Home Theater Forum and Systems banner

41 - 60 of 110 Posts

·
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
·
606 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

I really wanted to hear the Dali Ikons on this trip, which they had. But I ran out of time, I had to get on the road to beat traffic and had I stayed it would have been a rushed listen. I may have to take a second trip to compare Dali with Totem:bigsmile:.
Oh yes, please do go back. I'm very interested to hear your opinion of how they compare.

And I second the suggestion to hear the Revel Concertas. They are devastatingly dynamic with good amplification.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #43
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Yeah, I really want to hear the Revel Concerta F-12's. They are proving to be the most elusive on my list. There a a couple of dealers not too far away but they are "appointment only," and custom install type places. Right now I am unable to keep an appointment that would require most of the day (drive, listen, drive) during business hours. The Dali's, I think, I can audition on Saturdays so they shouldn't be a problem. Just a wild guess, but do you like the Ikon series, Naut?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,060 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

I found that there is a marked difference between the Dali Ikon 7 and the 6. The 7 is definitely worth the $500 extra in price. One can find the 7s at online discounters for under $1500/pair. Of course I like the Vandersteen 2Ce Signature IIs better than either, but the Dali Ikons are very good sounding loudspeakers. Have fun listening to them.
 

·
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
·
606 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Just a wild guess, but do you like the Ikon series, Naut?
How'd you know? :scratchhead:

I haven't heard all of the speakers on your audition list, so I am curious about how some of the ones that aren't sold around here compare to what I fell in love with.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #46
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Round 5:

Okay, I finally got a chance to get out for another listen. I went back to the same place as last time to specifically hear the Dali Icon 6, and whatever else they had in my price range, and to give the Hawks a second listen... I should add that last time everything was driven by some higher end NAD electronics at 150wpc, this time lower end, solid state NAD in a different room and a true 50wpc, some of the same music as before and some new... (remember these are just MY impressions and opinions)

I will run 'em down in the order I listened to them.

Usher V-602 (msrp≈$1000)
Started with a little jazz from Grant Green, and noticed right away that the cymbals had a very nice decay, acoustic bass was nice and full, but drum rim shots were sounding a little on the thin side. Next I moved into some Fela Kuti afro-beat that is a really clean recording and has exceptional dynamics. The V-602's sounded really good here, nice separation of instruments, clear clean highs. A slight upper-mid push, that I noticed slightly with the Grant Green, became even more apparent with the introduction of brass horn instruments. Next I tried some Beatle's Abbey Road (one of my all time favorites). The electric bass had nice punch and clarity with these speakers, though they went fairly deep they sounded a bit bright to my ears. Next was a little Eryka Bahdu, and the V-602's handled it well with a full punchy bass, and high end clarity, sounding good both high and low volume. Overall, I would say that for the money this is a fine speaker, with a slight accent on the upper-mids.

Dali Icon 6(msrp≈$1600)
Starting where we left off with Eryka Bahdu the Dali's had a deeper bass response, crisp highs, and a nice well balanced sound. They have very nice imaging and excellent control. Rim shots were crisp, and very real sounding. Fela Kuti showed a very nice live sound, great separation, with almost crystalline highs. When the horns started playing they came across a little harsh. On to what has become the deal breaker for more than a few speakers I have auditioned, Fu Manchu. I should say that I only play the Fu Manchu on speakers that I actually like. The "California Crossing" CD is not a spectacular recording, but is dense with crunchy guitars, thick meaty bass, and hard driving drums, and became a staple early in my speaker quest when the B&W 683's failed to sound good to it. I am happy to report that the Dali's did well, though again I thought they sounded a bit bright. I am sure that is due to the ribbon tweeter. They actually made my ears tingle, like they were stimulating all the little hairs in my ears that I usually do not use for normal hearing. I was left feeling that the Dali's reach far above the audible sound spectrum, and your dog would probably be happy to finally hear all of the music. Talking with the salesman about this he recommended pairing any Dali speaker with a tube amp to mellow the highs a bit, I think that is probably a very good suggestion. I really like the Dali sound, but I am not sure they would be a great choice for my solid state electronics, and hardwood floors. I do think that those who own them and have gotten accustomed to their high-end will think that everything else is lackluster. Nice speakers.

