Home Theater Forum and Systems banner

Successive EQ recommendations and adjustments with REW

1089 Views 3 Replies 3 Participants Last post by  JohnM
All,

HUGE fan of the capability of REW - "found" it a few weeks back and it has changed my tuning game. In particular, I've beening enjoying the equalization feature which has eliminated all of the guesswork from my full-range equalization efforts.

A question I have about equalization (I'll start with the disclaimer that this is in the car audio arena):

I'm using a "generic" EQ that has PEQ functionality across 31 completely variable bands. Q is limited to 6.

I often need to go through multiple, successive rounds of equalization. For example, I may EQ a driver individually, then EQ combined response. I have a hard time adjusting the first round of filters during the second round. Ultimately, I end up just usually creating another filter that may have considerable overlap with the first. I'm essentially EQ'ing the EQ.

As an example, EQ'ing a single driver might require a 4 dB boost at 2125 Hz with a Q of 3.89 (as predicted by REW). Once combined with the opposite driver (summing/cancellation), I might need to do a 2 dB cut at 1895 with a Q of 2.1. Since it's too hard to adjust the first filter accurately, I just create a new filter that overlaps (and works opposite to) the first.

Thoughts on whether this is an issue? My other option is to just use my EQ as a 1/3-octave by manually setting the frequencies and Q, which would be easy to adjust for successive rounds. I find this to be less accurate and often requires more filters.

Also, is there any way to limit the Q in the "generic" REW equalizer?

Thanks!
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Have you used the RTA in REW?
Yes I'm using the REW RTA and EQ functions.
As an example, EQ'ing a single driver might require a 4 dB boost at 2125 Hz with a Q of 3.89 (as predicted by REW). Once combined with the opposite driver (summing/cancellation), I might need to do a 2 dB cut at 1895 with a Q of 2.1. Since it's too hard to adjust the first filter accurately, I just create a new filter that overlaps (and works opposite to) the first.

Thoughts on whether this is an issue?
There is no problem with having overlapping filters.

Also, is there any way to limit the Q in the "generic" REW equalizer?
Afraid not, one of the many things on the to do list, but you could use the DCX2496 equaliser setting which has an upper limit of 10, a bit closer at least.
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top