and, yes, a dose of Kodo.

While I'm sure a knob twiddler could turn the B2 into a weapon of musical destruction, REL set this up in my room for sonic purity. And I never, NEVER felt the B2 was an intrusion. It diminished nothing in the main speakers, while adding precisely the lift REL hoped I would hear.

If you, like so many, can only house smallish speakers but also have a gap within which a sub could nestle, you must try the B2. But be nice when you visit the retailer. Very nice. And then maybe he'll set it up for you. That 32-page owner's manual is annoying.

An Anglo-American Subwoofer
According to John Hunter of Sumiko, REL's parent company, The Britannia Series is, despite its name, "a response to the American market's desire to push REL's performance platform ever higher. I specify 'American market,' because one of the useful functions Sumiko performs for all its partners is to listen very carefully to the market and then pass along our recommendations. We pushed for a somewhat different, higher-performance package, while the rest of the world was sold the current ST range, which emphasizes compactness and remote control over pure performance."

Hunter also stressed that, above all, the RELs were designed for two-channel systems as much as anything else.

The Verdict
While one can understand a natural preference among enthusiasts for subs made by the same maker as the main speakers, i.e., B&W with B&W, REL has proven over the years that universal subs can work. The B2 was able to mate seamlessly with speakers as diverse as LS3/5As, Guarneris and MartinLogans. If that isn't a rave recommendation, then I'm Gordon Brown.

Source: HomeTheaterReview.com
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7 Posts
Sonny- Please direct this if this is not the right forum. I currently have B&W N502 speakers fired by a Rotel RSX 1065 amplifier.

Although I like the N502 for all but low's it definitly is lacking here. So I have been looking at either selling what I have and upgrading (second option) or first option buying an audio sub.
The Subs I have been looking at are
REL Brittnia 2- $1,110 EBAY
REL Strat III- $800 (New)- Ebay
REL StormII - Used & older model- $875
Revel Concerta B12
My frugal father (A VERY old former NBC television engineer) recommends
Martin Logan DYNBLD 10" due to firing flexibility and a "good deal"- $324 includins shipping- Amazon
Marin Logan 12" Abys- $600

My range would be less than $400-$1100. I typically try to find the best used deal to try to find the best unit for the money unless the newer subs are worth getting into. I would considered the newest REL's if you or any member have a recommendation.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Russ

I listen for music from classical, jazz, 70/80/90's rock and a little country. My room is about 24X30, has wood floors, large sliding glass doors.
 

·
Elite Shackster
Joined
·
7,142 Posts
An interesting review. I have to say Ive always been a huge fan of Rel subs. The sound quality from all Ive heard has been very nice. Sure most other subs will go do the depth thing better, but for those not obsessed with that and dont mind paying the premium, you cant go wrong with a Rel IMO.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
39 Posts
Never cared for Rel subs, probably never will,and frankly I don't see how this sub is an "answer" to anything let alone for an "American demand", or market needs.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top