Era D-10 & D-14(msrp≈$1700 & $2000)
Moving from the Dali's into anything with out a ribbon (or plasma) tweeter is bound to leave the new guy sounding a bit dull, and it did. I was relatively unimpressed with the D-10's (I had never even heard of ERA, but they had just gotten them in and wanted to hear how they compared to the other stuff I was listening to, so I was game). They had a smooth sound but seemed to be lacking deep bass, and a bit thin in the mids. The D-14's solved both of those problems nicely, with the inclusion of a mid-range driver in addition to the two woofers + tweeter arrangement of it's little brother. I thought that the tweeter sounded a bit restrained though. This could be because the speakers had just come out of the boxes and had very little if any play time on them (if you believe in break in), or because the Dali's had ruined my perception of clear highs forever :crying: )

Usher Be-718 "Tiny dancers"(msrp≈$2700)
okay, way out of my stated price range, but street price is close to street price of the Hawks, and i had read some glowing reviews about these babies... Started with Eryka Bahdu, and they provided some astoundingly rich and deep bass for their "bookshelf" size, they truly have more of a floor-stander sound. Put on Fela Kuti and WOW! awesome imaging, great clarity. The brass horns on this recording were outstanding, the beryllium tweeter presented them very crisp and natural, without the extremely sharp edge of the ribbons. They gave a very FULL-range sound. Next, I tried the Grant Green. His guitar came across with a very nice tone (one of the things I love about Grant Green), piano sounded like the invisible man was playing an invisible baby grand in front of me. Very smooth speaker. I played the Beatles and was not disappointed, the bass was tight, thick, and punchy. I am not sure if Paul uses the Hoffner (sp?) or Rickenbacker bass on Abbey Road but I have always been in love with it's sound especially on that album, that thick meaty Ka-chunk that he gets...:T A solid reproduction of that specific sound is what I am looking for in a speaker, and the Usher Be-718 has it, so too does the Hawk (I just realized that yesterday when listening to the Tiny Dancers). As you can probably tell, I was digging these speakers so I wanted to try something I hadn't listened to on anything else yet, Galactic. Another of my favorite bands, these guys are a Jam band from New Orleans and play their own blend of somewhat drum oriented Jazz/Funk/Rock/hip-hop/R&B. I used their live set, which is IMO very well recorded. The Ushers did well, again. Music sounded "live," tight drums and a solid bottom end. I keep coming back to things sounding like they should on the Be-718's, just very natural... I am hesitant to say "Neutral," because that is not what I got from them. I think "Natural" is more appropriate. Okay, so I had to play the Fu Manchu last, and they did well with it, very nice presentation, though they came off sounding just a touch bright with the Fu. Fantastic speaker.

Totem "Hawk"(msrp≈$2400)
I had to listen to these last as they were my current favorites, kind of to put them all into perspective. Started with Fu Manchu on the Hawks and the salesman thought they seemed to reach a bit lower than the Usher Be-718. That may be true, but what I noticed was that between the two speakers their midrange presentation was the most different (actually we thought the two speakers had a very similar sound, overall). The Hawks mids were slightly more laid back, the Be-718's more forward. My opinion was reinforced when we listened to Fela Kuti and the brass section came up, crisp and clear on the Hawks, though not as forward as on the Be-718. Listening to the Beatles on the Hawks made me miss the 150watts from my first listen. They sounded less punchy than I remembered, I am sure that is because of the electronics. The Hawks are a less efficient speaker than the Ushers, though both are power hungry. We had to turn the volume knob up to about 10:00 for both (most of the other listening was done around the 9:00 position).

So, I still have some more to hear on my list before I drop the cash, but as it stands now I have a hard choice between two excellent speakers, that both cost more than I wanted to spend :duh:
 

·
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
·
606 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Wow, great write-up!

Still not sure, eh? Is there anything left on your audition list?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #49
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Wow, great write-up!

Still not sure, eh? Is there anything left on your audition list?
Yeah, there's more. Ascend Sierra's, Thiel CS1.6, I also want to hear some Dali Helicon's, NHT classic fours, and Salk Song-Towers. I am having a very hard time finding somewhere to hear the Revel Concerta F-12's and anything from Quad...
I am a fairly patient man and want to find the "right" speakers for me. In my mind it is kind of like dating... and I dated a lot before I got married. :bigsmile:

I started another thread, basically condensed my posts from this one on a different forum (I hope it's okay to link to it... Speakerquest) and added pictures and stuff, in hopes of some more input from some new and different people. I will try to keep both of them going until I decide on something.

Another thing that seems to be happening is my price seems to be increasing to get the sound I am looking for... I should probably change the title of this thread to reflect that....
 

