I just received my Rockets and have been listening to them for a few hours. Right now, I have a single pair of RS850's connected since I am waiting on my new entertainment center to hold Bigfoot. But I thought I would share my initial impressions and a comparison to my other speakers, the Mackie HR824mk2 monitors. I have the Onkyo PR-SC885 Pre/Pro + Emotiva XPA-5 driving them. They are placed about 6-1/2 feet apart in a roughly 15' x 18' room with a 9' ceiling and which is open to the kitchen and dining area. Please keep in mind that these are initial impressions since they are not yet broken in and I've only been listening to music so far.
The single biggest difference between these two speakers is the midrange. Compared to the Mackies, the Rocket's midrange is:
1) more articulate - more definition in voices and instruments
2) better dispersion - leading to a noticeably larger soundstage on most music
3) smoother - they can be played significantly louder (about 10 dB by my ears) without listener fatigue
Another thing that I noticed is that the mid-bass on the Rockets is indeed what it is talked up to be - very quick and impactful when the music calls for it. The Mackies' mid-bass is less present and not quite as quick. Even though the soundstage is bigger with the Rockets, it seemed that the Mackies have a larger sweet spot (albeit not as sweet). The one thing I've always thought that Mackies excel at is the top octave or two, and here I give the advantage to them. I think there is a little more air to this frequency range in the Mackies. As far as dynamics are concerned, the Rockets win here by a good margin. The Mackies are actually a pretty dynamic speaker when crossed over above 60 Hz but that upper midrange rings when pushed beyond moderate levels, causing listener fatigue.
In closing, I'd say I'm overall quite happy with the Rockets. They are a very well balanced speaker, with no distinct weaknesses. Are they ultra-articulate with a huge expansive soundstage that makes you forget you are listening to speakers? No. But for the price I paid, it's hard to imagine a better speaker for my tastes. I'll have more to say after they've broken in more and the center and surrounds are hooked up.
The single biggest difference between these two speakers is the midrange. Compared to the Mackies, the Rocket's midrange is:
1) more articulate - more definition in voices and instruments
2) better dispersion - leading to a noticeably larger soundstage on most music
3) smoother - they can be played significantly louder (about 10 dB by my ears) without listener fatigue
Another thing that I noticed is that the mid-bass on the Rockets is indeed what it is talked up to be - very quick and impactful when the music calls for it. The Mackies' mid-bass is less present and not quite as quick. Even though the soundstage is bigger with the Rockets, it seemed that the Mackies have a larger sweet spot (albeit not as sweet). The one thing I've always thought that Mackies excel at is the top octave or two, and here I give the advantage to them. I think there is a little more air to this frequency range in the Mackies. As far as dynamics are concerned, the Rockets win here by a good margin. The Mackies are actually a pretty dynamic speaker when crossed over above 60 Hz but that upper midrange rings when pushed beyond moderate levels, causing listener fatigue.
In closing, I'd say I'm overall quite happy with the Rockets. They are a very well balanced speaker, with no distinct weaknesses. Are they ultra-articulate with a huge expansive soundstage that makes you forget you are listening to speakers? No. But for the price I paid, it's hard to imagine a better speaker for my tastes. I'll have more to say after they've broken in more and the center and surrounds are hooked up.