Been reading and researching mostly and decided plasma was definately what I wanted but after a side by side comparison in my room it seemed the LCD did better at what I read plasmas are supposed to do better??? Mainly looking at black levels between the two day and night viewing and the LCD's black was closer to the black you see when the screen is off than the plasma's was. Tv's were Sony KDL55EX500 and Samsung PN50C550. Also went and compared in store a C7000 and G25 plasmas to LCD's and didn't notice much difference with the better models. I didn't really run any sort of calibration on the tv's while I had them but it seemed the plasma would have gotten alot better than the LCD if I had but still the black level didn't seem like it would have improved. I thought this was supposed to be the other way around?
The Plasma had remarkably faster processing. I had a concert on dvd watching simoutaneously on both and the plasma was displaying everything before the lcd. Mostly noticed in the lighting you would see a flash on the plasma then a moment later on the LCD. I would imagine with online gaming this would make the game play faster and more responsive.
The Plasma had remarkably faster processing. I had a concert on dvd watching simoutaneously on both and the plasma was displaying everything before the lcd. Mostly noticed in the lighting you would see a flash on the plasma then a moment later on the LCD. I would imagine with online gaming this would make the game play faster and more responsive.