·
Friend of the Shack
Joined
·
1,356 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Ah, looks like I missed that post. Yeah, the Vandersteen look is not so popular with wives; moreso with cats...

Sounds like you've found some winners in your search. It's a lot of fun, that speaker shopping!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
228 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

While I haven't heard the new ERA D-10 and D-14, I'm surprised you didn't like them. Not that a designer makes them impervious to criticism, but Michael Kelly of Aerial Acoustics (and prior to that ADS) fame is the design engineer for those and the first 2 models which were small bookshelves got rave reviews. Of course, as I own Aerials (and absolutely love them!!!), I am as I said surprised. By the way, you do a good job of being quite concise in your reviews...keep on truckin'; you'll find something you absolutely love. I'm really surprised you're having so much trouble finding Revels. Oh, speaking fo the continuously rising pricing; when you get to the 3K level, you should be able to find a really nice used pair of Aerial Acoustics 10Ts (Audiogon)...which while in production (trust me they're still a very very very good speaker) were >8K a pair with Sound Anchors.
Good luck,
Konky.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,582 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Excellent write-up! Thank you for sharing your experiences. I love hearing about peoples auditions.

I almost hope you never find "The One" so we can can continue to get these great writeups.

JCD
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,582 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Well, I've got some others that I'd like to throw in to the mix if you're still out hunting..

Dynaudio has a handful of speakers in your ~2k range.
  • Other than the 82's, the entire Audience line is <$2k, including some of the floor standers that get down to 28Hz (Audience 72)
  • In the Focus line, all but the 220 is <$2k and is capable of reaching pretty low (the 140 gets down to 41Hz)
I've only personally listened so some in the Contour line, but those have been my favorites for a while. I'm assuming that the Audience and Focus lines should similarly be great -- and maybe you could find them on sale since some (I think) of the contours are being phased out -- I've heard that line is being updated.
If I was in the market, and could afford to splurge a little, I'd probably be hitting up the Contour S1.4's. At $3k/pair though, I'd have a LOT of groveling to do. Of course, if I happened to be flush with cash (yeah, right), I'd REALLY want the 3.4's or the 5.4's.

I wasn't sure where you lived, so I included all of the SoCal Dynaudio dealers (per Dyaudio's website) below. I'd really like to hear what you think.


JCD



Atlantic Stereo
445 E. 17th St.
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
(949) 646-8895

Sound Factor
2936 Wilshire Blvd.
Santa Monica, CA 90403
(310) 264-5457

Sound Factor
2 South Rosemead Blvd.
Pasadena, CA 91107
(626) 577-4945

Sound Factor
17265 Ventura
Encino, CA 91316
(818) 501-3548

Elite Custom AV
5505 Moreno St. Ste 104
Montclair, CA 91763
(909) 931-2835

Audio Architect
7480 La Jolla Blvd.
La Jolla, CA 92037
(858) 435-0331

LA Audio Video
101 S. Western Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90004
(213) 252-0066

MaxSecurity Systems, Inc.
8111 Orion Ave.
Van Nuys, CA 91406
(800) 540-4022

Sound World
9738 Westminster Ave. #103
Garden Grove, CA 92844
(714) 539-0523
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
168 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

So far:
Axioms are on my not-so-short list,
along with Paradigm Studio series,
B&W 683's & CM7's,
Def-Tech mythos,
Totem,
Onix rpcket RS850,
Revel F-12,
Monitor Audio Silver RS-6/8,
and the SVS MTS-01...

Now vandersteen joins that group.
Any arguments for or against, and/or further additions to that list are welcome.
If that was my list, the Revels would get the top honors.
Might also add VA.

Also along the lines of the Revels would be JBL's Performance Series, which would require their matching subs, or other suitable subs.
I have the PS PT800s with Revel subs. Actually, the Revel sub driver (Ultima sub15) was built by JBL Pro, the SUB1500. I have the main PT800s stacked on the SUB1500s. The overall sound of the PS system is superb, clean, detailed highs, solid mids and rock solid bass.
The matching subs are the PS1400.
The list for the PT800 is $1600/ea, but can be had for a lot less. The Harman online store has them for $1050/ea and $1119 for the subs. And at times can be had for even less, with a little seaching, online.
http://www.harmanaudio.com/search_browse/default.asp?sp=S&brand=JBL&market=HOM
http://ultimateavmag.com/speakersystems/31/ Gordon Holt's review.


