So here is my problem with the whole vertical stretch/lens vs zoom question... If your BR disc has 1080 lines output, and 270 of those are black pixels from the source you aren't really gaining any information (or loosing it for that matter) by stretching it and lensing it right?
It's like saying you take a CD, rip it to 256k MP3 and then re burn it as a regular CD. Your CD is back at full data rate, but you are just filling in the blanks with redundant information. You've lost (or never had in the case of BR 2.35:1 discs) the information you are displaying.
Sure the pixels might be .01" bigger with the zoom, but at least it's all the "real" content and not filled in with data the projector decides to put in there.
Am I missing the point??
Thanks.
It's like saying you take a CD, rip it to 256k MP3 and then re burn it as a regular CD. Your CD is back at full data rate, but you are just filling in the blanks with redundant information. You've lost (or never had in the case of BR 2.35:1 discs) the information you are displaying.
Sure the pixels might be .01" bigger with the zoom, but at least it's all the "real" content and not filled in with data the projector decides to put in there.
Am I missing the point??
Thanks.