 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #56
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Speakerquest (Round 6)


Yesterday turned out to be a Dynaudio kind of day. The first place I went, actually to hear the Thiel's, couldn't carry them because another dealer was too close. Other locations of the same name carried them, but not the one I went to... What I did find was a wide selection of B&W and Dynaudio, and one little surprise in the form of a pair of Quad 22L's...
I used the same CD's and same tracks that I have been using to test most of the speakers I have been listening to, and I gotta tell ya, I am starting to get sick of hearing those songs! With the speakers that I like, I find myself delving further into each CD so I can just enjoy the music. The speakers that I don't feel a connection with, I find myself pushing through all my test tracks, hoping I will find something engaging in the sound.

Here we go (again)...

Dynaudio Audience 72-SE(≈$2500)

Started with Jazz, and found the Audience 72-SE's to present nice piano sounds, clear cymbals, and a fairly accurate, but dry tone on Grant Green's guitar. I thought that these speakers imaged well with this recording. I moved into Fela Kuti and first noticed that the bass was decent and carried some impact with it. The highs came across tight, with decent sounding brass, though I was starting to feel like the music was veiled with these speakers (recessed mids maybe). <"Veiled" is a term I have read in several user reviews of equipment, but one that I myself have never used until now.> The recording of Fela Kuti is a very dynamic one, that through these speakers seemed much less so, if that makes any sense to you. I played the Beatles "Come Together" and felt that the bass guitar was warm and smooth but lacked any sort of punch to it. The electric guitars were forward but vocals seemed recessed. Erykah Badu was missing something with the 72's, bass was not all that deep, rim shots didn't sound true, I had heard enough of this speaker. On to the next in the Dynaudio line...

Dynaudio Audience 82(≈$2800)

Top of the Audience line, and for $300 more than the 72 SE's you get better definition, and more bass impact, and a more enveloping sound. I started with the Hard rock of Fu Manchu, which I did not listen to on the 72's. The electric guitars sounded decent though they did not have as much of an aggressive quality that I have heard on other speakers. The 82's still sounded a bit veiled to me, still laid back. At this point I am wondering if this is just the Dynaudio sound. I put in Fela Kuti and immediately noticed that they sounded more clear, the congestion I was hearing in the 72's was better. Horns came through with more of an edge to them. I put in the Beatles and found a better more enveloping overall sound. There was more bass impact, and vocals were more forward. I felt that this speaker improved significantly on the shortcomings of the 72. Erykah Badu had a deeper bass line, but not as deep as some of the other speakers I have auditioned. Vocals were better, a more balanced sound, and rimshots sounded crisp though more like wood on wood than wood on metal. I put in Red Snapper, a disk I used in earlier rounds; it is electronic based with an upright acoustic bass, some deep synth tones, and a variety of sounds that stretch the upper end. They provide a very nice atmosphere and at times a very wide musical spectrum. With electronic music I found the Auduence 82's to hint at the sub bass, but not to present it fully. overall I would say that they did a pretty good job with it. My lasting impression with the Dynaudio 82's is that they performed far better with Jazz and electronic music (music that is not so dense) than they did with rock, though in this department they did much better than the smaller 72 SE's.

Dynaudio Focus 220(≈$3000)

I swear these must have gone up in price in the last month, because the Focus 220's were on my original list of speakers to audition, when my budget was capped at $2000... So, naturally I had to listen to them. Before I comment on their sound, I have to say that these are beautiful looking speakers. The veiner and finish are gorgeous, pictures do not do these babies justice...
I started with the Beatles this time and thought that the Focus 220's had a very nice presentation. Highs, mids and lows all came across very smooth, and well balanced. I thought that this is a speaker that has a neutral sound. (Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not think I have said that about any of the speakers I have listened to so far, except maybe the Vandersteens... but this one I think embodies it.) On "Come Together" guitars and drums sounded meaty, and cymbals clear. The bell in "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" rang true. Drums in "The End" (could be my favorite break beat of all time) did not get lost in the din of the crescendo. Vocals were smooth throughout. I wanted to listen to all of Abbey Road, start to finish on these speakers, but I had several more tests ahead.
Next up was Fela Kuti "Shuffering And Shmiling" (yes, thats the way they spelled it on the album) and the nice recording here came through beautifully. The horns sounded natural, slightly shrill where they would be when played live, not bright, not rolled off, but correct. The mids and highs were exceptional with afro-beat, and that cymbals were tight and accurate and had a nice decay. At this point I began to notice that the Focus 220's were missing a bit of clarity in the bottom end. (I think that it was due to their placement directly in front of the Audience 82's, and the fact that the Focus 220's are a rear ported design. Because of this less than ideal placement I am inclined to believe that they would perform at least equal to their $200 cheaper cousins in terms of bass clarity with better placement. This is my 20/20 hindsight, speaking)
Erykah Badu proved to have a velvety smooth and full bass-line, that also (and a little annoyingly) seemed to lack a bit of definition. Rim shots sounded good though still not quite wood on metal true. Her vocals came across smokey and lush. Despite what I was hearing as a little bit of a loose bottom end, I thought these speakers were very easy to listen to.
Red Snapper went in and nice clarity came out. Acoustic instruments sounded crisp, and electro beats were handled with grace. Tight synth drums were tight, and the upper range was crystal clear. I also began to notice that the Focus 220's were imaging nicely, though off axis listening suffered a bit(as it does with most speakers).
Fu Manchu proved to be the first recording to reveal a more laidback nature to the 220's. They were not as aggressive in the mids as other speakers have been with this recording. Again I noticed the lack of definition in the bass, but nothing too severe. They sounded more closed in with this recording, not as open as they did with other music. Here they may be revealing the recording itself, which is admittedly less that ideal.
Grant Green sounded great. All the Dynaudios seemed to like Jazz better than rock. The acoustic bass sounded a bit sloppy though. (I really do not mean to dwell on that, because I think that better placement would go a long way to resolve it and I am really just transcribing my notes here to organize my thoughts in my own head.)
Upper bass, mids and highs are very nice on the Dynaudio Focus 220's, though they do not have that tight, quickness in the very bottom that I am looking for. But due to placement issues I think they deserve a second listen, in a more ideal location (like my home? )
I get the impression the high price tag is a common trait for all Dynaudio speakers and think that they are about $1000 too high across the board. Okay maybe $500, but only because they are so pretty...


As I was wandering around the listening room I noticed a pair of small black towers hiding next some cardboard speaker boxes, set off to the side, not very noticeable. When I looked a little closer I realized that they were on my list! I asked the manager about them and he said he took them in on a trade and told me the price which was incredible considering their condition and the msrp. He said he would gladly hook them up so I could have a listen. Unfortunately he put them in the same spot as he had put the Focus 220's, and being another rear ported design I think the bass suffered because of it...

Quad 22L(msrp≈$1800)

First thing I noted about the Quads was that they were more focused than the Dynaudios I had been listening to (read: didn't sound as good off axis, pretty tight sweet-spot... while this is may be good in other parts of life , maybe not the best thing with speakers ) They did however have a very nice open presentation, cymbals sounded good, and the mids were perhaps slightly forward with Grant Green. I noticed the same sloppy acoustic bass that I noticed with the Focus 220's, which is why I made my conclusions about placement. I figured what are the chances that two speakers from two different companies would create identical weirdness? I slipped in Re Snapper to test out the sub bass, and found it was there, well, at least hinted at. I thought they would be perfect candidates to run with a sub. (funny, because when I got home last night I searched for comments about this speaker from other people to see how they compared to my observations and most of them commented on how low this speaker went, again reinforcing my placement theory and the importance of listening to these speakers yourself) The Beatles vocals sounded good, as did the upper frequencies. Fu Manchu was suitably chunky but seemed to be missing the lowest octave. I came away with the impression that the Quad 22L's were a "bookshelf" speaker in a tall box.



On the way out of the shop I stopped to give a very brief (refresher)listen to the
B&W CM-7(revisited)
I was not as impressed as I was the first time I heard them (more things to compare them to now) but I still felt that they were quite good. The bass went pretty low, though not as low as some and was a little loose. I still have an appreciation for their open sound and they impressed me enough on first listen to give them a second sit down in the future.



____________

Okay I set out to hear the Thiels yesterday and, **** it I was going to do it. I did. At another shop about 2-3 miles from the first.

Thiel CS 1.6(≈$2500)

I listened to the Thiel's through a Creek integrated amp that put out 50wpc (I think) in an attempt to equate the Onkyo I have at home, and I feel that with more power that they very well may be capable of more in the bass department. (For the record, I think the salesman had some off-base preconceived notions about what he called "some ****** home theater receiver")
I started out with Grant Green and immediately the highs came off very crisp. There was nice tone to the guitar. The acoustic bass was somewhere in the deep background, and the cymbals were way up front. Kind of made for a distorted soundstage. Saxophone sounded good. There was a definite edge to the sound of the Thiels. Fela Kuti sounded bright overall and I felt the bottom end was lacking. However, the trumpets and saxophones did not sound as harsh as I expected them to, they actually sounded quite good. The Beatles bass punch was there but failed to envelop. Vocals sounded pretty good, as did the guitar. At this point I was definitely feeling that these were not the speakers for me, and my ears were tired. I really thought that the Thiel CS 1.6 would benefit greatly by a tube amp. I pressed on with Erykah Badu and heard the bass there but not full enough, rim shots were crisp, cymbal hits were downright brittle. Kick drum came strangely forward and sound more electro than acoustic. Just for a, "why not?" I put on Fu Manchu and found a lack of lower mids. This speaker definitely favors the high end. The bass was recessed again; there but not full. That is what makes me feel increased amplification would bring the bass out of the Thiels. Not a favorable audition for me, not the sound I am looking for, though they looked pretty cool with the grills off.

The only other thing of interest to me in this shop (i.e. in my price range) was a pair of bookshelves:

PSB Synchrony 2B (≈$1500)

We decided to increase the power to see what these things were actually capable of, and set them up in the same room. After a couple of false starts which included me telling the salesman that only one speaker was working, and another one when I noticed there was no bass coming from one speaker. Once we got that all figured out these little guys sounded great. With Erykah Badu the PSB's produced an impressive amount of bass, rim shots were crisp and sounded authentic. Vocals were rich and smooth. Fela Kuti had a nice full range of sound going on, with good detail. Horns had a slight edge to them without sounding bright, and cymbals sounded great. With Red Snapper the acoustic bass sounded pretty good but failed to fully envelop. Electro beats were handled nicely. I get the impression that these are really good "all around" speakers. The Beatles gave a pretty even sound, nothing stood out, could be I am hearing another nearly neutral speaker. On "Come Together" the guitars were slightly forward, but I think that it was the way it was intended. In "The End" the drums sounded excellent, and easily panned across the soundstage with the recording. Fu Manchu sounded pretty good but lacked a bit of growl on these speakers.
I liked the PSB Synchrony 2B, and I am interested in finding out more about them and the other speakers in the Synchrony family.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #57
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

While I haven't heard the new ERA D-10 and D-14, I'm surprised you didn't like them.
I didn't care for the D-10, they were lacking in midrange and bass, but the D-14's I did like. I just thought that they were lacking in the highs, but I also stated that was most likely because I listened to them directly after hearing a set of speakers with a ribbon tweeter for the first time. I actually want to listen to the ERA D-14's again, but this time with fresh ears.

By the way, you do a good job of being quite concise in your reviews...keep on truckin'; you'll find something you absolutely love.
Thanks Konky

I'm really surprised you're having so much trouble finding Revels. Oh, speaking fo the continuously rising pricing; when you get to the 3K level, you should be able to find a really nice used pair of Aerial Acoustics 10Ts (Audiogon)...which while in production (trust me they're still a very very very good speaker) were >8K a pair with Sound Anchors.
I am surprised the Revels are so hard to find too, especially in such a huge city. I will keep an eye out for used Aerial's BTW I listened to my first 3K speakers yesterday...

-Greg
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #58
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Excellent write-up! Thank you for sharing your experiences. I love hearing about peoples auditions.

I almost hope you never find "The One" so we can can continue to get these great writeups.

JCD
Thanks Jacen, Great timing! :T while you were posting the dealers I was organizing my chicken scratch notes and trying to put together some cohesive thoughts on a few Dynaudio's I listened to yesterday...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
172 Posts
Discussion Starter #59
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

If that was my list, the Revels would get the top honors.
They are the ones I want to hear most, but am having the hardest time finding... isn't that always the case though.

Might also add VA.
Is that Vienna Acoustic??? I heard the Bach's but liked the Monitors better, Unfortunately I don't know much about their other offerings...

And thanks for the other info, John.

Cheers,
Greg
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,582 Posts
Re: $1500-$2000 Fronts

Just for reference, here is the price list for Dynaudio's line -- at least as of March 2007. The focus 220's were $3000/pr according to the list.

I'm disappointed that the Audience line wasn't as good as I was hoping. Thanks again for the great write ups.

JCD
 
41 - 60 of 110 Posts
Top